Advertisement

The Rise of Progressive Cities East and West

  • Mike DouglassEmail author
  • Romain Garbaye
  • K. C. Ho
Chapter
Part of the ARI - Springer Asia Series book series (ARI, volume 6)

Abstract

The rise of progressive cities is an invitation to understand the conditions that enable progressive modes of participatory governance that expand the right to the city in the pursuit of social justice. The focus on progressive cities is essential as cities are rapidly becoming key sites of policy-making in the contemporary world. In contrast to national levels, governance at city scales can more readily foster democratic and vital day-to-day links between government, civil society, and business interests. We stress the different paths taken toward progressive governance, paths marked by democratizing national politics in East Asia and long-standing local democratic participation in Europe. As the studies show, cities are found to be progressive in different ways, and some are experiencing serious junctures that are impeding the gains they have made. The chapter concludes by showing how the 13 city studies of the book are organized along three themes. Theme 1 incorporates the overviews, conceptualizations, and practices in the making of progressive cities. Theme 2 includes chapters that examine specific urban policies focused on inclusion and distributive justice. The authors of chapters brought together in theme 3 explore the idea of conviviality and the associational life of city residents and nonresidents at community and city scales. Discussions of the urban commons, vernacular heritage, and relations with the natural environment are included to show how motives other than those for material gain also arise from grassroots mobilizations and local governance politics aimed at enhancing of urban lifeworlds. The chapters in this book provide hopeful as well as cautionary tales about struggles for progressive cities. Our intention is not to prove that a given city is progressive in any absolute way. It instead uses the lens of our concept of progressive cities to comparatively assess processes of urban governance in the world today and, in so doing, contribute to shifting the discourse on cities toward ideas of human flourishing.

References

  1. Asia Development Bank (ADB). (2014). Sustainable Urbanization in Asia and Latin America. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, A. (2012). Refugees: Social precarity and soul in 21st century Japan. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(2), 345–370.  https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arcadis. (2017). Sustainable cities index 2017. https://www.arcadis.com/media/0/6/6/%7B06687980-3179-47AD-89FD-F6AFA76EBB73%7DSustainable%20Cities%20Index% 202016%20Global%20Web.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, B. R. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barron, D. (2001). A localist critique of the New Federalism. Duke Law Journal, 51(1), 377–433. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol51/iss1/9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caponio, T., & Bokert, M. (2010). The local dimension of migration policy-making. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloomberg, M., & Pope, C. (2017). Climate of hope – How cities, businesses, and citizens can save the Planet. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2014). Urban worlds – the “Urban Age” in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 731–755.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butcher, M., & Velayutham, S. (Eds.). (2009). Dissent and cultural resistance in Asia’s cities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27–46.  https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caprotti, F. (2014). Eco-urbanism and the Eco-city, or, denying the Right to the City? Antipode, 46(5), 1285–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city, planning and participation, 1969–1984. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clavel, P. (2010). Activists in City Hall: The progressive response to the Reagan Era in Boston and Chicago. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clavel, P. (2016). What’s the progressive city? http://progressivecities.org/whats-the-progressive-city-3/. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  16. Daniere, A., & Douglass, M. (Eds.). (2008). Building urban communities: The politics of civic space in Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Douglass, M. (2009). Globopolis or cosmopolis? Alternative futures of city life in East Asia. Studies in Urban Humanities, 2, 67–115.Google Scholar
  18. Douglass, M. (2013). Decentralizing governance in a transborder urban age: East Asia and the Busan–Fukuoka “Common living sphere”. Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 731–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Douglass, M. (2016a). ACSP distinguished educator: John Friedmann. Journal of Education and Planning Research, 36(2), 119–120.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16645361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglass, M. (2016b). From good city to progressive city: reclaiming the urban future in Asia. In H. Rangan, M. K. Ng, J. Chase, & L. Porter (Eds.), Insurgencies and Revolutions: Reflections on John Friedmann's contributions to planning theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Douglass, M., Ho, K. C., & Ooi, G. L. (Eds.). (2010). Globalization, the city and the rise of civil society – The social production of civic spaces in Pacific Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Duara, P. (2014). The crisis of global modernity: Asian traditions and a sustainable future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2012). Benchmarking global city competitiveness. London: The Economist.Google Scholar
  24. Fainstein, S. S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05279275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fieldman, G. (2011). Neoliberalism, the production of vulnerability and the hobbled state: Systemic barriers to climate adaptation. Climate and Development, 3(2), 159–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2011.582278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (Eds.). (2008). Community cohesion in crisis? New dimensions of diversity and difference. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Friedmann, J. (2000). The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 460–472.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedmann, J. (2011). Insurgencies: Essays in planning theory. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garbaye, R. (2005). Getting into local power: The politics of ethnic minorities in British and French cities. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gendron, R., & Domhoff, G. W. (2009). The leftmost city: Power and progressive politics in Santa Cruz. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  31. Goldberg, M., 2014. The rise of the progressive city. The Nation. April 2. http://www.thenation.com/article/rise-progressive-city/. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
  32. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.Google Scholar
  33. Imrie, R., & Raco, M. (Eds.). (2003). Urban renaissance? New labour, community and urban policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Katz, B. (2014). Nixon’s New Federalism 45 Years Later, Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2014/08/11/nixons-new-federalism-45-years-later/ . Accessed 28 May 2017.
  35. Keith, M. (2005). After the cosmopolitan? Multicultural cities and the future of racism. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khoo, T. C. (2012). The CLC framework: Urban solutions. Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC), Singapore. http://www.clc.gov.sg/. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  37. Le Galès, P. (2003). Le retour des villes Européennes, societies urbaines, mondialisation, government et gouvernance. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  38. Lees, L. (2014). The death of sustainable communities in London. In R. Imrie & L. Lees (Eds.), Sustainable London? The future of a global city (pp. 149–172). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Lloyd-Jones, T., & Allen, J. (Eds.). (2010). Social sustainability in urban areas: Communities, connectivity and the urban fabric. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyerson, H. (2015). The revolt of the cities, American Prospect. http://prospect.org/article/revolt-cities. Accessed 26 Sept 2015.
  43. Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcout, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  44. Murphy, P., & Hogan, T. (2012). Discordant order: Manila’s neo-patrimonial Urbanism. Thesis Eleven, 112(1), 10–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513612450500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nag, R. M. (2012). Transforming Asia: Realizing the Asian century through good governance. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 1(1), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/227797521200100102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagy, S. R. (2014). Politics of multiculturalism in east Asia: Reinterpreting multiculturalism. Ethnicities, 14(1), 160–176.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813498078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peattie, L. (1998). Conviviality. In M. Douglass & J. Friedmann (Eds.), Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age (pp. 247–253). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Pinson, G. (2009). Gouverner la Ville par Projet: Urbanisme et Gouvernance des Villes Européennes. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
  49. Robertson, D. (2016). Brazil’s critique of the Habitat III “Zero Draft” of The New Urban Agenda. RIOONWATCH. http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=33186. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
  50. Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis—Planning for multicultural cities. London: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  51. Sandercock, L., & Lyssiotis, P. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st century. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  52. Schragger, R. (2013). Is a progressive city possible? Reviving urban liberalism for the twenty-first century. Harvard Law Review, 7, 231–252.Google Scholar
  53. Seixas, J., & Albet, A. (Eds.). (2012). Urban governance in southern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  54. Shukra, K. (1998). The changing pattern of black politics, in Britain. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  55. Soja, E. W. (2011). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  56. Super, D. (2005). Rethinking fiscal federalism. Harvard Law Review, 118(8), 2544–2561.Google Scholar
  57. Tallon, A. (2010). Urban regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Trading Economics. (2017). Japan’s Population. https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/population. Accessed 6 June 2017.
  59. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2016). The state of Asian cities. Bangkok: UNESCAP.Google Scholar
  60. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UNWCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain (Working Paper n° 25 of the Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS)). Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  62. Wong, J. (2004). Democratization and the left: Comparing East Asia and Latin America.Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1213–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yap, O. F. (2013). Economic performance and democratic support in Asia’s emergent democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(4), 486–512.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urban & Regional Planning, University of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3ParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Sociology and Asia Research InstituteNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations