Developing and Recruiting the Future Public Servant

  • Deborah BlackmanEmail author
  • Samantha Johnson
  • Helen Dickinson
  • Linda Dewey
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Political Science book series (BRIEFSPOLITICAL)


If the public service of the future is to fulfil the many different roles suggested in this book and have the types of competencies and skills needed to acquit them, there will need to be a significant shift in terms of the development and recruitment of public servants. Recruitment has traditionally been on the basis of skills and abilities in relation to particular professional domains, or based upon the tasks historically seen to be part of the role. However, as this book has illustrated, the future public servant will need explicit skills and abilities that go beyond these narrow confines and a different range of skills and abilities will be required and developed within strategic workforce planning. In this chapter we consider the types of changes that will be needed in relation to the development and recruitment of public servants, presenting examples of successful initiatives and suggestions that are transforming organizational practice. We suggest that there needs to be a rethinking of not only the types of skills required from ‘hard’ to ‘soft’ (Dickinson et al. in Aust J Public Adm 74:23–32, 2015), but also the way that such skills should be identified and developed. In this chapter we first clarify the importance of public servant capabilities and historical limitations with developing them. We then present social learning theory, suggesting that a move towards focusing on how things are learnt, rather than what is learnt, might enable a change in the human resource practices chosen to support capability development. Specifically, we use four elements of social learning as a framework to suggest development and recruitment activities which would better support the development of future public servants.


Future Public Service Strategic Workforce Planning Explicit Skills Human Resource Development Practitioners Social Learning Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adams, J., & Morgan, G. (2007). Second generation E-learning: Characteristics and design principles for supporting management soft-skills development. International Journal on ELearning, 6(2), 157–185.Google Scholar
  2. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20, S9–S24. Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Blackman, D. (2018). Knowledge management and communities of practice: Supporting successful knowledge transfer. In J. Syed, P. A. Murray, D. Hislop, & Y. Mouzughi (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of knowledge management. Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  7. Blackman, D. A., Buick, F., O’Flynn, J., O’Donnell, M., & West, D. (2017). Managing expectations to create high performance government. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Scholar
  8. Blackman, D., Johnson, S., Buick, F., Fafua, D., O’Donnell, M., & Forsythe, M. (2016). The 70:20:10 model for learning and development: An effective model for capability development? In Academy of Management Annual Meeting, August 5–9, Anaheim, California.Google Scholar
  9. Brewster, A. L., Curry, L. A., Cherlin, E. J., Talbert-Slagle, K., Horwitz, L. I., & Bradley, E. H. (2015). Integrating new practices: A qualitative study of how hospital innovations become routine. Implementation Science, 10, 168. Scholar
  10. Buick, F., Blackman, D. A., O’Donnell, M. E., O’Flynn, J. L., & West, D. (2015). Can enhanced performance management support public sector change? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 271–289. Scholar
  11. Buller, P. F., & McEvoy, G. M. (1990). Exploring the long-term effects of behaviour modelling training. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 3(1), 32–45. Scholar
  12. Daley, D. M. (2015). Strategic human resource management. In N. M. Riccucci (Ed.), Public personnel management. Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. Scholar
  14. Dickinson, H., Sullivan, H., & Head, G. (2015). The future of the public service workforce: A dialogue. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74, 23–32. Scholar
  15. Dickinson, H., & Sullivan, H. (2014). Imagining the 21st century public service workforce. Melbourne School of Government.
  16. Ellström, P. E. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Conceptual issues and critical conditions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flemig, S., Osborne, S., & Kinder, T. (2016). Risky business—Reconceptualizing risk and innovation in public services. Public Money & Management, 36(6), 425–432. Scholar
  18. Gibson, S. (2004). Social learning (cognitive) theory and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 193–210. Scholar
  19. Hartley, J., Alford, J., Hughes, O., & Yates, S. (2015). Public value and political astuteness in the work of public managers: The art of the possible. Public Administration, 93(1), 195–211. Scholar
  20. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. Scholar
  21. Huselid, M. A., Becker, B. E., & Beatty, R. W. (2005). The workforce scorecard: Managing human capital to execute strategy. Boston, MS: Harvard Business School Press. Scholar
  22. Kajewski, K., & Madsen, V. (2013). Demystifying 70:20:10. DeakinPrime: Melbourne.
  23. Krylova, K. O., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2016). Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: The crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), 1045–1064. Scholar
  24. NSW Public Service Commission (NSW PSC). (2015). NSW Public Sector Capability Framework.
  25. Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 453–465. Scholar
  26. Seidle, B., Fernandez, S., & Perry, J. L. (2016). Do leadership training and development make a difference in the public sector? A panel study. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 603–613. Scholar
  27. Sparr, J. L., Knipfer, K., & Willems, F. (2017). How leaders can get the most out of formal training: The significance of feedback-seeking and reflection as informal learning behaviors. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(1), 29–54. Scholar
  28. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533. <509:AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Zw.
  29. Training Industry. (2015). 70:20:10 model for learning and development.
  30. Van Der Wal, Z. (2017). The 21st century public manager. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Victorian Public Sector Commission (VPSC). (2015). Components of the VPS HR Capability Framework. Victorian Public Sector Commission.

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Blackman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Samantha Johnson
    • 2
  • Helen Dickinson
    • 1
  • Linda Dewey
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Service Research GroupUniversity of New South WalesCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.School of BusinessUNSW CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations