Skip to main content

Human Rights and Climate Finance—How Does the Normative Framework Affect Taiwan?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1149 Accesses

Part of the book series: Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific ((ELIAP))

Abstract

According to a study on the relationship between climate change and human rights conducted by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in 2009, the effect of climate change might affect certain specific human rights, such as the right to life, the right to adequate food, the right to water, the right to health, the right to adequate housing, and the right to self-determination. The effects of climate change might also affect specific groups, in particular women, children, and indigenous peoples. This study, however, points out that it might be difficult for an individual to hold a particular state responsible for harm caused by climate change. Human rights law provides more effective protection with regard to the measures taken by states to address climate change and their impact on human rights, such as access to information and participation in decision-making. The OHCHR made a submission to the 21st Conference of Parties of the UNFCCC in 2015 entitled: “Understanding Human Rights and Climate Change.” The submission presents ten key messages on human rights and climate change, one of which is “to mobilize maximum available resources for sustainable, human rights-based development.” This key message is crucial as the financial demands of climate change mitigation and adaptation have been increasing rapidly with the rise of the environmental, social and economic costs of global warming and their associated environmental catastrophes on an unprecedented scale. A human rights-based approach to climate finance can help ensure that climate-financed activities comply with existing human rights obligations and principles. It also requires the establishment of institutional safeguard systems that prevent social and environmental harm and maximize participation, transparency, accountability, and equity and rights protections. Guiding principles such as consistency with international human rights obligations, doing no harm, transparency and accountability, public participation in decision-making, and equity and non-discrimination have been proposed to guide the development and implementation of climate finance policies and activities. This chapter focuses on human rights and climate finance, and how this emerging normative framework will affect or has affected Taiwan’s climate finance both in terms of Taiwan’s national climate finance and in terms of Taiwan’s foreign aid policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Relationship Between Climate Change and Human Rights, pp. 8–18, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61 (15 Jan 2009) [hereinafter 2009 OHCHR report].

  2. 2.

    Id., at p. 24.

  3. 3.

    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2015) [hereinafter 2015 OHCHR submission].

  4. 4.

    Id., at p. 3.

  5. 5.

    Johl and Lador (2012), at pp. 4–6.

  6. 6.

    United Nations Environment Programme (2015), at p. 12.

  7. 7.

    Id., at p. 1.

  8. 8.

    Id., at p. 1.

  9. 9.

    Id., at p. 3.

  10. 10.

    Id., at p. 13.

  11. 11.

    2009 OHCHR Report.

  12. 12.

    United Nations Environment Programme (2015), at p. 14.

  13. 13.

    2015 OHCHR Submission, at p. 6.

  14. 14.

    UNFCCC Conference of the Parties, Decision 1/CP.16: The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention, UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1 (15 March 2011). See also the Cancun Agreements. http://unfccc.int/cancun/. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.

  15. 15.

    Id.

  16. 16.

    Human Rights Council Res. 18/22, Human rights and climate change, UN Doc. A/HRC/Res/18/22 (17 Oct 2011); Human Rights Council Res. 26/27, Human rights and climate change, UN Doc. A/HR/Res/26/27 (15 July 2014).

  17. 17.

    Mayer (2016), at pp. 111–112.

  18. 18.

    Id., at pp. 115–117.

  19. 19.

    The concept of “mainstreaming” is a “paradigm that seeks to understand the interrelationships between diverse societal strata, such as the arts, business, education, environment, faith, finance, government, labour, gender, media, public safety, public health and science.” Olawuyi (2016), at p. 144.

  20. 20.

    Id., at p. 145.

  21. 21.

    Id., at p. 149.

  22. 22.

    2015 OHCHR Submission, at p. 9.

  23. 23.

    Id.

  24. 24.

    Id., at p. 3.

  25. 25.

    Full text available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf.

  26. 26.

    2015 OHCHR Submission, at p. 4.

  27. 27.

    UNFCCC Standing Committee on Finance (2014), at p. 5.

  28. 28.

    Ryan et al. (2012), at p. 10.

  29. 29.

    Schalatek (2010), at p. 8.

  30. 30.

    Jodoin (2010), at p. 4.

  31. 31.

    2009 OHCHR Report, at para 70.

  32. 32.

    Jodoin (2010), at pp. 4–5.

  33. 33.

    Columbia Law School Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, Re: Comments on the rules, modalities, and procedures for the SDM, at 1–2 (5 Oct 2016).

  34. 34.

    Olawuyi (2016), at pp. 90–138.

  35. 35.

    Id., at p. 14.

  36. 36.

    Johl and Lador (2012), at p. 3.

  37. 37.

    Jodoin (2010), at p. 6.

  38. 38.

    Olawuyi (2016), at p. 185.

  39. 39.

    Id., at pp. 186–187.

  40. 40.

    Id., at pp. 189–190.

  41. 41.

    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2006), at p. 15.

  42. 42.

    Johl and Lador (2012), at pp. 3–4.

  43. 43.

    Id., at pp. 4–6.

  44. 44.

    Schalatek (2010), at pp. 25–28.

  45. 45.

    For climate change financial mechanisms, see Shih (2011).

  46. 46.

    Schalatek (2010), at p. 29.

  47. 47.

    Id., at p. 30.

  48. 48.

    Id., at pp. 31–32.

  49. 49.

    Id., at pp. 33–34.

  50. 50.

    Johl and Lador (2012), at p. 14.

  51. 51.

    Columbia Law School Sabin Center for Climate Change Law (2016), at p. 3.

  52. 52.

    GEF policies on environmental and social safeguards and gender mainstreaming, GEF/C.40/10/Rev.1 (26 May 2011).

  53. 53.

    Adaptation Fund Board, Environmental and Social Policy (Approved in Nov 2013; Revised in March 2016).

  54. 54.

    Id., at para. 15.

  55. 55.

    Green Climate Fund, Decisions of the Board—Green Climate Fund, Annex III, GCF/B.07/11 (19 June 2014).

  56. 56.

    Columbia Law School Sabin Center for Climate Change Law (2016), at p. 6.

  57. 57.

    For the GCF’s independent redress mechanism, see https://www.greenclimate.fund/independent-redress-mechanism.

  58. 58.

    Perez et al. (2016), at p. 10.

  59. 59.

    Schalatek (2010), at pp. 34–51.

  60. 60.

     Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.

  61. 61.

    Schalatek (2010), at p. 52.

  62. 62.

    See, for example, Attachment to the First Meeting of the GHG Management Fund Committee of 7 Apr 2017 where specific items for the use of the Fund are listed at 76-81. Available at: https://www.epa.gov.tw/public/Data/741413413071.pdf (in Mandarin).

  63. 63.

    Several countries such as the UK, Germany, Australia, Japan, and Norway have set up bilateral climate change financial mechanisms to support developing countries in carrying out mitigation projects. For a summary of these bilateral climate change financial mechanisms, see http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/listing.

  64. 64.

    Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2009).

  65. 65.

    Id., at p. 51.

  66. 66.

    See the official website of the ICDF at: Environment. http://www.icdf.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=12408&ctNode=29857&mp=2. Accessed 2 Nov 2017.

  67. 67.

    For the project description, see: Lending and Investment. http://www.icdf.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=31234&CtNode=29824&mp=2. Accessed 2 Nov 2017.

  68. 68.

    For the project description, see: Lending and Investment. http://www.icdf.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=24882&CtNode=29824&mp=2. Accessed 2 Nov 2017.

  69. 69.

    The list of issues submitted by the Review Committee for the Second ICESCR Report, as well as the response from the agencies, in charge of the issues can be downloaded from: http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=44633&CtUnit=17115&BaseDSD=7&mp=200. Accessed 26 Dec 2017.

  70. 70.

    Id.

  71. 71.

    Schalatek (2010), at pp. 29–51.

  72. 72.

    See: Agriculture. http://www.icdf.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=12410&ctNode=29859&mp=2. Accessed 4 Nov 2017.

  73. 73.

    The list of issues submitted by the Review Committee for the Second ICESCR Report as well as the response from the agencies, in charge of the issues can be downloaded from: http://www.humanrights.moj.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=44633&CtUnit=17115&BaseDSD=7&mp=200. Accessed 26 Dec 2017.

  74. 74.

    See: Lending and Investment. http://www.icdf.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=6776&CtNode=29824&mp=2. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Chen Shih .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shih, WC. (2019). Human Rights and Climate Finance—How Does the Normative Framework Affect Taiwan?. In: Cohen, J., Alford, W., Lo, Cf. (eds) Taiwan and International Human Rights. Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0350-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0350-0_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0349-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0350-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics