Advertisement

Digital Media, Cycles of Contention, and Urban Governance in China: Anti-PX Protests as an Example of the Sustainability of Environmental Activism

Chapter
  • 265 Downloads
Part of the ARI - Springer Asia Series book series (ARI, volume 7)

Abstract

Since the emergence of the environmental crisis in China in the early 1990s, environmental activism has emerged as a key type of digital activism as well as a major challenge to urban governance. While scholars have studied issues arising from digital activism in general and environmental activism in particular, most have failed to scrutinize possible interconnections among different instances of digitally mediated political contention. To advance such an understanding, this chapter employs the concept of “cycles of contention” – a concept helpful for investigating recurrent mechanism of protest in contemporary society. The study takes seven anti-petrochemical (anti-PX) environmental protests in China between 2007 and 2014 as cases. During the time, 54 in-depth interviews were conducted. The study finds that coverage in the traditional media, on the one hand, served to legitimize and to modularize these anti-PX protests, thereby facilitating the adoption of digital media as part of the repertoire of contention and helping to make political contention sustainable over the long run. The use of digital media, on the other hand, enabled protestors to diffuse contention widely and quickly and to learn from past experiences. The chapter concludes that, as a new challenge to urban governance, digitally mediated environmental activism is shaped by the specific communication ecology in China.

Keywords

Digital media Political activism Cycles of contention Repertoire of contention Environmental activism Urban governance Anti-PX protests China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author deeply appreciates comments from Klaus Bruhn Jensen, Jørgen Delman, Mattias Burell, Oscar Almén, and Ran Wei. This study has been funded by grants from the Carlsberg Foundation (CF14–0385), S. C. Van Fonden (reference numbers 1267, 1503), and Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy & Social Science Research Base (15JDCB05YB).

References

  1. Anduiza, E., Jensen, M. J., & Jorba, L. (2012). Digital media and political engagement worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC. (2014, April 2). China Maoming environmental protest violence condemned. Available via BBC. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-26849814. Accessed 22 Sep 2016.
  3. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Chang, M. (2013, May 17). Thousands protest Kunming PX plan. Available via Global Times. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/782252.shtml. Accessed 22 Sep 2016
  7. CNNIC. (2014, July). The 34th statistics report on internet development in China (July 2014). Available via CNNIC. http://www1.cnnic.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/201411/P020141102574314897888.pdf. Accessed 22 Sep 2016
  8. Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change. Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esarey, A., & Xiao, Q. (2011). Digital communication and political change in China. International Journal of Communication, 5, 298–319.Google Scholar
  10. FlorCruz, J. A. (2012, July 6). People power a sign of times in China’s internet age. Available via CNN. http://edition.cnn.com/2012/07/06/world/asia/china-shifang-protest-florcruz/. Accessed 22 Sep 2016.
  11. Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society. Information, Communication and Society, 9(2), 202–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldkorn, J. (2008, May 6). NIMBY protest hits Chengdu. Available via DANWEI. http://www.danwei.org/environmental_problems/nimby_protest_hits_chengdu.php. Accessed 22 Sep 2016.
  13. Hassid, J. (2012). Safety valve or pressure cooker. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 212–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herold, D. K., & de Seta, G. (2015). Through the looking glass. The Information Society, 31(1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu, Y. (2012). The internet and social mobilization in China. In L. FLF, L. Leung, J. L. Qiu, & C. DSC (Eds.), Frontiers in new media research (pp. 93–114). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Huang, R., & Sun, X. (2014). Weibo network, information diffusion and implications for collective action in China. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lan, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2007, May 29) Millions of Xiamen residents spread crazily the same SMS against high-pollution project. Available via Southern Metropolis Daily. http://news.hsw.cn/2007-05/29/content_6311487.htm. Accessed 22 Sep 2016.
  20. Lee, K., & Ho, M. (2014). The Maoming anti-PX protest of 2014. China Perspectives, 3, 33–39.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, J. (2013). Mobile communication, popular protests and citizenship in China. Modern Asian Studies, 47(3), 995–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, J. (2015). Communicating beyond information. Television & New Media, 16(6), 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, D., & Yan, S. (2012, October 29). Ningbo backs down from PX project. Available via Global Times. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/740943.shtml. Accessed 22 Sep 2016.
  24. McAdam, D. (1995). “Initiator” and “Spin-off” movements. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action (pp. 217–239). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McAdam, D., & Rucht, D. (1993). The cross-national diffusion of movement ideas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. G., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (2013). Cyberactivism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minkoff, D. C. (1997). The sequencing of social movements. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 779–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Brien, K. J. (1996). Rightful resistance. World Politics, 49(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. O’Brien, K. J. (2009). Popular protest in China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (2006). Rightful resistance in rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Qiu, J. L., & Bu, W. (2013). China ICT studies. China Review, 13(2), 123–152.Google Scholar
  34. Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using Respondent-Driven Sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sevastopulo, D. (2014, April 1). China PX plant protests spread to provincial capital Guangzhou. Financial Time. Available via http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/cf6594fa-b98d-11e3-957a-00144feabdc0.html - axzz3ZeGWgZ3k. Accessed 22 Sept 2016.
  36. Tarrow, S. G. (1993a). Cycles of collective action. Social Science History, 17(2), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tarrow, S. G. (1993b). Modular collective action and the rise of the social movement. Politics & Society, 21(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tarrow, S. G. (2010). Dynamics of diffusion. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements (pp. 204–219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in movement (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. The Center for Public Opinion Monitor. (2014). To guide the public opinion toward PX project in the Maoming protest. Public Opinion on Politics and Law, 114(14), 3–8.Google Scholar
  41. Thireau, I., & Linshan, H. (2003). The moral universe of aggrieved Chinese workers. The China Journal, 50, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain (pp. 1758–1834). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Traugott, M. (1995a). Recurrent patterns of collective action. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action (pp. 1–14). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Traugott, M. (1995b). Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  46. van de Donk, W., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (Eds.). (2004). Cyberprotest. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Wu, C. (2012). Micro-blog and the speech act of China’s middle class. Javnost-the Public, 19(2), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu, F., & Wen, B. (2015). Nongovernmental organizations and environmental protests. In P. G. Harris & G. Lang (Eds.), Routledge handbook of environment and society in Asia (pp. 105–119). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Xie, L., & Zhao, L. (2007). The power of mobile messaging. China Newsweek, 326(20), 16–17.Google Scholar
  50. Yang, G. (2009). The power of the Internet in China. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Yang, G. (2011). Technology and its contents. The Journal of Asian Studies, 70(4), 1043–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2008). Media, power, and protest in China. Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 9(2), 9–13.Google Scholar
  53. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Zeng, F. (2015). 环境抗争的扩散效应 (Diffusion effects of Chinese environmental contentions). Journal of Northwest Normal University, 52(3), 110–115.Google Scholar
  55. Zhao, D. (2010). Theorizing the role of culture in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 9(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhu, H. (2007, May 30). 百亿化工项目引发剧毒传闻 厦门果断叫停应对公共危机(Xiamen calls an abrupt halt to the million-cost petrochemical project to deal with the public crisis). Southern Weekend, p. A1.Google Scholar
  57. Zolberg, A. R. (1972). Moments of Madness. Politics & Society, 2(2), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media, Cognition and Communication & Centre for Communication and ComputingUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations