Investigating Motivational and Usability Issues of mHealth Wellness Apps for Improved User Experience

  • Kalimullah KhanEmail author
  • Sushmitha Donthula
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 797)


In recent years, the evolution of information and communication technology has led to considerable changes in the fields of health care, nutrition, and physical fitness. Due to recently created technologies and improvements made in smartphones, tablets and applications have led to a branch in eHealth called mHealth. The purpose of mHealth applications is to make the lives of people easier by controlling and monitoring several aspects of their day-to-day activities and by providing services in the respective fields irrespective of place. For managing one’s own fitness and health, usability issues and motivational aspects related to the interaction design of an mHealth application plays a pivotal role, if not addressed properly. The aim is to explore how these issues can be measured and evaluated for mHealth wellness applications to ensure a healthy lifestyle. In addition, the results of this research are expected to support developers in understanding the needs and expectations of the users while using these applications.


mHealth Usability Activio Wellness Motivation 


  1. 1.
    Olla P, Shimskey C (2015) mHealth taxonomy: a literature survey of mobile health applications. Health Technol (Berl). 4(4):299–308. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khan K (2016) Investigating motivational and usability issues of mHealth wellness apps for peoples to ensure satisfaction : Exploratory StudyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sousa PS, Sabugueiro D, Felizardo V, Couto R, Pires I, Garcia NM (2015) mHealth sensors and applications for personal aid. In: Springer International Publishing Switzerland 265–281. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mirkovic J, Kaufman DR, Ruland CM (2014) Supporting cancer patients in illness management: usability evaluation of a mobile app. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2(3):e33. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Larsson M (2013) Traceability in healthcare innovation maintaining the relations between needs and solutions [Elektronisk Resurs].$file/Larsson_lic.pdf%5Cn
  6. 6.
    Jokela T, Iivari N, Matero J, Karukka M (2003) The Standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability : analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO. Design 46:53–60.
  7. 7.
    Kalimullah K, Sushmitha D (2017) Influence of design elements in mobile applications on user experience of elderly people. Procedia Comput Sci 113:352–359. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindquist AM, Johansson PE, Petersson GI, Saveman B-I, Nilsson GC (2008) The use of the personal digital assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review. J Med Internet Res 10(4):e31. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chi EH (2009) A position paper on “Living Laboratories”: rethinking ecological designs and experimentation in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interact Pt I. 5610:597–605Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan Z, Adnan M (2009) Usability evaluation of web-based GIS Applications. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on information integration and web-based applications and services—iiWAS ’09. (January):557.
  11. 11.
    Kamana M Investigating usability issues of mHealth apps for elderly peopleGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bakhtyar S, Afridi Q (2010) Performance evaluation of two different usability evaluation methods in the context of collaborative writing systems. 2010;(January).$file/MasterThesisFinal.pdf
  13. 13.
    Farrell S, Nielsen J (2014) User experience careers
  14. 14.
    Boulos MNK, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R (2011) How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 10:24. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Handel MJ (2011) MHealth (mobile health)-using apps for health and wellness. Explor J Sci Heal 7(4):256–261. Scholar
  16. 16.
    LoPresti M, Appelboom G, Bruyère O, Reginster J-Y, Klug E, Connolly ES (2014) Patient engagement in clinical research through mobile technology. Clin Pract 11(6):549–551. Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva PA, Nunes F (2010) 3 × 7 usability testing guidelines for older adults. In: Proceedings 3rd Mex Work Human-Computer Interaction 2:1–8Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sousa PS, Sabugueiro D, Felizardo V, Couto R, Pires I, Garcia NM (2015) Mobile health: a technology road map. In: Adibi S, (ed) Cham: Springer International Publishing pp 265–281. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Braun V, Clarke V (2015) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006(3):77–101. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ComputingBlekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlskronaSweden

Personalised recommendations