Advertisement

Evaluation of Hydro-Mechanical Behaviour of Hydraulic Barriers of Landfill Covers

  • P. V. Divya
  • B. V. S. Viswanadham
  • J. P. Gourc
Conference paper

Abstract

Bentonite amended local soils are used as hydraulic barriers (CB) in municipal solid waste landfills and for the disposal of low level radioactive waste stored containers. Excessive settlements can cause cracks in the CB which affect the strength and provide preferential flow paths to fluids compromising the sealing efficiency of the barrier. Thus, the integrity of CB with respect to their hydraulic conductivity and flexural strength is very important to prevent the environment hazards. In the present study, a series of hydraulic conductivity tests, direct tensile tests and centrifuge model tests were conducted on model barriers. The influence of waste settlement on the long term performance of the barriers was studied by conducting a series of centrifuge model tests. Digital Image Cross-Correlation technique was used in the present study for obtaining the tensile strain in the barrier during settlement. Since, clay is having low tensile strength and low tensile strain at failure, an attempt was made to improve its tensile strength by using polyester discrete geofibers. A custom designed direct tensile test set-up was used to evaluate the tensile strength-strain characteristics of the unreinforced CB and fiber reinforced soil barriers (FB). A flexible wall permeameter was used in the present study for studying the influence of geofibers on the hydraulic conductivity of the barriers. From the present study, it was observed that for the type of fibers, fiber dosage and length and soil used in the present study, the tensile strain at failure was increased to a maximum of 2.5 times and hydraulic conductivity of the soil has not varied drastically and satisfied target hydraulic conductivity requirements for the hydraulic barriers of the landfills.

Keywords

Landfills MSW settlements Tensile tests Flexible wall permeameter Centrifuge modelling 

References

  1. 1.
    LaGatta, M.D., Boardman, B.T., Cooley, B.H., Daniel, D.E.: Geosynthetic clay liner subjected to differential settlement. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 123(5), 402–410 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller, C.J., Rifai, S.: Fiber reinforcement for waste containment soil liners. J. Environ. Eng. ASCE 130(8), 891–895 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang, C.S., Shi, B., Zhao, L.-Z.: Interfacial shear strength of fiber reinforced soil. Geotext. Geomembr. 28(1), 54–62 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sivakumar Babu, G.L., Vasudevan, A.K.: Strength and stiffness response of coir fiber-reinforced tropical soil. J. Mat. Sci. Civil Eng. ASCE 20(9), 571–577 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Viswanadham, B.V.S., Jha, B.K., Pawar, S.N.: Influence of geofibers on the flexural behaviour of compacted soil beams. Geosynth. Int. 17(2), 86–99 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Falorca, I.M.C.F.G., Pinto, M.I.M.: Effect of short, randomly distributed, polypropylene microfibres on shear strength behaviour of soils. Geosynth. Int. 18(1), 2–11 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Divya, P.V., Viswanadham, B.V.S., Gourc, J.P.: Evaluation of tensile strength-strain characteristics of fiber reinforced soil through laboratory tests. J. Mat. Civil Eng. ASCE 26(1), 14–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Divya, P.V., Viswanadham, B.V.S., Gourc, J.P.: Centrifuge model study on the performance of fiber reinforced clay-based landfill covers subjected to flexural distress. Appl. Clay Sci. Elsevier 142, 173–184 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Divya, P.V., Viswanadham, B.V.S., Gourc, J.P.: Centrifuge modelling of geofiber reinforced clay-based landfill covers subjected to flexural distress. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 143(1), 04016076(1–11) (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang, C., Wang, D., Cui, Y., Shi, B., Li, J.: Tensile strength of fiber-reinforced soil. J. Mat. Civil Eng. ASCE 28, 04016031 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliveira, P.J.V., Correia, A.A.S., Teles, J.M.N.P.C., Custódio, D.G.: Effect of fibre type on the compressive and tensile strength of a soft soil chemically stabilised. Geosynth. Int. 23(3), 171–182 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Festugato, L., Menger, E., Benezra, F., Kipper, E.A., Consoli, N.C.: Fibre-reinforced cemented soils compressive and tensile strength assessment as a function of filament length. Geotext. Geomembr. 45(1), 77–82 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hosney, M.S., Rowe, R.K.: Performance of polymer-enhanced bentonite-sand mixture for covering arsenic-rich gold mine tailings for up to 4 years. Can. Geotech. J. 54(4), 588–599 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benson, C.H., Daniel, D.E., Boutwell, G.P.: Field performance of compacted clay liners. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. ASCE 126(5), 390–403 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lavision: DaVis 7.2-strain master software manual, Gottingen, Germany (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Daniel, D.E., Trautwein, S.J., Boynton, S.S., Foreman, D.E.: Permeability testing with flexible-wall permeameters. Geotechn. Test. J. ASTM 7(3), 113–122 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM Standard, D5084: standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rajesh, S., Viswanadham, B.V.S.: Evaluation of geogrid as a reinforcement layer in clay based engineered barriers. Appl. Clay Sci. 42(3–4), 460–472 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. V. Divya
    • 1
  • B. V. S. Viswanadham
    • 2
  • J. P. Gourc
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT PalakkadPalakkadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIIT BombayMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.LTHE, University of Joseph-FourierGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations