Service Life Prediction of Underground Concrete Pipeline in Chloride Contaminated Soils

Conference paper

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical model to predict the service life of concrete pipelines in contaminated soils. The service life of concrete pipeline is divided into four stages: the chloride ion diffusion stage, the initial corrosive stress generation stage, the initial crack generation stage and the crack propagation stage. For the first stage, the equation for chloride diffusion is formulated and solved analytically by using the integral transform method. For the other stages, the concrete around a corroding steel reinforcing bar is modeled by a thick-walled cylinder with a wall thickness be equal to the thinnest concrete cover. The concrete pipeline is supposed to reach the end of service life when the crack width exceeds the maximum allowable value at the limit state. The proposed model is validated by comparing the predictions with the numerical simulation results. The analysis results demonstrate that the soil pressure and the concrete cover thickness have significant effects on the service life of concrete pipelines exposed to the chloride contaminated soils.

Keywords

Concrete pipeline Chloride diffusion Steel corrosion Service life Crack 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41772290).

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, Y.: Modeling the time-to-corrosion cracking of the cover concrete in chloride contaminated reinforced concrete structures. ACI Mater. J. 95(6), 675–681 (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maaddawy, T.E., Soudki, K.: A model for prediction of time from corrosion initiation to corrosion cracking. Cement Concr. Compos. 29(3), 168–175 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tuutti, K.: Service life of structures with regard to corrosion of embedded steel. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 77(5), 380–381 (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lu, C., Jin, W., Liu, R.: Reinforcement corrosion-induced cover cracking and its time prediction for reinforced concrete structures. Corros. Sci. 53(4), 1337–1347 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alonso, C., Andrade, C., Rodriguez, J.M., Diez, J.M.: Factors controlling cracking of concrete affected by reinforcement corrosion. Mater. Struct. 31(7), 435–441 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chernin, L., Val, D.V.: Prediction of corrosion-induced cover cracking in reinforced concrete structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 25(4), 1854–1869 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pantazopoulou, S.J., Papoulia, K.D.: Modeling cover-cracking due to reinforcement corrosion in RC structures. J. Eng. Mechanics 127(4), 342–351 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carslaw, H.S., Jaeger, J.C.: Conduction of Heat in Solids. The Clarendon Press, Oxford (1959)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geng, C., Xu, Y., Weng, D., Wu, X.: A time-saving method to determine the chloride threshold level for depassivation of steel in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 24(6), 903–909 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, H., Kong, G., Liu, H.: Study on pile sinking compaction effect of hydrostatic wedge pile using cavity expansion theory. China J. Highw. Transp. 27(4), 24–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reale, T., O’Connor, A.: A review and comparative analysis of corrosion-induced time to first crack models. Constr. Build. Mater. 36(4), 475–483 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of EducationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Geotechnical EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations