Skip to main content
  • 1087 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses questions such as why industrial policy is needed (especially in developing countries)? What kinds of policy are needed at what stage along the industrialization process? What are the criteria in selecting the appropriate industrial policy? It also discusses the sequencing between industrial policy on the one hand and science, technology, and innovation (STI) policies on the other. Should they be used concurrently? Can STI policies be effective in a less industrialized country? Finally, the chapter presents a methodology for strategic sectors to be selected by policy makers from an industrial policy perspective. This is done for the first time globally. Do all manufacturing subsectors have the same developmental impact? Or, are some subsectors different from others? If so, how can these strategic sectors be identified?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mosconi (2006, 2015a, b).

  2. 2.

    Lucas (1993).

  3. 3.

    Pritchett (2000).

  4. 4.

    Aiyar et al. (2013).

  5. 5.

    Yeldan et al. (2012).

  6. 6.

    Eichengreen et al. (2012, 2013), Aiyar et al. (2013).

  7. 7.

    Yilmaz and Saracoglu (2016), Lee and Narjoko (2015).

  8. 8.

    Such as Amsden (1992), Johnson (1982), Westphal (1990).

  9. 9.

    Weiss (2015).

  10. 10.

    Various studies have examined the de-industrialization process such as Nickell et al. (2008), Lawrence and Edwards (2013), and Peneder and Streicher (2018). Dasgupta and Singh (2006) minted the term premature de-industrialization and Rodrik (2015) discussed it further.

  11. 11.

    Papanek (1962).

  12. 12.

    It can be said that there is one main line of criticism against the sectoral industrial policies: How can the government ‘select a sector’ better than the firms? Then, this line of criticism sets out to argue that general inefficiencies and failures of government action would extend to industrial policy.

  13. 13.

    Over time, the ‘strategic’ sectors also changed. For example, textiles, which was a targeted sector in Japan in late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, lost its importance and share in GDP and exports against steel, automobiles, electronics, and so on.

  14. 14.

    Libicki (1989).

  15. 15.

    D’Hernoncourt et al. (2011).

  16. 16.

    Yülek (2016).

  17. 17.

    Yülek and Taylor (2012).

  18. 18.

    Yülek and Tiryakioğlu (2014).

  19. 19.

    Watermeyer (2012).

  20. 20.

    Yülek and Tiryakioğlu (2014).

  21. 21.

    Haines (2012).

  22. 22.

    Yülek and Taylor (2012), Yülek and Tiryakioğlu (2014), Haines (2012).

  23. 23.

    Yülek and Tiryakioğlu (2014).

References

  • Aiyar, M. S., Duval, M. R. A., Puy, M. D., Wu, M. Y., & Zhang, M. L. (2013). Growth slowdowns and the middle-income trap (No. 13–71). International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. (1992). Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, S., & Singh, A. (2006). Manufacturing, services and premature deindustrialization in developing countries: A Kaldorian analysis (No. 2006/49). Research Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Hernoncourt, J., Cordier, M., & Hadley, D. (2011). Input-output multipliers specification sheet and supporting material. Spicoza Project Report, CEESE, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B., Park, D., & Shin, K. (2012). When fast-growing economies slow down: International evidence and implications for China. Asian Economic Papers, 11(1), 42–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B., Park, D., & Shin, K. (2013). Growth slowdowns redux: New evidence on the middle-income trap (No. w18673). National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, R. (2012). “The complexities of development: The South African national industrial participation programme in perspective”, in Yulek, M. & Taylor, T. (eds.) Designing public procurement policy in developing countries, New York: Springer, pp. 111–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Pritchett, L., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Growth accelerations. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(4), 303–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istanbul Chamber of Industry. (2015a). The largest 500 industrial companies study, Istanbul: Istanbul Chamber of Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istanbul Chamber of Industry. (2015b). The second largest 500 industrial companies study, Istanbul: Istanbul Chamber of Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy: 1925–1975. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom: An inaugural lecture. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1967). Strategic factors in economic development. Ithaca: State School of New York for Industrial and Labor Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. Z., & Edwards, L. (2013). US employment deindustrialization: Insights from history and the international experience. Policy Brief, (13–27).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Narjoko, D. (2015). Escaping the middle-income trap in Southeast Asia: Micro evidence on innovation, productivity, and globalization. Asian Economic Policy Review, 10(1), 124–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libicki, M. C. (1989). What makes industries strategic: A perspective on technology, economic development, and defense. Washington, DC: Institute for Strategic Studies. National Defense University, 1989, 89p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas Jr, R. E. (1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi, F. (2006). The age of “European Champions”: A new chance for EU industrial policy. The European Union Review, 11(1), 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi, F. (2015a). The new European industrial policy: Global competitiveness and the manufacturing renaissance. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi, F. (2015b). “The new industrial policy in Europe a decade after (2002–2012)”, in Economic planning and industrial policy in the globalizing economy, Cham: Springer, pp. 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S., Redding, S., & Swaffield, J. (2008). The uneven pace of deindustrialisation in the OECD. The World Economy, 31(9), 1154–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanek, G. F. (1962). The development of entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peneder, M., & Streicher, G. (2018). De-industrialization and comparative advantage in the global value chain. Economic Systems Research, 30(1), 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L. (2000). Understanding patterns of economic growth: Searching for hills among plateaus, mountains, and plains. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(2), 221–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2015). “Back to fundamentals in emerging markets,” Project Syndicate, 13, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, R. (2012). “Linking developmental deliverables to public sector contracts,” in Designing Public Procurement Policy in Developing Countries, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, John. (2015). Industrial policy in high-income economies. E15Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum. www.e15initiative.org/

  • Westphal, L. E. (1990). Industrial policy in an export-propelled economy: Lessons from South Korea’s experience. Journal of Economic perspectives, 4(3), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeldan, E., Taşçı, K., Voyvoda, E., & Özsan, M. E. (2012). Orta Gelir Tuzağından Çıkış: Hangi Türkiye. İstanbul: TÜRKONFED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, G., & Saracoglu, D. S. (2016). Technological change, human capital, and absorptive capacity: Can Turkey escape the middle income trap? METU Studies in Development, 43(1), 391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yülek, M., & Taylor, T. K. (Eds.). (2012). Designing public procurement policy in developing countries: How to foster technology transfer and industrialization in the global economy. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yülek, M. A. (2016). On the middle income trap, the industrialization process and appropriate industrial policy. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-016-0237-9), 1–24.

  • Yülek, M. A., & Tiryakioğlu, M. (2014). Development-based public procurement policies: A Selective survey of policy experience, supplement to the 2013 Annual Statistical Report on United Nations Procurement: Procurement for Innovation, Copenhagen: UNOPS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yülek, M.A. (2018). The ‘How ’ of Manufacturing: Industrial Policy. In: How Nations Succeed: Manufacturing, Trade, Industrial Policy, and Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0567-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0568-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics