Advertisement

Machine Consciousness: Ethics and Implications

  • Siobhan LyonsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates the notion of ‘machine consciousness’ and the concept of a ‘robot life’. The chapter focuses on current debates surrounding the ‘hard problem of consciousness’, and the potential link between machines and consciousness in science and technology. This chapter also deals with the significant ethical implications of the development of machine life, including the development of autonomous weaponry or ‘killer robots’, as well as the potential loss of an ‘essential’ humanity. Finally, this chapter examines the persistence of the ‘Frankenstein Complex’, before challenging commonplace assumptions about the malevolent potential of a robot species.

Keywords

Machine consciousness Brain Ethics Essentialism Killer robots 

References

  1. Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asaro, Peter. ‘On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making’. International Review of the Red Cross. Vol. 94, No. 886, 2012, pp. 687–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Cohen, Yoseph, and Hanson, David. The Coming Robot Revolution: Expectations and Fears About Emerging Intelligent, Humanlike Machines. New York: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Berry, Christopher J. Human Nature. London: Macmillan, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloomfield, Masse. Mankind in Transition: A View of the Distant Past, the Present and the Far Future. Canoga Park: Masefield Books, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. Bricis, Larissa. ‘A Philosopher Predicts How and When Robots Will Destroy Humanity’. Techly. September 25, 2017. Retrieved October 11, 2017, from https://www.techly.com.au/2017/09/22/philosopher-predicts-robots-will-destroy-humanity/.
  7. Brodbeck, Luzius, Hauser, Simon, and Iida, Fumiya. ‘Morphological Evolution of Physical Robots Through Model-Free Phenotype Development’. PLoS One. Vol. 10, No. 6, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canton, James. Future Smart: Managing the Game-Changing Trends That Will Transform Your World. Boston: Da Capo Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, Roger. ‘“Asimov’s Laws of Robotics: Implications for Information Technology, Part 2.” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers’. Computer. Vol. 27, No. 1, 1994, pp. 57–65.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. What Is Philosophy? London: Verso, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Dennett, Daniel. Consciousness Explained. London: Penguin, 1993.Google Scholar
  12. Eldredge, Niles, and Tattersall, Ian. The Myths of Human Evolution. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  13. Fuentes, Agustín, and Visala, Aku. Conversations on Human Nature. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  14. Ghosh, Amitav. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago and London: The Chicago University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Horowitz, Michael C. ‘The Ethics and Morality of Robotic Warfare: Assessing The Debate Over Autonomous Weapons’. Daedalus. Vol. 145, No. 4, 2016, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
  16. Joy, Bill. ‘Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us’. Wired. April 1, 2000. Retrieved January 25, 2018, from https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/.
  17. Keane, Daniel. ‘Philosopher David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem and the Nature of Reality’. ABC News. July 7, 2017. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-07/david-chalmers-and-the-puzzle-of-consciousness/8679884.
  18. Koch, Christof. ‘When Does Consciousness Arise in Human Babies?’ Scientific American. September 1, 2009. Retrieved October 7, 2017, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-does-consciousness-arise/.
  19. Koch, Christof, and Tononi, Giulio. ‘Can Machines Be Conscious’. IEEE Spectrum. June 1, 2008. Retrieved October 9, 2017, from https://spectrum.ieee.org/biomedical/imaging/can-machines-be-conscious.
  20. Lagercrantz, Hugo, and Changeux, Jean-Pierre. ‘The Emergence of Human Consciousness: From Fetal to Neonatal Life’. Paediatric Research. Vol. 65, 2009, pp. 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCauley, Lee. ‘The Frankenstein Complex and Asimov’s Three Laws’, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2007. Retrieved November 12, 2017, from https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2007/WS-07-07/WS07-07-003.pdf.
  22. Morton, Timothy. Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. London: Verso, 2017.Google Scholar
  23. Regalado, Antonio. ‘What It Will Take for Computers to Be Conscious’. MIT Technology Review. October 2, 2014. Retrieved November 12, 2018, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/531146/what-it-will-take-for-computers-to-be-conscious/.
  24. Reichardt, Jasia. Robots: Fact, Fiction and Prediction. London: Thames and Hudson, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. Searle, John. ‘Consciousness’. Annual Review of Neuroscience. Vol. 23, 2000, pp. 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sloman, Aaron. ‘Why Asimov’s Three Laws of Robotics are Unethical’. 2006. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/research/projects/cogaff/misc/asimov-three-laws.html.
  27. Turkle, Sherry. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. Vyverberg, Henry. Human Nature, Cultural Diversity, and the French Enlightenment. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Website

  1. University of Cambridge. ‘On the Origin of (Robot) Species’, Research, 2015. Retrieved December 13, 2017, from http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/on-the-origin-of-robot-species.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media, Music, Communication and Cultural StudiesMacquarie UniversityNorth RydeAustralia

Personalised recommendations