Advertisement

A Study of an EOQ Model Under Cloudy Fuzzy Demand Rate

  • Snigdha Karmakar
  • Sujit Kumar De
  • A. Goswami
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 834)

Abstract

This paper deals with a new fuzzy number namely, cloudy fuzzy number and its new defuzzification method for a classical economic order quantity (EOQ) inventory management problem. In fuzzy system, the measures of ambiguity depend upon the area of applicability and the observations of experimenters. The lack of insight over the set consideration causes the invention of new fuzzy set “cloudy fuzzy set”. The traditional assumptions over fuzziness were fixed over time, but in this study we see fuzziness can be removed as time progresses. Here the crisp model is solved first then taking the demand rate as general fuzzy as well as cloudy fuzzy number we have solved the problem under usual Yager’s index method and extension of Yager’s index method respectively. With the help of numerical example we have compared the objective values for all cases and the implication of the cloudy fuzzy number has been discussed exclusively. Graphical illustrations, sensitivity analysis are given for better justification of the model. Finally, a conclusion is made.

Keywords

Inventory Cloudy fuzzy number Cloud index Extension of Yager’s index method Optimization 

References

  1. Allahviranloo, T., Saneifard, R.: Defuzzification method for ranking fuzzy numbers based on center of gravity. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 9(6), 57–67 (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Báez-Sáncheza, A.D., Morettib, A.C., Rojas-Medarc, M.A.: On polygonal fuzzy sets and numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 209, 54–65 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ban, A.I., Coroianu, L.: Existence, uniqueness and continuity of trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers under a general condition. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 257, 3–22 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Manag. Sci. 17, B141–B164 (1970)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley, J.J., Chanas, S.: A fast method of ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Set Syst. 30, 337–339 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, C.H.: A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 95, 307–317 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu, T., Tsao, C.: Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point. Comput. Math. Appl. 43, 111–117 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De, S.K.: Triangular dense fuzzy lock sets. Soft Comput. 1–12 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2726-0
  9. De, S.K., Beg, I.: Triangular dense fuzzy sets and new defuzzification methods. Int. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31, 469–477 (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. De, S.K., Kundu, P.K., Goswami, A.: Economic ordering policy of deteriorated items with shortage and fuzzy cost co-efficients for vendor and buyer. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Rough Syst. 1(2), 69–76 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. De, S.K., Kundu, P.K., Goswami, A.: An economic production quantity inventory model involving fuzzy demand rate and fuzzy deterioration rate. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 12(1), 251–260 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. De, S.K.: EOQ model with natural idle time and wrongly measured demand rate. Int. J. Inventory Control Manag. 3(1–2), 329–354 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. De, S.K., Mahata, G.: Decision of a fuzzy inventory with fuzzy backorder model under cloudy fuzzy demand rate. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math. 3(3), 2593–2609 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-016-0258-4MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De, S.K., Sana, S.S.: Fuzzy order quantity inventory model with fuzzy shortage quantity and fuzzy promotional index. Econ. Model. 31, 351–358 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De, S.K., Sana, S.S.: An EOQ model with backlogging. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. Manag. 11(3), 143–154 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2014.995736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng, H.: Comparing and ranking fuzzy numbers using ideal solutions. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 1638–1646 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Operations on fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 30, 613–626 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ezatti, R., Saneifard, R.: A new approach for ranking of fuzzy numbers with continuous weighted quasi-arithmetic means. Math. Sci. 4, 143–158 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Ezzati, R., Allahviranloo, T., Khezerloo, S., Khezerloo, M.: An approach for ranking of fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 690–695 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghare, P.M., Schrader, G.P.: A model for exponentially decaying inventory. J. Ind. Eng. 14, 238–243 (1963)Google Scholar
  21. Goetschel Jr., R., Voxman, W.: Eigen Fuzzy number sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 16, 75–85 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadley, G., Whitin, T.M.: Analysis of Inventory Systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1963)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Hajjari, T., Abbasbandy, S.: A note on “the revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree”. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 13491–13492 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haneveld, W.K., Teunter, R.H.: Effects of discounting and demand rate variability on the EOQ. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 54, 173–192 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanssmann, F.: Operations Research in Production and Inventory Control. Wiley, New York (1962)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Hariga, M.A.: Optimal EOQ models for deteriorating items with time-varying demand. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 47(10), 1228–1246 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, F.: Operations and Cost. Factory Management Series. Chicago (1915)Google Scholar
  28. Kao, C., Hsu, W.K.: Lot size reorder point inventory model with fuzzy demands. Comput. Math. Appl. 43, 1291–1302 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karmakar, S., De, S.K., Goswami, A.: A pollution sensitive dense fuzzy economic production quantity model with cycle time dependent production rate. Int. J. Clean. Prod. 154, 139–150 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaufmann, A., Gupta, M.M.: Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1992)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar, A., Singh, P., Kaur, P., Kaur, A.: A new approach for ranking of L-R type generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 10906–10910 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar, R.S., De, S.K., Goswami, A.: Fuzzy EOQ models with ramp type demand rate, partial backlogging and time dependent deterioration rate. Int. J. Math. Oper. Res. 4, 473–502 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, H.M., Yao, J.S.: Economic order quantity in fuzzy sense for inventory without back order model. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 105, 13–31 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramli, N., Mohamad, D.: A comparative analysis of centroid methods in ranking fuzzy numbers. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 28(3), 492–501 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. Rezvani, S.: Ranking generalized exponential trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on variance. Appl. Math. Comput. 262, 191–198 (2015)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, Z.X., Liu, Y.J., Fan, Z.P., Feng, B.: Ranking L-R fuzzy number based on deviation degree. Inf. Sci. 179, 2070–2077 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu, P., Su, X., Wu, J., Sun, X., Zhang, Y., Deng, Y.: A note on ranking generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 6454–6457 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yager, R.R.: A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval. Inf. Sci. 24, 143–161 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yu, V.F., Chi, H.T.X., Dat, L.Q., Phuc, P.N.K., Shen, C.W.: Ranking generalized fuzzy numbers in fuzzy decision making based on the left and right transfer coefficients and areas. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 8106–8117 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–356 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, F., Ignatius, J., Lim, C.P., Zhao, Y.: A new method for ranking fuzzy numbers and its application to group decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 1563–1582 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsIIT KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsMidnapore CollegeWest MidnaporeIndia

Personalised recommendations