Skip to main content

Freely Drifting Small-Satellite Swarms for Sensor Networks in the Arctic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology


Satellite communications have been widely used to provide connectivity around the world. However, regions such as the Arctic still have limited coverage, despite the need to monitor this region. Currently, several sensors are deployed in the Arctic, but are limited by poor and costly connectivity. Constellations of small satellites, or CubeSats, have been proposed in order to overcome this lack of connectivity, offering an alternative to typical satellite solutions. However, these constellations face challenges in their deployment and in orbital station keeping. In this paper, we propose a simpler deployment of small satellites, in the form of a drifting swarm, integrated with networking protocols widely used in the Internet of Things (IoT). A realistic setup is considered, evaluating this solution taking into account the position of sensor nodes, ground stations and the dynamics of such a drifting swarm. The topology evolution of the small-satellite swarm is studied and all its link characteristics are emulated using a real network stack and protocols. The obtained results prove the feasibility of the proposed solution and show that a freely drifting satellite swarm, with three small satellites, outperforms more costly solutions. Our results also show that by using standardised networking protocols, a satellite architecture with two ground stations connected over the Internet, can reduce the average end-to-end time of a request from 88 to 38 min. The obtained results motivate the use of freely drifting swarms of small satellites for reaching sensor nodes in remote locations, as well as the use of IoT protocols for improved performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. 1.

  2. 2.

  3. 3.

  4. 4.

    Since the TLEs strictly are not valid for more than a few weeks, the resulting orbits must be interpreted as representative examples only.

  5. 5.


  1. Aalborg University (2014) AAUSAT3., online

  2. Berge J (2017) Mare incognitum—arctic abc project summary, online, nFR projects 244319 and 245923

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berge J, Geoffroy M, Johnsen G, Cottier F, Bluhm B, Vogedes D (2016) Ice-tethered observational platforms in the arctic ocean pack ice. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(23):494–499.,

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkeland R (2014) An overview of existing and future satellite systems for arctic communication. In: Proceedings of ESA small satellites systems and services 2014

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birkeland R (2014) Proposal for a satellite communication payload for sensor networks in the arctic area. In: Proceedings of the 65th international astronautical congress

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birkeland R (2017) Freely drifting cubesat constellations for improving coverage for arcticsensor networks. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6,

  7. Birkeland R, Palma D, Zolich A (2017) Integrated smallsats and unmanned vehicles for networking in remote locations. In: Proceedings of the 68th international astronautical congress

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bormann C, Hartke K, Shelby Z (2014) The constrained application protocol (CoAP). RFC 7252,,

  9. Burleigh SC, Farrell S, Ramadas M (2008) Licklider transmission protocol specification. RFC 5326,,

  10. Chakrabarti S, Montenegro G, Droms R, Woodyatt J (2017) IPv6 over low-power wireless personal area network (6LoWPAN) ESC dispatch code points and guidelines. RFC 8066,,

  11. Foundation PS (2017) Python 3.5.3 documentation, online,

  12. Graphics A (2016) Stk. Online, Accessed Apr 2016

  13. Insider T (2015) Spacex is working on a ’pizza box’ that should scare your internet company. Online,

  14. Iridium Communications Inc (2014) Iridium communications. Accessed 15 Dec 2014

  15. ITU (2015) Technical characteristics for a VHF data exchange system in the VHF maritime mobile band., recommendation ITU-R M.2092-0

  16. Kelso DT (1998) Frequently asked questions: two-line element set format. Available at

  17. Merkel D (2014) Docker: Lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux J 2014(239). 2600241

  18. Norwegian Space Centre (2015) Satkom i Arktis (ASK). Online,\Satkom-i-Arktis-ASK. Accessed June 2015

  19. OneWeb (2015) Oneweb homepage, online, Accessed Oct 2015

  20. Palma D, Zolich A, Jiang Y, Johansen TA (2017) Unmanned aerial vehicles as data mules: An experimental assessment. IEEE Access 5:24716–24726, 2769658

  21. Puig-Suari J, Zohar G, Leveque K (2013) Deployment of CubeSat constellations utilizing current launch opportunities. In: 27th annual AIAA/USU conference on small satellites

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rhodes B (2015) Pyephem home page. Accessed Oct 2015

  23. Salopek D, Vasić V, Zec M, Mikuc M, Vašarević M, Končar V (2014) A network testbed for commercial telecommunications product testing. In: 2014 22nd international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks (SoftCOM), pp 372–377,

  24. Sanctis MD, Cianca E, Araniti G, Bisio I, Prasad R (2016) Satellite communications supporting internet of remote things. IEEE Internet Things J 3(1):113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott K, Burleigh SC (2007) Bundle protocol specification. RFC 5050.,

  26. Tanganelli G, Vallati C, Mingozzi E (2015) Coapthon: easy development of coap-based IoT applications with python. In: 2015 IEEE 2nd world forum on internet of things (WF-IoT), pp 63–68,

  27. Thubert P, Hui J (2011) Compression format for IPv6 datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4 Based networks. RFC 6282,

  28. Whitaker J (2017) Basemap Matplotlib Toolkit 1.0.8 documentation, online, http: //

  29. Zohar GG (2013) Ad-hoc regional coverage constellations of cubesats using secondary launches. Master’s thesis, Faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was partially funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant Agreement No. 699924, SINet.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Birkeland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Birkeland, R., Palma, D. (2019). Freely Drifting Small-Satellite Swarms for Sensor Networks in the Arctic. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 797. Springer, Singapore.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1164-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1165-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics