Advertisement

Using Service-Dominant Logic to Build Empathy for Design Thinking in a Health Service Delivery Environment

  • Masiya Alex MarufuEmail author
  • Alta van der Merwe
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 797)

Abstract

Everywhere in the world, governments consider the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to drive improvements in service delivery with wide-ranging e-government initiatives. The health sector in particular faces the twin challenge of growing populations requiring services and dwindling resources in the face of reduced funding. Design thinking has over the last 20 years developed into a “design paradigm” that can assist service providers to craft solutions to problems that take into account the needs and views of stakeholders involved. Using a design science research approach underpinned by a pragmatist philosophy, this study develops a model for consolidating empathy input in a design thinking process.

Keywords

Co-creation Design science research Design thinking e-Government e-Health Service-dominant logic 

References

  1. 1.
    Dixon A, Figueras J, Kutzin J (2002) Funding health care: options for Europe. McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plattner Hasso, Meinel Christoph, Leifer Larry (2012) Understanding Innovation design thinking research: studying co-creation in practice. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandrasekhar CP, Ghosh J (2001) Information and communication technologies and health in low income countries: the potential and the constraints. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(9)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wickramasinghe NS, Fadalla AMA, Geislet E, Schaffer JL (2005) A framework for assessing e-health preparedness. J Electron Healthcare 1(3):316–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown Tim, Wyatt Jocelyn (2010) Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Rev 8(1):30–35Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown T (2009) Change by Design.: HarperBusinessGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harvard Business ReviewGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper Rachel, Junginger Sabine, Lockwood Thomas (2009) Design thinking and design management: a research and practice perspective. Design Manage Rev 20(2):46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Union (2014) Design for Innovation: co-creation as a new way of value creationGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) A new dominant logic. J Marketing pp 1–17Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2000) Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review 78(1):1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2017) Service-dominant logic 2025. Int J Res Mark 34(1):46–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bovaird T, Loeffler E (2013) University of BirmighamGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terblanche NS (2014) Some theoretical perspectives of co-creation and co-production of value by customers. Acta Commercii 14(2):1–8Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins Hillary (2013) Can design thinking still add value?. DMI, SummerGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beckman SL, Barry M (2007) Innovation as a learning process: embedding design thinking. California Manage Rev 50(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics DepartmentUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations