Interfacial Peel Strength and Microstructure of Titanium/Aluminium Foil Manufactured by Ultrasonic Consolidation Process

  • Yujie Han
  • Yaoqi Wang
  • Hongliang Hou
  • Yanling Zhang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


An experimental investigation was performed on the ultrasonic consolidation of bi-metallic foil materials, 1100 aluminium and TA1 titanium. The layer-metal composite laminate specimens were prepared using the ultrasonic consolidated Ti/Al foilto investigate effects of amplitude and static force on the interface bonding strength of Ti/Al foil by peel test. In addition, the microstructure morphology observation and energy spectrum analysis of the peeled interfaces were performed using SEM and EDS respectively. The results showed that a good bonding interface of Ti/Al foil was obtained using the ultrasonic consolidation technique. The interface bonding strength increased first then decreased with increasing the static force, while increasing monotonically with increasing the amplitude. The optimum ultrasonic consolidated interface with a peeling strength 11.325 N/mm could be obtained using an amplitude 35 μm and static force 2.0 kN. A uniform distribution of Al element was found in the peeled interface of Ti foil accompanying with the obvious nest microstructure, which further certificated the good interface quality using ultrasonic consolidation process.


Ultrasonic consolidation Peel strength Mechanical property 


  1. 1.
    J. Tsujino, T. Ueoka, Studies on Ultrasonic Welding. Proceeding of the China-Japan Joint Conference on Ultrasonics, (Nanjing, China, 1987), pp. 471–474Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    X.-H. He, H.-J. Shi, Y.-D. Zhang, W.-X. Fu, Z.-G. Yang, C.E. Wilkinson, In-situ scanning electron microscopy studies of small fatigue crack growth in ultrasonic consolidation bonded aluminum 2024 laminated structure. Mater. Lett. 112, 47–50 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.S. Kelly, S.G. Advani, J.W. Gillespie Jr., A model to describe stick–slip transition time during ultrasonic consolidation. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 79, 1931–1937 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Zhang, D. Yi et al., Towards understanding of ultrasonic consolidation process with “process map”. Rapid Prototyping J. 21(4), 461–468 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.J. Friel, R.A. Harris, Ultrasonic additive manufacturing—a hybrid production process for novel functional products. The Seventeenth CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining (ISEM), Procedia CIRP 6, (2013), pp. 35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Christopher, B.S. Hopkins, Development and Characterization of Optimum Process Parameters for Metallic Composites Made by Ultrasonic Consolidation. (Dissertation of Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 2010), pp. 4–100Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.R. Sriraman, M. Gonser, H.T. Fujii, S.S. Babu, M. Bloss, Thermal transients during processing of materials by very high power ultrasonic additive manufacturing. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211, 1650–1657 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.R. Foster, M.J. Dapino, S.S. Babu, Elastic constants of ultrasonic additive manufactured Al 3003-H18. Ultrasonics 53, 211–218 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Mariani, E. Ghassemieh, Microstructure evolution of 6061 O Al alloy during ultrasonic consolidation: an insight from electron backscatter diffraction. Acta Mater. 28, 2492–2503 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Hahnlen, M.J. Dapino, NiTi–Al interface strength in ultrasonic additive manufacturing composites. Compos. B 59, 101–108 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G.S. Kelly, M.S. Just, S.G. Advani, J.W. Gillespie Jr., Energy and bond strength development during ultrasonic consolidation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214, 1665–1672 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.O. Obielodana, B.E. Stucker et al., Optimization of the shear strengths of ultrasonically consolidated Ti/Al 3003 dual-material structures. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 211, 988–995 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Sojiphan, Effects of very high power ultrasonic additive manufacturing process parameters on hardness, microstructure, and texture of aluminum 3003-H18 alloy. Ph. D. Dissertation of The Ohio State University, Ohio, United States, 2015, pp. 23–80Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Obielodan, B. Stucker, A fabrication methodology for dual-material engineering structures using ultrasonic additive manufacturing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 70, 277–284 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yujie Han
    • 1
  • Yaoqi Wang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hongliang Hou
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Yanling Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Beijing Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology Research InstituteBeijingChina
  2. 2.Aeronautical Key Laboratory for Plastic Forming TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Forming Technology and EquipmentBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations