Skip to main content

Modular Configuration for Customizable PSS

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Customization-Oriented Design of Product-Service System

Abstract

Configuration is an efficient method for rapid PSS customization. However, the previous service configuration methods may produce a large number of feasible solutions, especially when there are more module instances or fewer configuration constraints. This will increase the burden of service solution screening and reduce the efficiency of service delivery. To solve this problem, Song and Chan (2015) develop a multi-objective optimization model for configuration of the PSS. The optimization model considers service performance, service cost and response time at the same time, and it is solved with non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II) to obtain a set of optimal configuration solutions. In this way, the manufacturer can flexibly satisfy customer needs with a module-based PSS at lower cost. The PSS configuration optimization model is expected to enhance the customization ability of the service provider, because it can respond to customer requirements timely by providing the customized PSS. The rough TOPSIS approach developed by Song et al. (2013b) can then be used to evaluate and select the proper PSS concept from the configured PSS set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. A. M. T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., & Otto, K. N. (2000). Modular platform-based product family design. In ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference. Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, L. P., Tor, S. B., & Zhai, L. Y. (1999). A rough-set-based approach for classification and rule induction. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 15(6), 438–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. K., Shu, J., Simpson, T. W., & Kumara, S. R. (2010). A module-based service model for mass customization: Service family design. IIE Transactions, 43(3), 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C. (1990). Handbok i QFD. Sverige, Stockholm: Mekanförbundets förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Wang, L., & Sun, Y. (2012). Configuration of product extension services in servitisation using an ontology-based approach. International Journal of Production Research, 50(22), 6469–6488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W., Ming, X., Han, Y., & Wu, Z. (2013a). A rough set approach for evaluating vague customer requirement of industrial product-service system. International Journal of Production Research, 51(22), 6681–6701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W., Ming, X., & Han, Y. (2014). Prioritising technical attributes in QFD under vague environment: A rough-grey relational analysis approach. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5528–5545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W., & Chan, F. T. (2015). Multi-objective configuration optimization for product-extension service. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, W., Ming, X., & Wu, Z. (2013b). An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments. Journal of Engineering Design, 24(5), 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, N., & Deb, K. (1994). Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 2(3), 221–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2008). A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37(5–6), 613–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2009). A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(2), 222–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, L. Y., Khoo, L. P., & Zhong, Z. W. (2010). Towards a QFD-based expert system: A novel extension to fuzzy QFD methodology using rough set theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8888–8896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenyan Song .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Song, W. (2019). Modular Configuration for Customizable PSS. In: Customization-Oriented Design of Product-Service System. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0863-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics