Participatory Budgeting and Progressive Cities: Are London and Paris Listening to Their Own Voices?

  • Cécile DoustalyEmail author
Part of the ARI - Springer Asia Series book series (ARI, volume 6)


Cities around the world have taken the process of local politics outside the field of professional expertise and legitimate culture to allow for greater local participation. In the context of increased urban change, funding cuts and administrative reforms but also citizen’s political disaffection, methodologies to engage inhabitants with their neighbourhoods have been developed in France and Britain over the last 15 years. This chapter focuses on one of the most efficient and popular of such schemes worldwide, participatory budgeting, which chimes surprisingly well with New Public Management practices. The untapped field of research enquiry lies in understanding developments in participatory budgeting in London and Paris, with an attention to the wider context and scale (from global to national, city, districts and neighbourhoods levels). Conclusions highlight that participatory budgeting needs clear political insight, willpower, funding and local tailoring to be successfully implemented and questions its capacity to outlive change in political parties and leaders. The chapter then identifies the conditions and variables for such programmes to encourage progressive cities characterized by more conviviality, inclusion, distributive justice and environmental sustainability. The chapter isolates elements of progressivism in PB in London and Paris whose models grew further apart in the period until 2016. While Paris has refined its practice year on, London boroughs community budgets have become scarce, as a result of lack of public funding and democratic empowerment, confirming the view that “economic growth [is] a failing and insufficient criteria to create good governance and liveable cities, as opposed to civic involvement” (Cho and Douglass, Introduction). Participatory budgeting is therefore a flexible instrument which can wave without having left much trace or trigger more wide-ranging improvements and further democratic rights.


  1. Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29–50. Scholar
  2. Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2015). Becoming a best practice, neoliberalism and the curious case of PB. In C. W. Lee, M. McQuarrie, & E. T. Walker (Eds.), Democratizing inequalities: Dilemmas of the new public participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bonnet-Oulaldj N., & Simonnet D. (2014). Comment répondre aux besoins des habitants de Paris et sa petite couronne?, L’Humanité, 19 November.Google Scholar
  4. Buser, M. (2013). Tracing the democratic narrative: Big Society, localism and civic engagement. Local Government Studies, 39(1), 3–21. Scholar
  5. Cabannes, Y. (2004a). Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment & Urbanization. Participatory Governance, 16(1), 27–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabannes, Y., (UN-HABITAT). (2004b). Participatory Budgeting: conceptual framework and analysis of its contribution to urban governance and the Millennium Development Goals. Concept Paper. Working Paper 140.Google Scholar
  7. Cabannes, Y. (2015). The impact of participatory budgeting on basic services: municipal practices and evidence from the field. Environment & Urbanization, 27(1), 257–284. Scholar
  8. Cabannes, Y., & Delgado, C. (Eds.). (2015). Participatory Budgeting, Dossier N° 1, Another city is possible! (Alternatives to the city as a commodity series). Lisbon: (c)Creative Commons.
  9. Cabannes Y., & Lipietz B. (2015). The democratic contributing of participatory budgeting (Working Papers Series 2015, no. 15, Vol. 168, pp. 1–33). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  10. CP (Centre Presse) (2014). Très critique, le budget participatif passe mal, June 17.Google Scholar
  11. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2011). Communities in the driving seat: A study of participatory budgeting in England. (Study produced by SQW, Cambridge Economic Associates, Geoff Fordham Associates).
  12. Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). (2013). Neighbourhood Community Budget Pilot Programme.
  13. Doustaly, C. (2013). Arts council England in the 2000s: Towards digital era governance? In E. Avril & C. Zumello (Eds.), New technology, organizational change and governance (pp. 23–38). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doustaly C. (2015). Archives from: Tower Hamlets, Sutton, Kingston upon Thames, Westminster Councils and Mairie de Paris. Fieldwork: interviews, observation and participant observation in Paris and Greater London.Google Scholar
  15. Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class – Revisited. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Ganuza, E., Nez, H., & Morales, E. (2014). The struggle for a voice: Tensions between associations and citizens in Participatory Budgeting. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2274–2291. Scholar
  17. Ile de France. (2015). Les budgets participatifs lycéens à la loupe. Ile-de-France Regional Council.
  18. Jean, D. (2014). Le budget participatif, nouvelle tendance des villes mondes, Le Monde, July 3.Google Scholar
  19. Jérôme, B. (2014). Anne Hidalgo cajole sa gauche pour asseoir son pouvoir, Le Monde, September 30.Google Scholar
  20. Khan, S. (2016). A Manifesto for all Londoners. Sadiq Khan and London Labour.
  21. Lee, C. W., McQuarrie, M., & Walker, E. T. (Eds.). (2015). Democratizing inequalities: Dilemmas of the new public participation. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lefèvre, C. (2012). La gouvernance du Grand Londres, quelles leçons pour Paris? Les cahiers de la métropole. Ville de Paris: Sciences Po Paris.Google Scholar
  23. Lerner, J. (2014). Everyone counts: could "Participatory Budgeting" change democracy? Ithaca: Cornell University press.Google Scholar
  24. LP (Le Parisien). (2014). Les centristes font la leçon à Anne Hidalgo, September 10.Google Scholar
  25. LP (Le Parisien). (2015). Anne Hidalgo veut créer une carte du citoyen parisien, January 21.Google Scholar
  26. Mairie de Paris (2015). Budget Primitif 2015.
  27. Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19. Scholar
  28. Pati, A. (2011). Is participatory budgeting losing ground? The Guardian, 12 August.
  29. Röcke, A. (2014). Framing citizen’s participation: Participatory budgeting in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scottish Government, 2015, Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015.Google Scholar
  31. Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., Röcke, A., & Allegretti, G. (2012). Transnational models of citizen participation: The case of participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 1–32.Google Scholar
  32. Sintomer, Y., Traub-Merz, R., & Zhang, J. (Eds.). (2013). Participatory budgeting in Asia and Europe, key challenges of participation. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  33. Sintomer Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2016). Participatory budgeting in Europe: Democracy and public governance [translated 2008 edition, La Découverte]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Stoker, G. (2006). Why politics matters: Making democracy work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. Sutton Local Committees, 2013. Report on PB.Google Scholar
  36. Tonkiss, F. (2013). Cities by design, the social life of urban form. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Tower Hamlets council, 2015. PB leaflets.Google Scholar
  38. Véron P. (2015). Why Paris is building the world’s biggest participatory budget? New Cities Foundation.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AGORA Research CentreUniversité Cergy Pontoise Cergy (Greater Paris)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations