Advertisement

An MCDM-Based Approach for Selecting the Best State for Tourism in India

  • Rashmi Rashmi
  • Rohit Singh
  • Mukesh Chand
  • Shwetank AvikalEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 741)

Abstract

In today’s era, there are many fastest growing industries in this world and Tourism is one of them. Tourism plays a crucial role in the economic growth and advance development of a Nation. India is one of the most well-liked tourist destinations in Asia. Tourism is one of the major sources of foreign exchange. It helps in the development of an international understanding of our culture and heritage. Every year thousands of foreigners come to India as a result of which we earn a lot of foreign exchange. Selection of best place for traveling is a decision-making problem based on a number of criteria that reflects the preferences of the traveler. In presented work, a Fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS approach has been proposed to solve above discussed problem. In this work., Fuzzy-AHP approach helps to evaluate the weight of different criteria and TOPSIS method helps to recognize the most favourable tourist place (states) all over the India and ranks each state accordingly.

Keywords

Tourism MCDM Fuzzy-AHP TOPSIS 

References

  1. 1.
    Matheison, A., Wall, G.: Tourism: Economic, Physical and Social Impacts. Longman, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, J.R., Chang, B.: The development of a tourism attraction model by using fuzzy theory. Math. Prob. Eng. pp. 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wu, W.-W.: Beyond travel & tourism competitiveness ranking using DEA, GST, ANN and Borda count. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(10), 12974–12982 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cracolici, M.F., Nijkamp, P.: The attractiveness and competitiveness of tourist destinations: a study of Southern Italian regions. Tour. Manag. 30, 336–344 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dellaert, B.G.C., Etterma, F., Lindh, C.: Multi-faceted tourist travel decisions: a constraint-based conceptual framework to describe tourist sequential choice of travel components. Tour. Manag. 19(4), 313–320 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohamad, D., Jamil, R.M.: A preference analysis model for selecting tourist destinations based on motivational factors: a case study in Kedah, Malaysia. Procedia—Social Behav. Sci. 65, 20–25 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, C.H., Tzeng, G.H., Lee, M.H.: Improving tourism policy implementation—The use of hybrid MCDM models. Tour. Manag. 33, 413–426 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hsu, T.K., Tsai, Y.F., Wu, H.H.: The preference analysis for tourist choice of destination: a case study of Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 30, 288–297 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, C.L., Bau, Y.P.: Establishing a multi-criteria evaluation structure for tourist beaches in Taiwan: a foundation for sustainable beach tourism. Ocean Coast. Manag. 121, 88–96 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alptekin, G.I., Buyukozkan, G.: An integrated case-based reasoning and MCDM system for web based tourism destination planning. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 2125–2132 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stauvermann, P.J., Kumar, R.R.: Productivity growth and income in the tourism sector: role of tourism demand and human capital investment. Tour. Manag. 61, 426–433 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saaty, T.L.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 15(3), 234–281 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ng, C.Y.: Evidential reasoning-based fuzzy AHP approach for the evaluation of design alternatives environmental performances. Appl. Soft Comput. 46, 381–397 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Avikal, S., Jain, R., Mishra, P.K.: A Kano model, AHP and M- TOPSIS method-based technique for disassembly line balancing problems under fuzzy environment. Appl. Soft Comput. pp. 519–525 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Terol, A.B., Parra, M.A., Fernández, V.C., Ibias, J.A.: Using TOPSIS for assessing the sustainability of government bond funds. Int. J. Manag. Sci. (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh, S., Mundepi, V., Hatwal, D., Raturi, V., Chand, M., Rashmi, Sharma, S., Avikal, S.: Selection of best state for tourism in India by fuzzy approach. Adv. Comput. Comput. Sci. pp. 549–557 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rashmi Rashmi
    • 1
  • Rohit Singh
    • 1
  • Mukesh Chand
    • 2
  • Shwetank Avikal
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringGraphic Era Hill UniversityDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Department of Supply Chain ManagementInfosysMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations