Skip to main content

Theoretical Basis of Writing Portfolio Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Portfolio Assessment for the Teaching and Learning of Writing

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

In this chapter, I will thoroughly discuss the theoretical foundation of writing portfolio assessment from two major perspectives: transformation of writing instruction and evolution of writing assessment in the past three decades. Second, I will describe the three assessment paradigms, namely psychometric, teacher-based and individualized paradigms which theoretically underpin the use of indirect tests, direct tests and performance assessments in the history of writing assessment, respectively. Third, I will systematically review the trends, outcomes and impacts of portfolio assessment in the contexts of L1/L2 composition and educational assessment research. Afterwards, the relationship between the arrival of writing portfolio assessment and global assessment reform movement is further explored and synthesized to enrich key stakeholders’ understanding of the theoretical and pedagogical contributions made by the portfolio approach. Finally, I will examine the possible tensions and challenges when writing portfolio assessment is introduced in a larger examination-oriented culture such as Hong Kong. The chapter ends with a group activity about developing a portfolio programme and a reflection task on examining the issues of direct tests and performance assessment of writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aydin, S. (2010). EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping. Assessing Writing, 15(3), 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belanoff, P., & Dickson, M. (Eds.). (1991). Portfolios: Process and product. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, S. (1995). Portfolio expectations: Possibilities and limits. Assessing Writing, 2(2), 117–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, R. (1993). The place of portfolios in our changing views of writing assessment. In R. E. Bennett & W. C. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2011). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D., & Harfitt, G. (2013). Innovation in secondary education: A case of curriculum reform in Hong Kong. In K. Hyland & L. L. C. Wong (Eds.), Innovation and change in English language education (pp. 172–185). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanave, C. P. (2004). Controversies in second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2006). EFL instruction and assessment with portfolios: A case study in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal, 8(1), 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crusan, D. (2010). Assessment in the second language writing classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: The University Of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, D. (2007). Views from the chalkface: English language school-based assessment in Hong Kong. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4(1), 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, D. (2013). Innovation in assessment: Common misconceptions and problems. In K. Hyland & L. L. C. Wong (Eds.), Innovation and change in English language education (pp. 263–275). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, H. R., Hawe, E., & Parr, J. (2011). Enacting assessment for learning: The beliefs practice nexus. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (2014). Challenging conceptions of assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 325–336). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1986). Portfolios as a substitute for proficiency examinations. College Composition and Communication, 37(3), 336–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1997). Reflections on an explosion: Portfolios in the 90s and beyond. In K. Yancey & I. Weiser (Eds.), Situating portfolios: Four perspectives (pp. 21–33). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gearhart, M., & Herman, J. L. (1998). Portfolio assessment: Whose work is it? Issues in the use of classroom assignments for accountability. Educational Assessment, 5(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). The scope of writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 8(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (2006). Feedback in portfolio-based writing courses. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing contexts and issues (pp. 140–161). London: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The impact of testing practices on teaching: Ideologies and alternatives. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 487–504). Norwell, MA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (1993). Questioning assumptions about portfolio-based assessment. College Composition and Communication, 44(2), 176–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamp-Lyons, L., & Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: Issues for research, theory and practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S. T. (2009). Promoting self-assessment strategies: An electronic portfolio approach. Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huot, B. (2002). (Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and researching writing (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australia story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2013). Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback. Assessing Writing, 18(2), 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2015a). Convergence and divergence of process and portfolio approaches to L2 writing instruction: Issues and implications. RELC Journal, 46(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2015b). Feedback about self-regulation: Does it remain an ‘unfinished business’ in portfolio assessment of writing? TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 402–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2016a). Assessment as learning: Examining a cycle of teaching, learning, and assessment of writing in the portfolio-based classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1900–1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2016b). Implementing assessment for learning in a Confucian context: The case of Hong Kong 2004–14. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 756–771). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2017). Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice. Assessing Writing, 31, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2018). Promoting self-reflection in writing: A showcase portfolio approach. In A. Burns & J. Siegel (Eds.), International perspectives on teaching skills in ELT (pp. 219–231). London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R., & Lee, I. (2010). Balancing the dual functions of portfolio assessment. ELT Journal, 64(1), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2006). Expanding horizons and unresolved conundrums: Language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2010). The impact of portfolio-based writing assessment on EFL writing development of Chinese learners. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y. F. (2010). Implementing reflective portfolios for promoting autonomous learning among EFL college students in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolio plus: A critical guide to alternative assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., & Smith, M. A. (1999). Creating a climate for portfolios. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (Eds.), Evaluating writing: The role of teachers’ knowledge about text, learning and culture (pp. 325–343). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S., & Grant, B. (1996). Portfolio approaches to assessment: Breakthrough or more of the same? In E. White, W. Lutz, & S. Kamusikiri (Eds.), Assessment of writing: Politics, policies and practices (pp. 284–300). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, B., & August, B. (2002). Using portfolios to assess the writing of ESL students: A powerful alternative? Journal of Second Language Writing, 11(1), 49–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C. (2005). Second language writing expertise. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in language learning and teaching (pp. 128–149). Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, W. (1998). An overview of writing assessment: Theory, research and practice. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, N. A., & Moeller, A. J. (2012). Increasing self-regulated learning through the LinguaFolio. Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 330–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricky Lam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lam, R. (2018). Theoretical Basis of Writing Portfolio Assessment. In: Portfolio Assessment for the Teaching and Learning of Writing. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1174-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1174-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1173-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1174-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics