Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empathy, Ethics and Efficiency: Twenty First Century Capabilities for Public Managers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reimagining the Future Public Service Workforce

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Political Science ((BRIEFSPOLITICAL))

Abstract

Over the next thirty years to 2050, public sector leaders and managers will need dramatically to develop their capabilities if they are to keep ahead of the demands and pressures that they and their organizations will face. Above all, public leaders need to reconnect the people working in government and the public sector with those whom they serve. Of course, public sector professionals need to possess subject matter expertise and to continuously improve their expertise at pace and in depth. But they also need to develop their capabilities in the three “E’s” of empathy, ethics and efficiency. These three capabilities will need to come to the fore over the next period. There will be a greater need for public servants to demonstrate empathy in their work; they will need to apply more nuanced ethical approaches to solving public problems and dilemmas; and finally, they will need to take ever more efficient approaches to allocating public goods and securing public services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Zero degrees of empathy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W., et al. (2013). The cost disease: Why computers get cheaper and health care doesn’t. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazalgette, P. (2017). The empathy instinct: How the art and science of compassion can build a better society. London: JohnMurray.Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. London: Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace, C. (2016). The economic singularity: Artificial intelligence and the death of capitalism. San Mateo: Three Cs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues: Rights, citizenship and republican liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (2010). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Broadway Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M., et al. (2016). Who do you trust to run the country? Canberra Institute of Governance and Policy Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh, J. (2017, July 25). Brexit is the child of complacency, not pain. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. (2012). Preference, value, choice and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (1984). The needs of strangers. New York: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos. (2016). Veracity index. Ipsos Mori.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, I. (2008). How to make good decisions and be right every time. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1950). The Prince. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2014). Ruling the void: The hollowing out of western democracy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevitte, N. (1996). The decline of deference: Canadian value change in cross-national perspective. Peterborough: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K., & Norris, P. (1999). Confidence in public institutions. JFK School of Government Policy Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2009, May 26). President Barack Obama introduces Judge Sonya Sotomayor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Budget Responsibility. (2017, January). Fiscal sustainability report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2015). Taking power back. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research. (2015). Trust in government: 1958–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, B. (2011). Re-imagining government: Public leadership and management in challenging times. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Varraich, A. (2017). Making sense of corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Opera House. (2016). Annual reports 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2010). The theory of moral sentiments. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (2016). The ethics of influence: Government in the age of behavioural science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Opera House. (2015). Annual report 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2014). The power to create. RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2016). 21st century enlightenment revisited. RSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetlock, P., & Gardner, D. (2015). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, J., & Rich, M. (2018). Truth decay. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, Rand.org.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Council of Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK

    Barry Quirk

Authors
  1. Barry Quirk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Quirk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Helen Dickinson

  2. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Catherine Needham

  3. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Catherine Mangan

  4. Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Helen Sullivan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Quirk, B. (2019). Empathy, Ethics and Efficiency: Twenty First Century Capabilities for Public Managers. In: Dickinson, H., Needham, C., Mangan, C., Sullivan, H. (eds) Reimagining the Future Public Service Workforce. SpringerBriefs in Political Science. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1480-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1480-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1479-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1480-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation