Prospect and Latest Development of Pipeline Integrity Management in China

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

China’s pipeline industry has established a relatively complete technical system of pipeline integrity to solve the major security problems of detections and diagnosis of oil and gas pipeline, which effectively protect the intrinsic safety of pipeline. However, in recent two years, with the development of new materials, big data, cloud computing and other technology, the pipeline whose steel grade is above X80 has been developed successfully, and hydrogen-containing gas pipeline has been put into use. However, there are new technical problems in pipeline industry to be solved, and therefore it is necessary: (1) to gradually establish a big data management architecture model suitable for the pipeline system to study the fusion processing of big data, efficient algorithm and modeling technology, and provide big data decision support for pipeline energy control, disaster management and risk control, (2) to study the failure behavior of hydrogen-induced cracking of pipeline whose steel grade is above X80, find out its failure mechanism, analyze the difference of failure behavior between pipeline whose steel grade is above X80 and pipeline whose steel grade is lower, and finally form a set of integrity evaluation method of pipeline whose steel grade is above X80 in hydrogen-containing environment, (3) to study the reflection of the signal law of electromagnetic control array and piezoelectric ultrasound when they detect cracks and defects, in order to develop defect reflection signal data processing system, and finally develop the crack detection equipment of pipeline whose steel grade is above X80. In this paper the prospect and latest development of pipeline integrity management in China is reviewed.

Keywords

Integrity management Big data Hydrogen induced cracking Crack detection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0805800).

References

  1. 1.
    K. Wang, Application progress of overseas oil and gas pipeline integrity management. Liaoning Chem. Ind. 45(02), 221–222, 225 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.J. Wang, Q. Li, J.Y. Liang, Long-distance pipeline within the test data comparison of the status quo and development trends at home and abroad. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 34, 233–236 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.H. Dong, Z.P. Yang, The latest development of global oil and gas pipeline integrity technology and management—development countermeasures of pipeline integrity management in China. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 26, 1–17 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Qin, Hao D. Hao, J.S. Song, Analysis and application of oil and gas pipeline integrity management system. Pipeline Technol. Equip. 3, 7–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.H. Dong, Pipeline Integrity Management Technology And Practice (Beijing, 2015), pp. 19–31Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Q.S. Feng, H.L. Zhang, Advantages of three-axial high-resolution magnetic flux leakage inspection technology and its application status. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 35(10), 1050–1054 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.S. Bai, Y.J. Zhang, Series of high-resolution pipeline deformation inspecting tools. Oil Forum. 33(01), 51–54 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Z.L. Li, H.F. Zhang, Acoustic emission mechanism and testing of leakage in natural gas pipeline ball valve. J. Vibr. Meas. Diagn. 37(03), 525–531, 630 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y.F. Liu, Q.P. Li, Research progress and development trend of by-pass pigging. Pipeline Tech. Equip. 02, 41–43, 46 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z.X. Song, S.X. Fang, Xie J.L. Xie, Fatigue damage based on stress intensity interference model. J. Beijing Jiaotong Univ. 37, 52–56 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Zhang, P. Feng, J.Y. Yuan, Research progress of missing data processing methods. Chin. J. Hosp. Adm. 19, 301–304 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Guo, F.X. Xu, L.J. Zhou, Pipeline integrity system data integration and application. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 33, 593–598 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Wang, H. Yang, Current status and prospect of inline inspection technologies. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 34(07), 694–698 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    X.X. Lin, Y.X. Li, X. Zhou, Big data environment pipeline management data management. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 34, 349–353 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Huang, Y.Y. Cheng, Y. Ren, Study on feature extraction of image defects based on X-ray weld. Electron. Testing 7, 30–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S.H. Dong, Y. An, Data analysis model for pipeline system and its application based on big data. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 34(10), 1027–1032 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W.W. Xiao, C.L. Song, Risk analysis on surface gathering and transportation pipeline corrosion and perforation in oilfields. Oil-Gas Field Surf. Eng. 36(04), 81–85 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Z.Y. Jiang, Z.L. Li, Y.H. Zhang, Pipeline weld digital ray DR detection technology research. Chem. Ind. 43, 427–429 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y.T. Zhou, S.H. Dong, Q.L. Dong, Emergency decision support system based on integrity management. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 34, 1280–1283 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.H. Dong, H.W. Zhang, Based on big data of the whole life cycle intelligent pipe network solution. Oil Gas Storage Transp. 1, 28–36 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pipeline Technology and Safety Research Center at ChinaUniversity of Petroleum-BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations