Interaction of a Flexible Splitter Plate with Vortex Shedding Past a Rigid Circular Cylinder

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 12)


This study deals with energy harvesting from vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of a flexible cantilever plate placed in the wake of a rigid cylinder. Conventionally, the plate is designed to resonate with the vortex shedding frequency behind the cylinder at a given flow velocity. The experimental results presented here show that the frequency of the plate oscillations undergoes an abrupt increase from a low value to a higher value at a critical flow velocity. Numerical simulations carried out in the present study suggest that this jump is due to the transition between two modes of wake oscillations in the system, one with a low Strouhal number range accompanied by impeded shedding and the other being the natural vortex shedding with a higher Strouhal number range. It is also found that the mode of vortex shedding depends on the flow velocity as well as the gap between the cylinder and the plate. There exists a critical gap for every flow velocity below which vortex shedding is inhibited resulting in reduced plate vibrations. The results indicate that the position of the plate in the wake affects the shedding frequency significantly and thus the gap between the plate and cylinder needs to be considered as a key parameter in design of such flow-induced energy harvesters.


Energy harvesting Vortex shedding Wake Flexible plate 


  1. 1.
    Allen JJ, Smits AJ (2001) Energy harvesting eel. J Fluids Struct 15(3):629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang DA, Chiu CY, Pham HT (2012) Electromagnetic energy harvesting from vibrations induced by Kármán vortex street. Mechatronics 22(6):746–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akaydin HD, Elvin N, Andreopoulos Y (2010) Energy harvesting from highly unsteady flows using piezo-electric materials. J Intell Mater Struct 21(13):1263–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akaydin HD, Elvin N, Andreopoulos Y (2012) The performance of a self excited fluidic energy harvester. Smart Mater Struct 21(2):025007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerrard JH (1966) The mechanics of the formation region of vortices behind bluff bodies. J Fluid Mech 25(02):401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozono S (1999) Flow control of vortex shedding by a short splitter plate asymmetrically arranged downstream of a cylinder. Phys Fluids 11:2928–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lau YL, So RMC, Leung RCK (2004) Flow-induced vibration of elastic slender structures in a cylinder wake. J Fluids Struct 19(8):1061–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferziger J, Peric M (2002) Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tukovic Z, Cardiff P, Karac A, Jasak H, Ivankovic A (2014) OpenFOAM library for fluid structure interaction. In: 9th OpenFOAM workshop, Zagreb, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michler C, Hulshoff SJ, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2004) A monolithic approach to fluid-structure interaction. Comput Fluids 33(5):839–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Degroote J, Haelterman R, Annerel S, Bruggeman P, Vierendeels J (2010) Performance of partitioned procedures in fluid-structure interaction. Comput Struct 88(7):446–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roshko A (1954) On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies. National Aeronautical and Space Administration (No. TN3169)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations