Hybrid-Bridge-Based DAB Converter with Wide Voltage Conversion Gain

  • Deshang Sha
  • Guo Xu
Part of the CPSS Power Electronics Series book series (CPSS)


This chapter proposes a voltage match (VM) control for hybrid-bridge-based dual active bridge (DAB) converter in wide voltage conversion gain applications. With the addition of an auxiliary half-bridge circuit, the topology becomes an integration of a half-bridge and a full-bridge DAB converter. Unlike other PWM generation method for DAB converters, this converter utilizes four-level voltage at one port of the transformer to obtain matched voltage waveforms within the range of twice the minimum conversion gain. Wide conversion gain, decoupling of the two power control variables, and wide zero-voltage switching (ZVS) ranges can be achieved with the proposed voltage match control. Full load ranges of ZVS for the six main power switches can be achieved, and the two auxiliary switches can also operate in a wide ZVS range. In addition, the power control is done only using two control variables and its implementation is very simple, only needing a divider and a conventional voltage regulator. These characteristics and benefits of the proposed control are verified by experimental results from a 1 kW converter prototype.


Hybrid bridge Dual active bridge Voltage match control Wide ZVS range Wide conversion gain 


  1. 1.
    Choi W, Rho KM, Cho BH (2016) Fundamental duty modulation of dual-active-bridge converter for wide-range operation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(6):4048–4064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhao B, Song Q, Liu W, Liu G, Zhao Y (2015) Universal high-frequency link characterization and practical fundamental-optimal strategy for dual-active-bridge DC–DC converter under PWM plus phase-shift control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30(12):6488–6494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shen Y, Sun X, Li W, Wu X, Wang B (2016) A modified dual active bridge converter with hybrid phase-shift control for wide input voltage range. IEEE Trans Power Electron 31(10):6884–6990Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song W, Lehman B (2004) Dual-bridge DC–DC converter: a new topology characterized with no deadtime operation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 19(1):94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun X, Li X, Shen Y, Wang B, Guo X (2017) A dual-bridge LLC resonant converter with fixed-frequency PWM control for wide input applications. IEEE Trans Power Electron 32(1):69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bezerra PAM, Krismer F, Burkart RM, Kolar JW (2014) Bidirectional isolated non-resonant DAB DC–DC converter for ultra-wide input voltage range applications. In: 2014 International Power Electronics and Application Conference and Exposition (PEAC), pp 1038–1044Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inoue S, Akagi H (2007) A bidirectional DC–DC converter for an energy storage system with galvanic isolation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 22(6):2299–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oggier GG, Garcia GO, Oliva AR (2009) Switching control strategy to minimize dual active bridge converter losses. IEEE Trans Power Electron 24(7):1826–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu K, Silva CW, Dunford WG (2012) Stability analysis of isolated bidirectional dual active full-bridge DC–DC converter with triple phase-shift control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(4):2007–2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain AK, Ayyanar R (2011) PWM control of dual active bridge: comprehensive analysis and experimental verification. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(4):1215–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Power Conversion Center, School of AutomationBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations