Skip to main content

Developing an e-Learning Module to Prepare Students for Service-Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 607 Accesses

Part of the book series: Quality of Life in Asia ((QLAS,volume 12))

Abstract

Research has shown that students’ learning from service-learning (SL) is strongly affected by how well they have been prepared for the experience . In this chapter, we explain how we addressed this issue through the development of an e-learning module on SL for students and evaluated its usefulness in helping students. Data was collected from 9147 students via an online post-experience survey. Results show that most students found the module quite effective in equipping them with the necessary knowledge, skills and attitude for conducting conduct meaningful services for the community , and learn the most from the experience. An analysis of students’ scores in the end-of-module test also reveals that most students were able to master the content of the module and pass the test. We also reflect on our experience of implementing the module and identify a number of issues that need to be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Astin, A. W., Vogelgesang, L. J., Ikeda, E. K., & Yee, J. A. (2000). How service learning affects students. Los Angeles: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averett, P. E., & Arnd-Caddigan, M. (2014). Preparing BSW students for service-learning: Enhancing epistemological reflection. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 34(3), 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. S., & Federman, J. E. (2013). E-learning in postsecondary education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., et al. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishel, J. (2013). The state of e-learning in higher education: An eye toward growth and increaed access (Research report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Retrieved from https://www.educause.edu/ecar.

  • Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1999). Reflection in service learning: Making meaning of experience. Educaional Horizons, 77, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., & Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. Journal of Experiential Education, 34(2), 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6), 920–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eby, J. (1998). Why service-learning is bad. Service Learning, General, 27. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/27/.

  • Eyler, J. (2005). Academic service-learning for effective civic engagement. Diversity Digest, 9, 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, J. R., & Worrall, L. (2000). Assessments by community agencies: How ‘the other side’ sees service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7(1), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. Service Learning, General, 128. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slceslgen/128.

  • Jacoby, B. (1996). Service-learning in higher education: Concepts and practices. The Jossey-Bass higher and adult education series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. R., Segar, T. C., & Gasiorski, A. L. (2008). “A double-edged sword”: College student perceptions of required high school service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 15(1), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2007). A theory-based approah for designing distributed learning systems. In S. M. Fiore & E. Salas (Eds.), Toward a science of distributed learning (pp. 15–39). Washington: APA.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, H. Y., Lau, C. K., Cheung, E., Chan, S. C., Ngai, G., & Kwan, K. P. (2016). Qualitative analysis of students’ expeience and outcomes of service-learning at PolyU. Unpublished manuscript. Hong Kong: Office of Service-learning, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijen, Ä., Lam, I., Wildschut, L., & Simons, P. R. (2009). Difficulties teachers report about students' reflection; Lessons learned from dance education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, S. (1999). Service learning in alternative education settings. The Clearing House, 73(2), 114–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. J. (n.d.). Preparing students for service learning and civic efficacy projects. Council of Michigan Foundations, Learning to Give.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, J. M., Markey, V., & Allen, M. (2007). Evaluating cognitive outcomes of service learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports, 24(2), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Educational technology research past and present: Balancing rigor and relevance to impact school learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Practice and direction (pp. 13–45). Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. L. (2012). Does service-learning increase student learning: A meta-analysis. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 18(2), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorio, P. L., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene L. P. Cheung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheung, E.L.P., Kwan, Kp. (2019). Developing an e-Learning Module to Prepare Students for Service-Learning. In: T. L. Shek, D., Ngai, G., C. F. Chan, S. (eds) Service-Learning for Youth Leadership. Quality of Life in Asia, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0448-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0448-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0447-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0448-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics