Skip to main content

Midline Block (Central Shielding)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brachytherapy
  • 832 Accesses

Abstract

In radiotherapy for cervical cancer, because brachytherapy can provide concentrated dose to the primary tumor, midline block (central shielding) has been applied at least partially in external beam therapy to lower the dose to rectum and bladder and avoid severe complications. Although this practice has been decreased over the years globally, the central shielding technique continues to be used as standard in Japan. The use of central shielding in Japan has resulted in relatively low incidence of late complications in the rectum and bladder without compromising the disease control. Recent study of composite dose distributions of the treatment regimen using central shielding revealed its characteristics which explains the benefit of this technique. This chapter will cover the history, philosophy, analysis of composite dose distributions, issues of dose reporting, and the future prospect of this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tod M, Meredith W. A dosage system for use in the treatment of cancer of the uterine cervix. Brit J Radiol. 1938;11:809–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fletcher GH. Roentgen treatment of cancer of the cervix. Radiology. 1950;54(6):832–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez C, Kavanagh B. Uterine cervix. In: Halperin E, Perez C, Brady L, editors. Principles and practice of radiation oncology. 5th ed. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1532–609.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wolfson AH, Abdel-Wahab M, Markoe AM, Raub WJ Jr, Diaz D, Desmond JJ, et al. A quantitative assessment of standard vs. customized midline shield construction for invasive cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37(1):237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Viswanathan AN, Beriwal S, De Los Santos JF, Demanes DJ, Gaffney D, Hansen J, et al. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: High-dose-rate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012;11(1):47–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J, Grigsby PW, Levenback C, Stevens RE, et al. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1137–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitney CW, Sause W, Bundy BN, Malfetano JH, Hannigan EV, Fowler WC Jr, et al. Randomized comparison of fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus hydroxyurea as an adjunct to radiation therapy in stage IIB-IVA carcinoma of the cervix with negative para-aortic lymph nodes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group and Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(5):1339–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA, et al. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(15):1144–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearcey R, Brundage M, Drouin P, Jeffrey J, Johnston D, Lukka H, et al. Phase III trial comparing radical radiotherapy with and without cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(4):966–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Potter R, Knocke TH, Fellner C, Baldass M, Reinthaller A, Kucera H. Definitive radiotherapy based on HDR brachytherapy with iridium 192 in uterine cervix carcinoma: report on the Vienna University Hospital findings (1993–1997) compared to the preceding period in the context of ICRU 38 recommendations. Cancer Radiother. 2000;4(2):159–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Potter R, Georg P, Dimopoulos JC, Grimm M, Berger D, Nesvacil N, et al. Clinical outcome of protocol based image (MRI) guided adaptive brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100(1):116–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mazeron R, Fokdal LU, Kirchheiner K, Georg P, Jastaniyah N, Segedin B, et al. Dose-volume effect relationships for late rectal morbidity in patients treated with chemoradiation and MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: results from the prospective multicenter EMBRACE study. Radiother Oncol. 2016;120(3):412–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Report 89. Journal of the ICRU. 2013;13(1–2):Np.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tazaki E. Historical development of radiotherapy for the uterine cervical cancer in Japan. J Jpn Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 1999;11:157–73.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arai T, Akanuma A, Ikeda M, Inoue T, Kasamatsu T, Kubo H, et al. Standardized radiation treatment method for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Jpn J Cancer Clin. 1984;30(5):496–500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shigematsu Y, Nishiyama K, Masaki N, Inoue T, Miyata Y, Ikeda H, et al. Treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix by remotely controlled afterloading intracavitary radiotherapy with high-dose rate: a comparative study with a low-dose rate system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983;9(3):351–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okawa T, Kita M, Goto M, Tazaki E. Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: review of experience at Tokyo Women’s Medical College (1969–1983). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13(12):1845–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Teshima T, Chatani M, Hata K, Inoue T. High-dose rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: I. General figures of survival and complication. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987;13(7):1035–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akine Y, Arimoto H, Ogino T, Kajiura Y, Tsukiyama I, Egawa S, et al. Carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated by irradiation alone. Results of treatment at the National Cancer Center, Tokyo. Acta Oncol. 1990;29(6):747–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arai T, Nakano T, Morita S, Sakashita K, Nakamura YK, Fukuhisa K. High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20-year experience. Cancer. 1992;69(1):175–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ito H, Kutuki S, Nishiguchi I, Shigematsu N, Kuribayashi T, Uematsu M, et al. Radiotherapy for cervical cancer with high-dose rate brachytherapy correlation between tumor size, dose and failure. Radiother Oncol. 1994;31(3):240–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mitsuhashi N, Takahashi M, Nozaki M, Yamakawa M, Takahashi T, Sakurai H, et al. Evaluation of external beam therapy and three brachytherapy fractions for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29(5):975–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogino I, Kitamura T, Okamoto N, Yamasita K, Aikawa Y, Okajima H, et al. Late rectal complication following high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer of the cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31(4):725–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Uno T, Itami J, Aruga M, Kotaka K, Fujimoto H, Sato T, et al. High dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: risk factors for late rectal complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;40(3):615–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hareyama M, Sakata K, Oouchi A, Nagakura H, Shido M, Someya M, et al. High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate intracavitary therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a randomized trial. Cancer. 2002;94(1):117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Toita T, Kakinohana Y, Ogawa K, Adachi G, Moromizato H, Nagai Y, et al. Combination external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: analysis of dose and fractionation schedule. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(5):1344–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakano T, Kato S, Ohno T, Tsujii H, Sato S, Fukuhisa K, et al. Long-term results of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 2005;103(1):92–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Toita T, Kato S, Niibe Y, Ohno T, Kazumoto T, Kodaira T, et al. Prospective multi-institutional study of definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in patients with nonbulky (<4-cm) stage I and II uterine cervical cancer (JAROG0401/JROSG04-2). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82(1):e49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Toita T, Kitagawa R, Hamano T, Umayahara K, Hirashima Y, Aoki Y, et al. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: efficacy and toxicity of a low cumulative radiation dose schedule. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(2):211–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ariga T, Toita T, Kato S, Kazumoto T, Kubozono M, Tokumaru S, et al. Treatment outcomes of patients with FIGO Stage I/II uterine cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: a multi-institutional retrospective research study. J Radiat Res. 2015;56(5):841–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohno T, Noda SE, Okonogi N, Murata K, Shibuya K, Kiyohara H, et al. In-room computed tomography-based brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: results of a 5-year retrospective study. J Radiat Res. 2017;58(4):543–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Macdonald DM, Lin LL, Biehl K, Mutic S, Nantz R, Grigsby PW. Combined intensity-modulated radiation therapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71(2):618–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fenkell L, Assenholt M, Nielsen SK, Haie-Meder C, Potter R, Lindegaard J, et al. Parametrial boost using midline shielding results in an unpredictable dose to tumor and organs at risk in combined external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(5):1572–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perez CA, Breaux S, Madoc-Jones H, Camel HM, Purdy J, Sharma S, et al. Correlation between radiation dose and tumor recurrence and complications in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: stages I and IIA. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(3):373–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Potter R, Haie-Meder C, Van Limbergen E, Barillot I, De Brabandere M, Dimopoulos J, et al. Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology. Radiother Oncol. 2006;78(1):67–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tamaki T, Ohno T, Noda SE, Kato S, Nakano T. Filling the gap in central shielding: three-dimensional analysis of the EQD2 dose in radiotherapy for cervical cancer with the central shielding technique. J Radiat Res. 2015;56(5):804–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tamaki T, Noda SE, Ohno T, Kumazaki Y, Kato S, Nakano T. Dose-volume histogram analysis of composite EQD2 dose distributions using the central shielding technique in cervical cancer radiotherapy. Brachytherapy. 2016;15(5):598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kato S, Ohno T, Thephamongkhol K, Chansilpa Y, Yuxing Y, Devi CR, et al. Multi-institutional phase II clinical study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in East and Southeast Asia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(3):751–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoaki Tamaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tamaki, T. (2019). Midline Block (Central Shielding). In: Yoshioka, Y., Itami, J., Oguchi, M., Nakano, T. (eds) Brachytherapy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0490-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0490-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0489-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0490-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics