Having proposed an ex-ante framework of institutional convening as seen through the lens of power asymmetries and formulating four clear and lucid research questionnaires and propositions, the author throws light on the methodology, design and methods adopted in this research. The methodology followed is interpretive and qualitative (reflexive) in nature as the research questions relate to ‘why’ and ‘how’ rather than ‘what’ and ‘when’. Four cases pertaining to different government programmes were selected from a population of 110 case studies of successful institutional convening following purposive sampling technique. The case studies related to women empowerment, total sanitation campaign, eradication of child labour, and an anti-liquor drive in some of the least developed villages of Odisha. They were developed using Eisenhardt’s methodology for case research.
- Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC)
- powerPower Asymmetries
- Institutional Champion
- Gram Panchayats (GPs)
- Power dynamicsPower Dynamics
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Baker, M. (2001). Selecting a research methodology. The Marketing Review, 1, 373–397.
Baker, M. J. (2002). Research methods. The Marketing Review, 3(2), 167–193.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–776.
Berg, B. L. (2004). Methods for the social sciences, qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson Education.
Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Penguin.
Bruyn, S. (1966). The human perspective in sociology: The methodology of participant observation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. England: Gower.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical Pedagogy & the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. London: Sage.
Dul, J., & Hak, T. (2007). Case study methodology in business research. London: Routledge.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities & Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Evered, R., & Louis, M. (1981). Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside”. Academy of Management Review, 6(3), 385–395.
Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Gephart, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 454–462.
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gerson, K., & Horowitz, R. (2002). Observation and interviewing: Options and choices in qualitative research. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 199–224). London: Sage.
Gherardi, S., & Turner, B. (1987). Real men don’t collect soft data (Working Paper). Universita di Trento: Dipartimento di Politicia Sociale.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1997). Composing qualitative research: Crafting theoretical points from qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goulding, C. (2002). Grounded theory: A practical guide for management, business and market researchers. London: Sage.
Gummesson, E. (2003). All research is interpretive. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 18(6/7), 482–492.
Hartley, J. (2004). Case study research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage.
Hendry, J. R. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 79–99.
Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview: Qualitative research methods series 37. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. London: Sage.
Hudson, L., & Ozanne, J. L. (1988). Alternative ways of selling knowledge in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 508–521.
Keats, D. (2000). Interviewing: A practical guide for students and professionals. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kvale, S. (1989). Issues of validity in qualitative research. Lund: Chartwell Bratt.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lukes, S. (Ed.). (1986). Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mason. J. (2002). Qualitative interviewing: Asking, listening and interpreting. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 225–241). London: Sage.
McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). London: Sage.
Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). An emerging strategy of ‘direct’ research’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 582–589.
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morse, J. M., Barett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. New York: Pearson International Edition.
Onwuegbuzi, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Perry, C., & Brown, L. (1999). Realism rules ok: Scientific paradigms in marketing research. Irish Marketing Review, 12(2), 16–23.
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed.). England: Pearson Education Ltd.
Scholz, R., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. London: Sage.
Schwandt, T. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Selltiz, C., Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M., Cook, S. W. (1959). Research methods in social relations. In Society for the psychological study of social issues. NewYork: Holt, Rinchart and Winston.
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk text and interaction. London: Sage.
Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491–503.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). Ethnography and culture. The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston: Florida.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1997). Institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (pp. 175–190). London: Sage.
Toren, C. (1996). Ethnography: Theoretical background. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Leicester: The British Psychological Society.
Van Maanen, J. (1979). The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 539–550.
Warwick, D. (1973). Survey research and participant observation: A benefit-cost analysis. In D. Warwick & S. Osherson (Eds.), Comparative research methods. Englewood: Prentice Hall.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense making in organizations (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weick, K. E. (2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14–19.
Wilkinson, S. (2004). Focus group research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 177–199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research design and methods (Applied social) (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Rights and permissions
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patnaik, A. (2019). Research Methodology, Design and Methods. In: Institutional Change and Power Asymmetry in the Context of Rural India. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1301-1_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1300-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1301-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)