Skip to main content
  • 1050 Accesses

Abstract

If manufacturing matters—and if industrial policy can help develop manufacturing—that is because it creates high value added. Value added is a very popular concept in daily political and economic discussion. One hears it in the television debates and reads it in the newspaper articles; everybody wants higher value added, but few apparently are aware of what value added means technically and how it relates to the GDP. It is also a key concept inherent in the discussion in this entire book. So, this chapter digresses into the meaning of the concept and its relationship to the GDP and industrial policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that there are growing criticisms as to whether per GDP is really a perfect measure of economic development. However, with detailed national accounts prepared by statistical agencies in every country, practically it is still the most widely used measure. Per capita income is also used as a headline measure of productivity in a country.

  2. 2.

    Technically adjustments have to made in the calculations to account for the taxes paid to the state.

  3. 3.

    In fact, this expression is in effect a tautology; productivity is calculated by dividing GDP (per capita) by average number of hours worked per worker.

  4. 4.

    Barro (1990).

  5. 5.

    Yülek (1997).

References

  • Ahn, S. (2013). Evolution of industrial policy and green growth in Korea, presentation in future of the world trading system: Asian Perspectives Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. S. (1981). The Korean Miracle (1962–1980) Revisited: Myths and realities in strategy and development, The Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies Working Paper #166, November 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1997). The age of diminished expectations: US economic policy in the 1990s. MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yülek, M. (1997). İçsel büyüme teorileri, gelişmekte olan ülkeler ve kamu politikaları üzerine. Hazine Dergisi, 6 (April 1997), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yülek, M.A. (2018). Value Added and GDP: The Smart Versus the Donkey. In: How Nations Succeed: Manufacturing, Trade, Industrial Policy, and Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0567-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0568-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics