Learning Traces, Competence Assessment, and Causal Inference for English Composition
- 258 Downloads
It is widely acknowledged that writing is a process and should be taught as a process. However, it is still assessed as though it is a product. Educational technology makes now possible for teachers to become observers of the writing process of their students to discover how their writing competences (e.g., grammatical accuracy, topic flow, transition, and vocabulary usage) develop over time. The present research proposes an innovative technique to identify the actual drivers of writing performance through a formal causality framework, unleashing a new source of potential insights to scaffold more effectively the writing process and guarantee more reliable success at the end.
KeywordsAnalytics of writing process Causality Competence Big data Natural-language processing Learning analytics
This research is supported by the Industrial Research Chair and Discovery programs of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the internal research funding programs of Athabasca University, Canada.
- Boulanger, D., Seanosky, J., Clemens, C., Kumar, V., & Kinshuk. (2016). SCALE: A smart competence analytics solution for English writing. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 468–472). http://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.108.
- Boulanger, D., Seanosky, J., Pinnell, C., Bell, J., Kumar, V., & Kinshuk. (2016). SCALE: A competence analytics framework. In Y. Li, M. Chang, M. Kravcik, E. Popescu, R. Huang, Kinshuk, & N.-S. Chen (Eds.), State-of-the-art and future directions of smart learning (pp. 19–30). Singapore: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_3.Google Scholar
- Clemens, C. (2017). A causal model of writing competence (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://dt.athabascau.ca/jspui/handle/10791/233.
- Cramir, H. (1946). Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Guillot, C., Guillot, R., Kumar, V., & Kinshuk. (2016). MUSIX: Learning analytics in music teaching. In Y. Li, M. Chang, M. Kravcik, E. Popescu, R. Huang, Kinshuk, & N.-S. Chen (Eds.), State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning (pp. 269–273). Singapore: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_31.Google Scholar
- Johnson, P. M., Kou, H., Agustin, J., Chan, C., Moore, C., Miglani, J., … Doane, W. E. J. (2003). Beyond the personal software process: Metrics collection and analysis for the differently disciplined. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003 (pp. 641–646). http://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201249.
- Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel.Google Scholar
- Klein, D., & Manning, C. D. (2003). Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 423–430). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://doi.org/10.3115/1075096.1075150.
- Kumar, V., Kinshuk, Somasundaram, T., Harris, S., Boulanger, D., Seanosky, J., … Panneerselvam, K. (2015). An approach to measure coding competency evolution. In M. Chang & Y. Li (Eds.), Smart learning environments (pp. 27–43). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44447-4_2.Google Scholar
- Lewkow, N., Feild, J., Zimmerman, N., Riedesel, M., Essa, A., Boulanger, D., … Kode, S. (2016). A scalable learning analytics platform for automated writing feedback. In Proceedings of the 3rd (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 109–112). New York, NY, USA: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893380.
- Murray, D. M. (1972). Teach writing as a process not product. The Leaflet, 71, 11–14.Google Scholar
- Nasukawa, T., & Yi, J. (2003). Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (pp. 70–77).Google Scholar
- O’Rourke, S. T., Calvo, R. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Visualizing topic flow in students’ essays. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 4–15.Google Scholar
- Peirce, C. S., & Jastrow, J. (1884). On small differences in sensation.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. (1912). On the notion of cause. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 13, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4543833.
- Sampson, D., & Fytros, D. (2008). Competence models in technology-enhanced competence-based learning. In H. H. Adelsberger, Kinshuk, J. M. Pawlowski, & D. G. Sampson (Eds.), Handbook on information technologies for education and training (pp. 155–177). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74155-8_9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984065.
- Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013). Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP).Google Scholar
- Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press.Google Scholar
- Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 173–180). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://doi.org/10.3115/1073445.1073478.
- Verhelst, N., Van Avermaet, P., Takala, S., Figueras, N., & North, B. (2009). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Yi, J., Nasukawa, T., Bunescu, R., & Niblack, W. (2003). Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 427–434). http://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2003.1250949.