Advertisement

Cradle to Cradle®—Parquet for Generations: Respect Natural Resources and Offers Preservation for the Future

  • Ansgar Igelbrink
  • Albin KälinEmail author
  • Marko Krajner
  • Roman Kunič
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes book series (EFEPP)

Abstract

Indoor air quality matters in regard of health risks of indoor exposure to particulates. Small particulates indoor are 3–8 times higher than outdoor (Heimlich 2008). The air quality indoor suffers. Industrial products such as building materials, paints, furniture, textiles, flooring, and electronics are off-gazing and in general incorporate toxic ingredients. The environmental and human toxicology quality is a key factor for a healthy living environment. Health risks of indoor exposure to particulates matter in regard to quality of industrial produced products. Wood will certainly stay as one of the leading and the most preferable construction material in the future due to its environmental, local availability, and aesthetic characteristics. Nowadays, using wood in architecture is very fashionable. Research and developments in wood production as well as in wood construction will strongly form the future of sustainable development practically in all parts of the planet Earth. Wood today is trendy, fashionable, and one of the most accessible materials and has an aesthetic view with a natural look and a visual attractiveness, together with the smell, sound, and touch; natural wood is perceived as luxurious. Development could be seen also in façades, inside and other surfaces of modern structures which are increasingly being used. Sustainable luxury products incorporate extraordinary aesthetics, handle, care, function and in addition, to be sustainable need to be safe for humans, society, and the environment. Resources and natural resources are scare and need to be protected in changing the design of the products we use according Cradle to Cradle® principle ‘Remaking the way we make things’ and ‘Towards a circular economy.’ For companies, this implies entrepreneurship to tackle the large impact in change of behavior, culture, marketing and business models in closing the loop, and taking the goods back from the user. The case study, Cradle to Cradle® (McDonough and Braungart 2002)—Parquet for Generations (Bauwerk Parkett 2017)—Respect Resources and Preservation for the Future, illustrates a successful lighthouse example from industry.

Keywords

Parquet Cradle to Cradle Sustainable development Living and working environment Circular economy Carbon dioxide 

References

  1. Arkar, C., Domjan, S., & Medved, S. (2018). Lightweight composite timber façade wall with improved thermal response. Sustainable Cities and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauwerk Parkett (2017). Healthy living brochure. Retrieved in Nov 15, 2017 from http://www.bauwerk-parkett.com/de.html.
  3. Braungart, M. (1992). An intelligent product system to replace waste management Braungart, Engelfried. Fresnius Envir Bull, 1, 613–619. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlag. 1018-4619/92/090613-07S1.50-0.20/0.Google Scholar
  4. Cradle to Cradle CertifiedTM Trademark and Cradle to Cradle® C2C® Copyright (2017). Registered trademarks of McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry (MBDC). Cradle to Cradle CertifiedTM is a certification mark licensed exclusively by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute (C2CPII), all rights reserved. Retrieved on Nov 15, 2017 from www.c2ccertified.org.
  5. Dovjak, M., Shukuya, M., & Krainer, A. (2012). Exergy analysis of conventional and low exergy systems for heating and cooling of near zero energy buildings. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 58(7/8), 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. EN 15804 (2012). Sustainability of construction works—Environment product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products, European Standard. European Committee for Standardisation.Google Scholar
  7. Gilbert, N. L., Guay, M., Gauvin, D., Dietz, R. N., Chan, C. C., & Levesque, B. (2008). Air change rate and concentration of formaldehyde in residential indoor air. Atmospheric Environment, 42(10), 2424–2428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilding, P. (2011). The great disruption (p. 16). New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gorman, M. (1998). Transforming nature. Ethics, invention and discovery. ISBN 0-7923-8120-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gustavsson, L., Pingoud, K., Sathre, R. (2006). Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: Comparing concrete- and wood-framed buildings, Springer, Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: Wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives, Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden, Energy Policy.Google Scholar
  11. Hawken, P., Lovins, L. H. (1999). Natural capitalism, creating the next industrial revolution. Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0-316-35316-7.Google Scholar
  12. Heimlich J. E. (2008). Formaldehyde. The invisible environment fact sheet series. Retrieved on Nov 15, 2017 from http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/pdf/0198.pdf.
  13. ISO 14025 (2009). Environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations—Principles and procedures, standard. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organisation.Google Scholar
  14. ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines, standard. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.Google Scholar
  15. ISO 14067 (2013). Carbon footprints of products, standard. Geneva, Switzerland: International Standards Organization.Google Scholar
  16. Jelle, B. P. (2011). Traditional, state-of-the-art and future thermal building insulation materials and solutions—Prosperities, requirements and possibilities. Energy and Building, Elsevier,.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kälin, A. (2017). Interview with Albin Kälin. Oct 10, 2017.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, C. W., Song, J. S., Ahu, Y. S., Park, S. H., Park, J. W., Noh, J. H., et al. (2001). Occupational asthma due to formaldehyde. Yonsei Medical Journal, 42(4), 440–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitek Kuzman, M., Kutnar, A. (2014). Contemporary Slovenian timber architecture for sustainbility, green energy and technology. Switzerland: Springer. ISSN 1865-3529.Google Scholar
  20. Košir, M., Krainer, A., Dovjak, M., Perdan, R., & Kristl, Ž. (2010). Alternative to conventional heating and cooling systems in public buildings. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(9), 575–583.Google Scholar
  21. Kunič, R. (2017). Carbon footprint of thermal insulation materials in building envelopes. Energy Efficiency.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9536-1.
  22. Kutnar, A., Hill, C. (2014). Assessment of carbon footprinting in the wood industry. In: S. S. Muthu (Ed.), Assessment of carbon footprint in different industrial sectors, vol 2 (EcoProduction). Singapore [etc.], pp. 135–172. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lakrafli, H., Tahiri, S., El Houssaini, S., & Bouhria, M. (2017). Effect of thermal insulation using leather and carpentry wastes on thermal comfort and energy consumption in a residential building. Energy Efficiency.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9513-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonough, W. (1993). Essay: A centennial sermon: Design ecology ethics and the making of things.Google Scholar
  25. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to Cradle, remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  26. Paganin, G., Angelotti, A., Ducoli, C., et al. (2017). Energy performance of an exhibition hall in a life cycle perspective: embodied energy, operational energy and retrofit strategies. Energy Efficiency, pp 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9521-8.
  27. Pajek, L., & Košir, M. (2017). Can building energy performance be predicted by a bioclimatic potential analysis? Case study of the Alpine-Adriatic region. Energy and Buildings, 139, 160–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. EPEA Switzerland (2017). EPEA Switzerland GmgH. Retrieved on Nov 15, 2017 from www.epeaswitzerland.com.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ansgar Igelbrink
    • 1
  • Albin Kälin
    • 2
    Email author
  • Marko Krajner
    • 2
    • 3
  • Roman Kunič
    • 2
  1. 1.Bauwerk Parkett AGSt. MargrethenSwitzerland
  2. 2.EPEA Switzerland GmbHBaechSwitzerland
  3. 3.Faculty of Civil and Geodetic EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations