Skip to main content

The Responsive Tribunal: Robust Processes; Fair and Timely Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Responsive Judge

Part of the book series: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice ((IUSGENT,volume 67))

  • 662 Accesses

Abstract

Tribunals resolve millions of disputes each year, using final binding decision-making, and dispute resolution processes such as mediation . This chapter explores practical ways in which tribunals can be responsive to participants in the process. This includes being responsive to the materials presented by participants. Strategies are canvassed, such as appropriately using discretion; weighing and balancing information ; encouraging agreement ; and empowering participants without prejudicing others. Process design is discussed as an important aspect of responsiveness, as well as the effects of good communication, exploring participant interests, and clarifying facts and the law. Providing opportunities for participants to resolve their dispute by agreement and the factors to consider in dispute resolution processes are outlined. Case studies are provided that illustrate real world examples. The authors argue a tribunal can generate a robust process, which is not only fair and delivers timely outcomes but also satisfies participants’ needs by paying attention to the factors discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agius v State of South Australia (No. 4) (2017) FCA 361

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander N (2011) The Mediation Meta-Model—the realities of mediation practice. Altern Dispute Resolut Bull 12(6):126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman-Robinson C, Shurven H (2017) Working with strong negative emotions in dispute resolution processes: boiling blood and frozen fear. Altern Dispute Resolut Law Bull 4:59

    Google Scholar 

  • Calloway D (2010) Using mindfulness practice to work with emotions. Nevada Law J 10:338–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas K, Coburn C (2014) Attitude and response to emotion in dispute resolution: the experience of mediators. Flinders Law J 16:111–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R, Shapiro D (2005) Beyond reason: using emotions as you negotiate. Viking Penguin, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Genn H, Thomas C (2013) Tribunal decision-making: an empirical study. Nuffield Foundation. http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/tribunal-decision-making. Accessed 1 Sept 2017

  • Mnookin RM, Susskind LE (eds) (1999) Negotiating on behalf of others. Sage Publications, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore C (2003) The mediation process: practical strategies for resolving conflict. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet T, Syme GJ (2017) No way to build a highway: law, social justice research and the Beeliar Wetlands. Environ Plann Law J 34:162–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph P (2016) The psychology of conflict: mediating in a diverse world. Bloomsbury, Place

    Google Scholar 

  • Re Jokai Tea Holdings Ltd. (1993) 1 All ER 630

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander F, Rozdeiczer L (2006) Matching cases and dispute resolution procedures: detailed analysis leading to a mediation-centered approach. Harvard Negot Law Rev 11:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius J (2017) BATNAs in negotiation: common errors and three kinds of “no”. Negot J 33(2):89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shurven H, Berman-Robinson C (2016) ADR process design: considerations for ADR practitioners and party advisors. Australas Dispute Resolut J 27:140–149

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Shurven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shurven, H., Berman-Robinson, C. (2018). The Responsive Tribunal: Robust Processes; Fair and Timely Outcomes. In: Sourdin, T., Zariski, A. (eds) The Responsive Judge. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 67. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1022-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1023-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics