Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of Ideology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Comparative Political Culture
  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

Does the ideology belong to the category of political culture? For this problem, the previous explanation has been made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Webster’s New international Dictionary, 1948.

  2. 2.

    Barbara Goodwin, Using Political ideas, New York; John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1982, p. 22.

  3. 3.

    Robert E, Lane, Poiiticaf Ideology: Why the American Common Man Believes What He Does, New York: The Free Press, 1962, pp. 14–15.

  4. 4.

    Talcott Parsons, The Social System, New York, 1951, p. 354.

  5. 5.

    Daniel Bell, “Ideology and Soviet Politics”, Slavic Review, 24 December 1965, p. 595, n. 6.

  6. 6.

    Writings of Hu Shi, Huangshan Publishing House, 1998, p. 276.

  7. 7.

    Charles Funderburk, Robert G. Thobaben, Political Ideologies, Harper Collins College Publisher, 1994, p. vii.

  8. 8.

    Charles Funderburk, Robert G. Thobaben, Political Ideologies., Harper Collins College Publisher, 1994, pp. 1–5.

  9. 9.

    [US] Daniel Bell: The End of Ideology, Contemporary American Bourgeois Philosophy Document (Volume 4), Commercial Press, 1980, p. 148.

  10. 10.

    Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Haper & Row, 1957, p. 96.

  11. 11.

    [US] Michael Roskin, Robert Kerde, James Medeiros, Walt Jones, Political Science, Huaxia Publishing House, 2000, p. 104.

  12. 12.

    Anthology of Marx and Engels, Volume 4, People’s Publishing House, 1995, p. 726.

  13. 13.

    Anthology of Marx and Engels, Volume 4, People’s Publishing House, 1972, p. 726.

  14. 14.

    Henry Aiken, The Age of Ideology. The Nineteenth Century Philosophers New York: Mentor, 1956, pp. 16–17.

  15. 15.

    [Slovenia] Slavoj Zizek: Figure Painting Ideology, translated by Fang Tai, Nanjing University Press, 2002, p. 13.

  16. 16.

    Charles Funderburk, Robert G. Thobaben, Political ideologies, Harper Collins College Publisher, 1994, pp. 1–2.

  17. 17.

    Wang Leli: Introductory Theory of Political Culture, China Renmin University Press, 2000, p. 82.

  18. 18.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 115.

  19. 19.

    Hayek thought, “it probably marks the initiation of modern liberalism better than any other book”. [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 114.

  20. 20.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 71.

  21. 21.

    [US] Dahl: Foreword of Democratic Theory, translated by Gu Xin & Zhu Dan, SDX Joint Publishing Company, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 48.

  22. 22.

    [US] Milton Friedman: Capitalism and Freedom, translated by Zhang Ruiyu, Commercial Press, 2011, p. 8.

  23. 23.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 115.

  24. 24.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 62.

  25. 25.

    Jose Ortega Y. Gasset, The Revolt of the Masses, University of Notre Dame Press, 195, p. 109.

  26. 26.

    [UK] Michael H. Lessnoff: Political Philosopher of the 20th Century, translated by Feng Keli, Commercial Press, 2001, p. 39.

  27. 27.

    Gustave Le Bon, The Psychology of Revolution, New York, 1913, p. 315.

  28. 28.

    [US] Burns: Political Theory of the Contemporary World, translated by Zeng Bingjun, Commercial Press, 1983, p. 81.

  29. 29.

    In the Colombias Dictionary, under Clause “Croce”, p. 181. Prezzolini explicated the consistency between Croce and the Americans about the concept of freedom, Katharine Gilbert also made a recitation for Croce in the book The Non-balance of Croces Historicism.

  30. 30.

    [UK] Merz: European History of Thought of the 19th Century, translated by Zhou Changzhong, Commercial Press, 1999, p. 16.

  31. 31.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: European History of Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001, p. 325.

  32. 32.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: European History of Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001, p. 161.

  33. 33.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: European History of Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001, p. 326.

  34. 34.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 120.

  35. 35.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 61–62.

  36. 36.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 64.

  37. 37.

    Xu Datong, editor in chief, History of Western Political Thought, Tianlai Education Publishing House, 2000, p. 203.

  38. 38.

    [US] Joe Sartori: The Theory of Democracy Revisited, translated by Feng Keli & Yan Kewen, China Eastern Press, 1998, p. 61.

  39. 39.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 70.

  40. 40.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 222.

  41. 41.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 334.

  42. 42.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 11.

  43. 43.

    [US] Dewey, Old and New LiberalismCollected Works of Dewey, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1997. p. 27. Also refer to Dewey’s The Public and its Problems, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1965, p. 29.

  44. 44.

    [Iran] Ramin Jahanbegloo: Conversations with Isaiah Berlin, translated by Yang Zhenqin, Yilin Press, 2000, p. 37.

  45. 45.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 32.

  46. 46.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 5.

  47. 47.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 61.

  48. 48.

    [US] Ronald Dworkin, Two Concepts of Liberty, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 144.

  49. 49.

    [Canada] Charles Taylor, How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty, translated by Da Wei, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 70.

  50. 50.

    [Canada] Charles Taylor, How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty, translated by Da Wei, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 70.

  51. 51.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: History of European Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001. p. 347.

  52. 52.

    John Dewey, Philosophy and Cmtizatlon, New York, Minton, BiackSt Company, 1931, p. 28.

  53. 53.

    John Dewey, Philosophy and Civilization, New York, Minton, Black & Company, 1931, p. 286.

  54. 54.

    John Dewey, Philosophy and Civilization, New York, Minton, Black & Company, 1931, p. 284.

  55. 55.

    Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford Paperbacks, 1969, p. Ivi. Refer to [US] Ronald Dworkin, Two Concepts of Liberty, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 145.

  56. 56.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: History of European Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001. p. 333.

  57. 57.

    [Canada] Charles Taylor, How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty, translated by Da Wei, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 75.

  58. 58.

    [Canada] Charles Taylor, How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty, translated by Da Wei, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 91.

  59. 59.

    [Iran] Ramin Jahanbegloo: Conversations with Isaiah Berlin, translated by Yang Zhenqin, Yilin Press, 2002, p. 37.

  60. 60.

    [Iran] Ramin Jahanbegloo: Conversations with Isaiah Berlin, translated by Yang Zhenqin, Yilin Press, 2002, p. 135.

  61. 61.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 124.

  62. 62.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 124.

  63. 63.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in the Public Treatise, Vol. 6, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 136.

  64. 64.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: History of European Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001. p. 328.

  65. 65.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: History of European Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001. pp. 332–333.

  66. 66.

    John Dewey, Philosophy and Civilization, New York, Minton, Balck & Company, 1931, p. 276.

  67. 67.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, pp. 62–63.

  68. 68.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 5.

  69. 69.

    [Iran] Ramin Jahanbegloo: Conversations with Isaiah Berlin, translated by Yang Zhenqin, Yilin Press, 2002, p. 138.

  70. 70.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 10.

  71. 71.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 11.

  72. 72.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, pp. 8–9.

  73. 73.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 231.

  74. 74.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 102.

  75. 75.

    [France] Tocqueville: Democracy in America (Vol. 1), translated by Dong Guoliang, Commercial Press, 1997, p. 4.

  76. 76.

    [France] Tocqueville: Democracy in America (Vol. 1), translated by Dong Guoliang, Commercial Press, 1997, p. 5.

  77. 77.

    [US] Dewey: Social Philosophy and Political Philosophy, contained in Dewey on China, edited by Shen Yihong, Zhejiang Literature & Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 64.

  78. 78.

    [US] Dewey: The Public and its Problems, translated by Fu Tongxian & Qiu Chun, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1965, p. 46.

  79. 79.

    [UK] Merz, History of European Thoughts of the 19th Century, translated by Zhou Changzhong, Commercial Press, 1999, p. 69.

  80. 80.

    [France] Tocqueville: Democracy in America (Vol. 1), translated by Dong Guoliang, Commercial Press, 1997, p. 621.

  81. 81.

    [France] Tocqueville: Democracy in America (Vol. 2), translated by Dong Guoliang, Commercial Press, 1997, p. 634.

  82. 82.

    [Iran] Ramin Jahanbegloo: Conversations with Isaiah Berlin, translated by Yang Zhenqin, Yilin Press, 2002, p. 133.

  83. 83.

    [Iran] Ramin Jahanbegloo: Conversations with Isaiah Berlin, translated by Yang Zhenqin, Yilin Press, 2002, p. 131.

  84. 84.

    [US] Written by John Dewey, translated by Fu Tongxian & Qiu Rong: People of Men, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1965, p. 45.

  85. 85.

    John Dewey: The Public and its Problems, New York, 1927, p. 184.

  86. 86.

    [US] Dewey: Social Philosophy and Political Philosophy, contained in Dewey on China, edited by Shen Yihong, Zhejiang Literature & Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 34.

  87. 87.

    [US] Dewey: Neo- and New LiberalismCollected Works of Dewey, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 1997, p. 33.

  88. 88.

    [France] Benjamin Constant: Freedom of Ancient People and Freedom of Modern People, translated by Yan Kewen & Liu Mangui, Commercial Press, 1999, p. 56.

  89. 89.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 246.

  90. 90.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: European History of Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001, p. 198.

  91. 91.

    [US] Ronald Dworkin, Two Concepts of Liberty, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 144.

  92. 92.

    [UK] Edited by David Herder, Models of Democracy, translated by Yan Jirong et al., Central Compilation & Translation Press, 1998, p. 4.

  93. 93.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in Public Treatise, Vol. 6. SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 109.

  94. 94.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in Public Treatise, Vol. 6. SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 133.

  95. 95.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in Public Treatise, Vol. 6. SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 133.

  96. 96.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: European History of Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001, p. 351.

  97. 97.

    [US] Dahl: A Preface to Democratic Theory, translated by Gu Xin & Zhu Dan, SDX Joint Publishing Company, Oxford University Press, 1999, p. 85.

  98. 98.

    [US] Dahl: A Preface to Democratic Theory, translated by Gu Xin & Zhu Dan, SDX Joint Publishing Company, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 43–44.

  99. 99.

    [US] Dahl: A Preface to Democratic Theory, translated by Gu Xin & Zhu Dan, SDX Joint Publishing Company, Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 50–51.

  100. 100.

    [UK] David Herder, Models of Democracy, translated by Yan Jirong et al., Central Compilation & Translation Press, 1998, p. 254.

  101. 101.

    [Germany] Jurgen Habermas, Three Normative Models of Democracy, contained in [Germany] Jurgen Habermas, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, edited and translated by Cao Weidong, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2002, pp. 279–294.

  102. 102.

    [US] Joe Sartori: The Theory of Democracy Revisited, translated by Feng Keli & Yan Kewen, China Eastern Press, 1998, p. 59.

  103. 103.

    [US] Joe Sartori: The Theory of Democracy Revisited, translated by Feng Keli & Yan Kewen, China Eastern Press, 1998, p. 60.

  104. 104.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 246.

  105. 105.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in Public Treatise, Vol. 6. SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 123.

  106. 106.

    [UK] Hayek: Liberalism, translated by Feng Keli, contained in Public Treatise, Vol. 6. SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2000, p. 111.

  107. 107.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 243.

  108. 108.

    [UK] Friedrich von Hayek: The Constitution of Liberty, translated by Deng Zhenglai, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1997, p. 245.

  109. 109.

    [Italy] Guido de Ruggiero: European History of Liberalism, translated by Yang Jun, Jilin People’s Publishing House, 2001, p. 239.

  110. 110.

    In Aristotle’s Politics, he often calls democratic regime as civil regime, although the two have a certain degree of difference, their connotations coincide fundamentally.

  111. 111.

    Please refer to Thomas Hobbes, The Elements of Law; Natural and Politic, edited by J. C. A. Gaskin, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, Part II, Chapter 27. Thomas Hobbes, On the Citizen, edited by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 121, for the relevant contents. David Gauthier declared that Hobbes’s transition between two views of freedom is “the sharpest”. Refer to DWid Gauthie: The Logic of Lemthan, the Moraf and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbest Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969, pp. 145–146.

  112. 112.

    [UK] Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan, translated by Li Sifu & Li Tingbi, Commercial Press, 1985, p. 166. Slightly modified from the original. Ttiomas Hobbes, Leviathan, Beijing: China Social Science Publishing House, 1999, p. 164.

  113. 113.

    Thomas Hobbes, On the Citizen edited by Richard Tuck and Michael Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 122. In fact, Hobbes may have a misunderstanding on Aristotle. Aristotle’s original text is only a statement for the view prevailing at that time. Refer to [Ancient Greece] Aristotle: Politics, translated by Wu Shoupeng, Commercial Press, 1965, p. 312.

  114. 114.

    [UK] Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan, translated by Li Sifu & Li Tingbi, Commercial Press, 1985, p. 168.

  115. 115.

    [UK] Thomas Hobbes. Leviathan, translated by Li Sifu & Li Tingbi, Commercial Press, 1985, p. 167.

  116. 116.

    [UK] Harrington, Oceana, translated by He Xin, Commercial Press, 1963, p. 21.

  117. 117.

    [UK] Harrington, Oceana, translated by He Xin, Commercial Press, 1963, p. 21.

  118. 118.

    [UK] Christopher J. Bailey: Freedom and Modernity, contained in Treatise of Chinese and Western Political Culture, Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 2002, p. 264.

  119. 119.

    [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, p. 4.

  120. 120.

    Isaiah Beri'm: Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984, p. 166.

  121. 121.

    [US] John Rawls, Theory of Justice, translated by He Huaihong et al., China Social Sciences Publishing House, 1988, p. 191. The “Constante” in the paper is “Constant” herein.

  122. 122.

    [US] John Rawls, Theory of Justice, translated by He Huaihong et al., China Social Sciences Publishing House, 1988, p. 187.

  123. 123.

    For the detailed contents of such transition, please refer to Wan Junren’s Modern Construction of Political Liberalism, contained in [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, pp. 558–569.

  124. 124.

    Quoted from [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, p. 429.

  125. 125.

    [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, p. 317.

  126. 126.

    [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, p. 241.

  127. 127.

    Rawls emphasized for many times that the main difference between Habermas’s and his viewpoint lies in “his opinion is complete, while my opinion is a political explanation”. [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, p. 395.

  128. 128.

    [US] John Rawls, Political Liberalism, translated by Wan Junren, Yilin Publishing House, 2000, p. 430.

  129. 129.

    [US] John Rawls, Theory of Justice, translated by He Huaihong et al., China Social Sciences Publishing House, 1988, p. 218. [US] John Rawls, Justice As EqualityNew Theory of Justice, translated by Yao Dazhi, SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2002, p. 240.

  130. 130.

    [Japan] Zhonggangwencheng, HabermasCommunication Behavior, translated by Wang Pin, Hebei Education Press, 2001, p. 200.

  131. 131.

    Miller, Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 5.

  132. 132.

    Michael Sandel, Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996, p. 27.

  133. 133.

    [Germany] Jurgen Habermas, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, translated by Cao Weidong, Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2002, p. 81.

  134. 134.

    Jurgen Habermas, Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles? Political Theory, Dec 2001, Vol. 29 Issue 6, pp. 766–782.

  135. 135.

    Felix Oppenheim, Political ConceptsA Reconstruction, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981, p. 92, p. 162.

  136. 136.

    [Canada] Charles Taylor, How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty, translated by Da Wei, contained in How Is It Not Good for Negative Liberty edited by Dawei et al., Culture and Art Publishing House, 2001, p. 73 & 90. Quentin Skinner, The Paradox of Political Liberty, The Tanner Lectures on Human Value, Vol. VII, edited by S. McMurrin, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1986.

  137. 137.

    [US] Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and The Last Man, translated by Huang Shengqiang & Xu Mingyuan, China Social Sciences Publishing House, 2003. p. 1.

  138. 138.

    Sandel, Democrac’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Harvard University Press, 1996, pp. 25–26.

  139. 139.

    Sandel, Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Harvard University Press, 1996, pp. 5–6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dezhi Tong .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Higher Education Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tong, D. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Ideology. In: Introduction to Comparative Political Culture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1574-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics