Skip to main content

Historical Analysis on Product Form Structure Establishment in Malaysian Industrial Design Practices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 459 Accesses

Abstract

This paper looks at establishing a research framework for National Design Heritage by looking at the form characteristic of modern Malaysian artefacts. Since the establishment of formal modern design education in Malaysia, there have been numerous attempts to understand the Design DNA that can be representative of Malaysian products or Malaysian Design Heritage. However, unlike other studies, Malaysian Design Heritage has not been explored from a historical perspective. This is also because formal modern design and design education only began in Malaysia in 1967, to reach its fiftieth year in 2017. These studies nonetheless, has set precedents towards building a framework for a National Design Heritage from a historical perspective, providing a platform for future product branding and aligning national level design activities. Following that, the paper hopes (1) to propose that formally archived artefact in Malaysia is an adequate comprehension of the nation’s design activities, (2) to identify visual form characteristics attributable to the design identity of modern Malaysian artefacts, based on form, content and context analysis and finally (3) to identify the scope of Industrial Design activities in Malaysia since its introduction in 1967.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidin, S. Z., Sigurjónsson, J., Liem, A., & Keitsch, M. (2008). On the role of formgiving in design. In Proceedings of E&PDE 08, 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education—New Perspective in Design Education, Barcelona, DS46-1, pp. 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abidin, S. Z., Othman, A., Shamsuddin, Z., Samsudin, Z., Hassan, H., & Mohamed, W. A. W. (2015). Malaysian product design identity: issues, transformation and challenges. In Proceedings of 2nd International Colloquium of Art & Design Education Research (iCADER15), Langkawi, pp. 305–318.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM: A design research methodology. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brink, H. I. L. (1993). Validity and reliability in qualitative research. Curationis, 16(2), 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S. (2002). From cultural to creative industries: theory, industry and policy implications. Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, 102(1), 54–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Communication and the Arts. (2011). Industries, a Strategy for 21st Century Australia. Retrieved March 10, 2016 from http://arts.gov.au/creativeCreative.

  • Flew, T. (2011). The creative industries: Culture and policy. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayling, C., & Craftsmanship, O. (2011). Towards a new bauhaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. W., & Bouzalas, E. (Eds.). (2001). Industrial design rights: An international perspective. Kluwer Law International and International Bar Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort af Ornäs, V. (2010). The significance of things: Affective user-artefact relations. Chalmers University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth, I. (2007). Comparison of three methodological approaches of design research. In International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’07, pp 28–31, August 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1963). The Philosophy of David Hume. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1964). Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Norman Kemp Smith (called Critique). New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965. References are to the A and B German editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (1999). Research methodology. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, F., Servieres, M., Lefevre, D., & Kerouanton, J. L. (2011, October). Where virtual enhances physical mock-up: A way to understand our heritage. In Mixed and Augmented Reality-Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH), 2011 IEEE International Symposium On, pp. 1–6, IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, F., Bernard, A., & Hervy, B. (2015). DHRM: A new model for PLM dedicated to product design heritage. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 64(1), 161–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liem, A. (2014). Toward prospective reasoning in design: An essay on relationships among designers’ reasoning, business strategies, and innovation. Le Travail Humain, 77(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutters, E., van Houten, F. J., Bernard, A., Mermoz, E., & Schutte, C. S. (2014). Tools and techniques for product design. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 63(2), 607–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. M., & Brean, D. H. (2010). Overcoming the impossible issue of nonobviousness in design patents. Ky. LJ, 99, 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saidman, P. J. (2007). Crisis in the law of designs. J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y, 89, 301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setliff, E. (2006). Copyright and industrial design: An alternative design alternative. Colum. JL & Arts, 30, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, T., & Iacobucci, D. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of services marketing and management. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Z., & Pankowski, M. (2007). Knowledge reengineering for reverse engineering purposes. In The future of product development (pp. 421–430). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Intellectual Property Organization Resources (n.d.). Locarno Classification. Retrieved March 14, 2016, from http://www.wipo.int/classifications/nivilo/locarno/index.htm?lang=EN.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was made possible through the management system and LESTARI grant awarded by Research Management Institute of UiTM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natrina M. P. Toyong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Toyong, N.M.P., Abidin, S.Z., Mokhtar, S., Hamid, L.A. (2018). Historical Analysis on Product Form Structure Establishment in Malaysian Industrial Design Practices. In: Anwar, R., Mahamood, M., Md. Zain, D., Abd Aziz, M., Hassan, O., Abidin, S. (eds) Proceedings of the Art and Design International Conference (AnDIC 2016). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0487-3_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics