Advertisement

Balancing Local Concerns and Global Views: Western Administrative Theory in China’s Reform Practices

  • Leizhen Zang
Chapter

Abstract

China’s five-yearly governmental restructuring has always taken place in lockstep with the CPC (Communist Party of China) national congress. Moreover, the theme of every administrative reform in the past three decades has complied with that of theoretical research by foreign scholars during the same period. The Chinese government draws lessons from theories of foreign public administration to explore ways to reform its practices. By means of evaluating the gains and losses of the Chinese government in the above-mentioned process, this chapter points out that theories of Western public administration meet local challenges while contributing to China’s reform practices. Through their analyses, the chapter uses China’s practices as examples to highlight the balance between local concerns and global views and to suggest how scholars can better advise governments in the process of administrative reforms in other developing countries.

References

  1. Almond GA, Verba S (2015) The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrew C, Goldsmith M (1998) From local government to local governance—and beyond? Int Polit Sci Rev 19:101–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews M (2013) The limits of institutional reform in development: changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batley R, Larbi G (2004) The changing role of government: the reform of public services in developing countries. Springer, BirminghamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brinkerhoff DW, Brinkerhoff JM (2015) Public sector management reform in developing countries: perspectives beyond NPM orthodoxy. Public Adm Dev 35:222–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns JP (2000) Public sector reform and the state: the case of China. Public Adm Q 24:419–436Google Scholar
  7. Caulfield JL (2006) The politics of bureau reform in sub-Saharan Africa. Public Adm Dev 26:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen AJ, Pan SL, Zhang J, Huang WW, Zhu S (2009) Managing e-government implementation in China: a process perspective. Inf Manag 46:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen T, Lisheng D, Painter M (2008) Administrative reform in China’s central government—how muchlearning from the West’? Int Rev Adm Sci 74:351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen T, Dong L, Painter M, Walker RM (2012) Imitating the West? Evidence on administrative reform from the upper echelons of Chinese provincial government. Public Adm Rev 72:798–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dent M (2005) Post-new public management in public sector hospitals? The UK, Germany and Italy. Pol Polit 33:623–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derlien HU (1992) Observations on the state of comparative administration research in Europe Italy? Ese provincial government. Governance 5:279–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickovick JT (2014) Decentralization in Africa: the paradox of state strength. Lynne Rienner Publishers, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong L, Christensen T, Painter M (2010) A case study of China’s administrative reform: the importation of the super-department. Am Rev Public Adm 40:170–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esty DC (2006) Good governance at the supranational scale: globalizing administrative law. Yale Law J 115:1490–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foster V (2005) Ten years of water service reform in Latin America : toward an Anglo-French model. Victorian Picturesque the Colonial Gardens of William SangsterGoogle Scholar
  17. Grindle MS (2004) Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance 17(4):525–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haque MS, Turner M (2013) Knowledge-building in Asian public administration: an introductory overview. Public Adm Dev 33:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hart-Landsberg M (2011) The Chinese reform experience: a critical assessment. Rev Radic Polit Econ 43:56–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hood C (2000) Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. Int Public Manag J 3:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikenberry GJ (1986) The irony of state strength: comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970s. Int Organ 40:105–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kettl DF (2000) Public administration at the millennium: the state of the field. J Public Adm Res Theory 10:7–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin JY, Liu Z (2000) Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in China. Econ Dev Cult Chang 49:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma J, Zhang Z (2009) Remaking the Chinese administrative state since 1978: the double-movements perspective. Graduate School of Public Administration Seoul National University 23:225Google Scholar
  25. MacFarquhar R, Fairbank JK (1991) The Cambridge history of China. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ngok K, Zhu G (2007) Marketization, globalization and administrative reform in China: a zigzag road to a promising future. Int Rev Adm Sci 73:217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Popper KS (2012) The open society and its enemies. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider BR, Heredia B (2003) Reinventing Leviathan: the politics of administrative reform in developing countries. North-South Center Press, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  29. Smoke P (2015) Managing public sector decentralization in developing countries: moving beyond conventional recipes. Public Adm Dev 35:250–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strayer JR (1963) The historical experience of nation-building in Europe. In: Nation-building. Atherton Press, New York, pp 17–26Google Scholar
  31. Su TT, Walker RM, Xue L (2013) Reform and transition in public administration theory and practice in Greater China. Public Adm 91:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waldo D (1955) The study of public administration. Рипол Классик, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  33. Weaver RK, Rockman BA (2010) Do institutions matter?: government capabilities in the United States and abroad. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Xue L, Zhong K (2012) Domestic reform and global integration: public administration reform in China over the last 30 years. Int Rev Adm Sci 78:284–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leizhen Zang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Public Policy and ManagementUniversity of Chinese Academy of ScienceBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations