Advertisement

The Idea of ‘Belonging’ and Citizenship Among Refugees: Some Theoretical Considerations

  • Nasreen Chowdhory
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter interrogates the consequences of nation-building projects of Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, especially how state constructed boundaries of belonging and citizenship. Theoretically, the chapter illustrates the claims of asylum states that exclude the rights of non-nationals, especially refugees, and the politics of marginalization within refugees’ countries of origin create the conditions for refugee flow that are later replicated in their countries of asylum. The chapter asserts that the lack of recognition of the asylum state goes a long way towards marginalizing non-citizens on the basis of the politics of belonging, rooted in notions of membership in the nation-state.

Keywords

State Nation-building Belonging Citizenship Refugee repatriation 

References

  1. Aga Khan, S. (1981). Study on human rights and massive exoduses. ECOSOC, Doc. E/CN4/1503. 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. (Ed.). (1996). In search of cool ground: War, flight and homecoming in northeast Africa. London: James Currey Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T., & Morsink, H. (Eds.). (1994). When refugees go home. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, T., & Turton, D. (1996). Introduction: In search of cool ground. In T. Allen (Ed.), Search of cool ground: War, flight and homecoming in Northeast Africa. London: James Curry Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Attiya, H. (1988, April). Interviews in Refugees. (52).Google Scholar
  6. Bascom, J. (1994). The dynamics of refugee repatriation: The case of Eritrean in eastern Sudan. In W. T. Gould & A. M. Findlay (Eds.), Population migration and the changing world Drder (pp. 225–248). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosniak, L. (2000a). Citizenship denationalized (the state of citizenship symposium). Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(2), 447–508.Google Scholar
  9. Bosniak, L. (2000b). Universal citizenship and the problem of alienage. Northwestern University Law Review, 94(3), 963–982.Google Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R. (1998). Ethnic and nationalist violence. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 423–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chimni, B. (2003). Post-conflict peace building and the return of refugees: Concepts, practices and institutions. In N. Edward & J. V. Selm (Eds.), Refugees and forced displacement international security human vulnerability and the state (pp. 195–221). United Nation Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coles, G. (1985). Voluntary repatriation: A background study. Paper prepared for the Round Table on Voluntary Repatriation. International Institute of Humanitarian Law/UNHCR: San Remo, Italy.Google Scholar
  13. Coles, G. (1987). The human rights approach to the solution of the refugee problem: A theoretical and practical enquiry. In A. Nash (Ed.), Human rights and the protection of refugees under international law (pp. 195–222). Montreal: Canadian Human Rights Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Coles, G. (1989). Approaching the refugee problem today. In G. Loescher & L. Monahan (Eds.), Refugees and international relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coles, G. (1992). Appeal to donor governments. Asmara: Commission for Eritrean Refugee Affairs, Provisional Government of Eritrea.Google Scholar
  16. Coles, G. (1992b). Approaches and strategies in the repatriation of Eritrean refugees. Asmara: Provisional Government of Eritrea.Google Scholar
  17. Corrigan, P., & Sayer, D. (1985). The great arch: English state formation as cultural revolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Dahrendorf, R. (1974). Citizenship and beyond: The social dynamics of an idea. Social Research, 41(4), 673–701.Google Scholar
  19. Das, V., & Poole, D. (Eds.). (2004). Anthropology in the margins of the state. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. DaVanzo, J. (1981). Repeat migration, information costs, and location-specific capital. Population and Environment, 4(1), 44–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desbarats, J. (1985). Policy influences on refugee settlement patterns. Kroeber Society Anthropological Papers, 65–66, 49–63.Google Scholar
  22. Dillon, M. (1995). The asylum seeker and the stranger: An other politics, hospitality and justice. Paper presented in International Studies Association Conference, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Dillon, M. (1999). The scandal of the refugee: Some reflections on the ‘Inter’ of international relations and continental thought. In D. Campbell & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), Moral spaces: Rethinking ethics and world politics. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, P., Ruesschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1985). Bringing the state back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goodwin-Gill, G. S. (1996). The refugee in international law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hammer, T. (1986). Citizenship: Membership of a nation and of a state. International Migration, 24, 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammer, T. (1990). International migration, citizenship and democracy. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  28. Hammond, L. (1999). Examining the discourse of repatriation: Towards a more proactive theory of return migration. In R. Black & K. Koser (Eds.), The end of the refugee cycle? Refugee repatriation and reconstruction (pp. 227–244). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  29. Hansen, T. B., & Stepputat, F. (Eds.). (2001). States of imagination: Ethnographic explorations of the postcolonial state. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harrell-Bond, B. (1989). Repatriation: Under what circumstances is it the most desirable solution for refugees? An agenda for research. African Studies Review, 1, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hathaway, J. (1997). The meaning of repatriation. International Journal of Refugee Law, 9(4), 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hathaway, J. (2005). The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Herbst, J. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. In J. L. Synder, M. Trachtenberg, & F. Zakaria (Eds.), International history and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Holloway, D., & Stedman, S. J. (2002). Civil wars and state-building in Africa and Eurasia. In M. R. Beissinger & C. Young (Eds.), Beyond state crisis? Postcolonial Africa and Post-Soviet Eurasia in comparative perspective (pp. 161–189). Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press.Google Scholar
  35. Karadawi, A. (1987). The problem of urban refugees in Sudan. In J. Rogge (Ed.), Refugees: A third world dilemma (pp. 115–129). Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  36. Karadawi, A. (1999). Refugee policy in Sudan 1967–1984. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  37. Kibreab, G. (1987). Refugees and development in Africa: The case of Eritrea. Trenton: The Red Sea Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kibreab, G. (1999). Revisiting the debate on people, place identity and displacement. Journal of Refugee Studies, 12, 384–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kibreab, G. (2003). Citizenship rights and repatriation of refugees. International Migration Review, 37, 24–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Knop, K. (2002). Diversity and self-determination in international law. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kolenic, P. (1974). African refugees: Characteristics and patterns of movement. Ohio: Ohio University.Google Scholar
  42. Krohn-Hansen, C., & Nustad, K. G. (2005). State formation: Anthropological perspective. Ann Arbor: Pluto Express.Google Scholar
  43. Kunz, E. (1973). The refugee in flight: Kinetic models and forms of displacement. International Migration Review, 7, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kunz, E. (1981). Exile and resettlement: Refugee theory. International Migration Review, 15(1), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1994). Return of the citizen: A survey of recent work on citizenship theory. Ethics, 104(2), 352–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Larkin, M. A., Cuny, F., & Stein, S. (Eds.). (1992). Repatriation under conflict in Central America. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Centre for Immigration Policy and Refugee Assistance, 1991.Google Scholar
  47. Malkki, L. (1992). National geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Malkki, L. (1995a). Purity and exile: Violence, memory and national cosmology among Hutu refugees in Tanzania. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Malkki, L. (1995b). Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 495–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mann, M. (1986). The sources of power: A history of power from the beginning to A.D. 1760. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marshall, T. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Midgal, J. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Minogue, K. (1995). Two concepts of citizenship. In A. L. Dragovic (Ed.), Citizenship east and west. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Olwig, K. F. (1998). Contesting homes: Home-making and the making of anthropology. In N. Rapport & A. Dawson (Eds.), Migrants of identity: Perceptions of home in a world in movement (pp. 225–236). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  55. Preston, R. (Ed.). (1993). The integration of returned exiles, former combatants and other war-affected namibians. Windhoek: Namibia Institute for Social and Economic Research.Google Scholar
  56. Ranger, T. (1994). Studying repatriation as a part of African social history. In T. Allen & H. Morsink (Eds.), When refugees go home. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
  57. Rapport, N., & Dawson, A. (1998). Migrants of identity: Perceptions of home in a world of movement. Oxford: Oxford International Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Rogge, J. (1977). A geography of refugees: Some illustrations from Africa. The Professional Geographer, 24(2), 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogge, J. (1985). Too many too long: Sudan’s twenty year refugee dilemma. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
  60. Rogge, J. (1991). Repatriation of refugees: A not-so-simple ‘optimum’ solution. Paper presented at the Symposium on Social and Economic Aspects of Mass Voluntary Return of Refugees From One African Country to Another. Harare, Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
  61. Rogge, J. (1994). Repatriation of refugee: Not so simple ‘optimum solution’. In T. Allen & H. Morsink (Eds.), When refugees go home (pp. 14–49). Trenton: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rogge, J., & Akol, J. (1989). Repatriation: Its role in resolving Africa’s refugee dilemma. International Migration Review, 22(2), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rubenstein, K., & Adler, D. (2000). International citizenship: The future of nationality in a globalised world. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(4), 519–548.Google Scholar
  64. Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control? Sovereingnty in the an age globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sassen, S. (1999). Guest and aliens. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  66. Sassen, S. (2000). Democracy, citizenship and the global city. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Shklar, J. N. (1991). American citizenship: The quest for inclusion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Silverman, M. (1992). Deconstructing the nation: Immigration, racism and citizenship in modern France. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith, A. D. (1983). Theories of nationalism (2nd ed.). Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
  71. Soguk, N. (1999). States and strangers: Refugees and displacements of statecraft. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  72. Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and posnationalist membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Soysal, Y. N. (2000). Citizenship and identity in post war Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stein, B., Cuny, F., & Reed, P. (Eds.). (1995). Refugee repatriation during conflict: A new conventional wisdom. Dallas: The Centre for the Study of Societies in Crisis.Google Scholar
  75. Steinmetz, G. (1999). Introduction: Culture and the state. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), State/culture state formation after the culture turn (pp. 1–51). London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Stepputat, F. (1999). Repatriation and everyday forms of state formation in Guatemala. In R. Black & K. Koser (Eds.), The end of refugee cycle? Refugee repatriation and reconstruction (pp. 210–227). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  77. Tilly, C. (1975). The formation of national states in Western Europe. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Tilly, C. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In Peter Evans et al. (Eds.), In Bringing the State Back (pp. 169–191). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Uddin, N. (2010). Politics of cultural difference: Identity and marginality in the Chittagong hill tracts of Bangladesh. South Asian Survey, 17(2), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. UNHCR. (1996). Handbook: Voluntary repatriation international protection. Geneva.Google Scholar
  81. UNHCR Document. (1993). Protection guidelines on voluntary repatriation.Google Scholar
  82. Walzer, M. (1995). Education, democratic citizenship and multiculturalism. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 29(2), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Warner, D. (1992). We are all refugees. International Journal of Refugee Law, 4(3), 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Warner, D. (1994). Voluntary repatriation and the meaning of return to home: A critique of liberal mathematics. Journal of Refugee Studies, 7, 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Warner, D. (1999). Refugee state and state protection. In F. Nicholson & P. Twomey (Eds.), Refugee rights and realities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Wolff, S. (2001). German expellee organizations between ‘homeland’ and ‘at home’: A case study of the politics of belonging. Refuge, 20, 52–65.Google Scholar
  87. Xenos, N. (1996). Refugees: The modern condition. In M. J. Shapiro & H. R. Alker (Eds.), Challenging boundaries global flows, territorial identities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  88. Zieck, M. (1999). UNHCR and voluntary repatriation of refugees: A legal analysis. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  89. Zieck, M. (2005). Vanishing points of the refugee law regime. Response to James Hathaway. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 20(2), 217–284.Google Scholar
  90. Zolberg, A. R. (2000). The dawn of cosmopolitan denizenship. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(2), 511–518.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations