Advertisement

Life Cycle Assessment of Typical Sanitary Ceramic Products in China

  • Yanjing Wang
  • Yu Liu
  • Xianzheng Gong
  • Zhihong Wang
  • Feng Gao
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

The ceramic sector contributes significantly to the consumption of resources and energy, as well as the impact to the natural environment in China. In this study, the environmental impact of sanitary ceramic products was quantified and analyzed using life cycle assessment methodology with a “cradle to gate” perspective. The results showed that fossil depletion (FDP) were the most serious environmental impacts which account for the total damage (62.02%), followed by global warming potential (GWP) (28.75%) and particulate matter formation (PMFP) (8.12%). In addition, the energy production phase was the stage that resulted to the major environment load due to natural gas production and power generation. The natural gas and coal consumption, as well as CO2 emissions represented significant contribution to the total impact which account for 37.06, 18.92 and 28.44%, respectively. Moreover, it was indicated that the sensitivity of natural gas and electricity consumption to sanitary ceramics were greater than other substances. Therefore, reducing the consumption of natural gas, electricity and resin are the effective way to achieve energy saving and emission reduction in sanitary ceramic industry.

Keywords

Sanitary ceramics Life cycle analysis Energy saving and emission reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2164056), National Key Research and Development Plan (2016YFF0204403-02). Moreover, this work is financed by Beijing municipal science and technology commission project (D161100002416001), National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFF0201501).

References

  1. 1.
    B. Nie, Three major factors affect the development of China’s construction and sanitary ceramics industry. Ceramics, 9–11 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.D. Bovea, J. Serrano, G.M. Bruscas, A. Gallardo, Application of life cycle assessment to improve the environmental performance of a ceramic tile. Packag. Syst. Packag Technol. Sci. 19, 83–95 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.D. Bovea, U. Saura, J.L. Ferrero, J. Giner, Cradle-to-gate study of red clay for use in the ceramic industry. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 12(6), 439–447 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Ibáñez-Forés, M.-D, Bovea, A. Simó, Life cycle assessment of ceramic tiles. Environmental and statistical analysis. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 16, 916–928 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.L. Giudice, C. Ingrao, M.T. Clasadonte, Life cycle assessment for highlighting environmental hotspots in the Sicilian traditional ceramic sector: the case of ornamental ceramic plates. J. Cleaner Prod. 142, 225–239 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Pini, A.M. Ferrari, R. Gamberini, P. Neri et al., Life cycle assessment of a large, thin ceramic tile with advantageous technological properties. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 19, 1567–1580 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Tang, S. Dai, M. Yang, Application of life cycle assessment in energy saving evaluation of building ceramics. J. Wuhan Univ. 32(4), 149–152 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Xie, H. Wang, Comparative analysis of ceramic wall tiles and ceramic slabs based on life cycle assessment. Chem. Eng. Equip. 5, 208–211 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Xia, J. Zuo, Jingdezhen household China life cycle evaluation (LCA) 31(4), 617–622 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peixi Chen, Environmental impact assessment of sanitary ceramics life cycle. Sci. Technol. Innov. 18, 50–51 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D.R. Gómez (Argentina), J.D. Watterson (UK), IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Ntziachristos, Z. Samaras, EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2016 (European Environment Agency)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eco-invent Database v2.2, Eco-invent center. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories: 2010. http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/. Accessed 24 Sep 14 (2010)
  14. 14.
    Sinocenter, Materials Life Cycle Inventory Database. cnmlca.bjut.edu.cn
  15. 15.
    M.A.J. Huijbregts, Z.J.N. Steinmann, P.M.F. Elshout et al., ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessme at midpoint and endpoint level (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanjing Wang
    • 1
  • Yu Liu
    • 1
  • Xianzheng Gong
    • 1
  • Zhihong Wang
    • 1
  • Feng Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of TechnologyChaoyang District, BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations