Advertisement

The Italian Response to Sustainability in Built Environment: The Match Between Law and Technical Assessment

  • Fabio ManzoneEmail author
  • Manuela Rebaudengo
  • V. Lorenzo ZaccaroEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 797)

Abstract

During these last years, increasing consideration has been given to the concept of sustainability seen in a broad perspective, including several fields of the human activity. The construction industry represents one of the most important sectors to focus on in terms of sustainability; therefore, its main challenge nowadays has shifted from a quantitative to a qualitative aspect of the production. This happens at both international and national levels; still sustainability is an issue that has a relative weight, depending on the specific needs of the area, the political choices of the country and its socio-economic background. The paper analyses the Italian framework both in terms of law and technical assessment of built environment sustainability. Section 1 shows how nowadays the inner political line and membership in the European Union lead Italy to focus on improving the quality of the buildings: such quality concept could be called “sustainability”, since this word includes various dimensions. Section 2 technically explains the environmental, social and economical dimensions of sustainability and the attempt to balance them in a holistic perspective. Section 3 depicts the legislative approach to enhance sustainability. Section 4 focuses on the Italian background with its recent regulatory changes, which have introduced the mandatory application of the Minimum Environmental Criteria (MEC) in public building’s construction.

Keywords

Minimum environmental criteria Sustainability BIM approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Ashford NA, Hall RP (2011) The importance of regulation-induced innovation for sustainable development. Sustainability 3:270–292.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bastmeijer K, Verschuuren J (2005) NGO-business collaborations and the law: sustainability, limitations of the law, and the changing relationship between companies and NGOs. In: Demirag I (ed) Corporate social responsibility, accountability and governance. Global Perspectives, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, 2005, pp 314–329Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bragança L, Mateus R, Koukkari H (2010) Building sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:2010–2023.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2072010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dernbach JC, Mintz JA (2011) Environmental laws and sustainability: an introduction. Sustainability 3:531–540.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3030531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework (ISO 14040); ISO: Geneva, Switzerland (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Federal office for building and regional planning, guideline for sustainable building, http://www.iisbe.org/iisbe/gbpn/documents/policies/guidelines/Germany_guideline_SB.pdf (2001)
  7. 7.
    Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latour G (2017) Decreto Bim. il testo firmato e tutte le scadenze per le PA, edilizia e territorio 6 dicembre 2017, http://www.ediliziaeterritorio.ilsole24ore.com/art/lavori-pubblici/2017–12-05/decreto-bim-la-gazzetta-ecco-testo-finale-e-tutte-scadenze-le-pa-175422.php?uuid=AE0fKjND
  9. 9.
    Piantanida P, Rebaudengo M (2017) Environmental awarding criteria in Italian tenders for building works in 4th international multidisciplinary scientific conference on social sciences and arts SGEM 2017, Book 1, Vol 2, 465–472 pp, ISBN 978-619-7408-14-0/ ISSN 2367-5659, 24–30 August, 2017,  https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/12/s02.057 (2017)
  10. 10.
    Rebaudengo M, Fabrizio E (2017) Buildings minimum environmental criteria and energy issues. In: 17th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM 2017, ISBN 978-619-7408-29-4/ISSN 1314-2704, 27–29 November, 2017, Vol 17, Issue 63, 463–470 pp;  https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017h/63/s26.059
  11. 11.
    Rebaudengo M, Manzone F, Caldera C, Prizzon F (2017) Environmental quantity survey for buildings GPP requirements. In: 17th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM 2017, ISBN 978-619-7408-29-4/ISSN 1314-2704, 27–29 November, 2017, Vol 17, Issue 63, 853–860 pp;  https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017h/63/s27.106
  12. 12.
    Rebaudengo M, Prizzon F (2017) Assessing the investments sustainability after the new code on public contracts, in computational science and its applications—ICCSA 2017. In: 17th international conference, Trieste, Italy, July 3–6, 2017, Proceedings, Part VI, Lecture notes in computer science vol no 10409, pg 473–484, ed. Springer, ISBN: 978-3-319-62406-8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ross A (2010) It’s time to get serious—why legislation is needed to make sustainable development a reality in the UK. Sustainability 2:1101–1127.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2041101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smiciklas J, de Jager L, Cucchietti F, et al (20152) Sustainable buildings, ITU 2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2013) Sustainable building and construction: facts and figures, in sustainable building and construction, April–September 2003, pp 5–98Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and PlanningPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations