Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Blended Learning for the Undergraduate Course “Education and Artificial Intelligence”

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 843)

Abstract

For the ambitious aim toward world-class university, Peking University encourages the blended learning of information and communication technology with classroom teaching for undergraduates. This paper introduces the design and implementation of blended learning approach for the teaching of one undergraduate course “Educational and artificial intelligence”. Along with the traditional face-to-face classroom instruction including individual presentation, discussion and debate, the instructor used course management system Moodle to deliver course resources such as lecture notes and supplementary video clips, and to manage many kinds of learning activities like quizzes and assignments. One field trip was also organized to enrich the students’ hands-on experience. The students’ final score and the overall satisfying result of students’ anonymous evaluation held independently and officially by the university demonstrate that the course’s goal was somewhat achieved, for example the students’ independent thought and innovative spirit were motivated. But how to design blended learning to meet the students’ individual demand is still a great challenge.

Keywords

Blended learning Instructional design Student engagement Student satisfaction Undergraduate course 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is supported by Instruction Reform Project 2017 (No. 20173048) from Office of Educational Administration, Peking University. The author thanks all the students who have participated in the course.

References

  1. Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R.: Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives Local Designs, p. 1. Wiley, San Francisco (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Dziuban, C.D., Hartman, J.L., Moskal, P.D.: Blended learning. Educause Center for Applied Research (ECAR) Research Bulletin, 2004(7) (2004). http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf
  3. Liao, Y.: Effects of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in Taiwan: a meta-analysis. Comput. Educ. 48, 216–233 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Spanjers, I.A.E., Konings, K.D., Leppink, J., Verstegen, D.M.L., de Jong, N., Czabanowska, K., van Merrienboer, J.J.G.: The promised land of blended learning: quizzes as a moderator. Educ. Res. Rev. 15, 59–74 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Singh, H.: Building effective blended learning programs. Issue Educ. Technol. 43, 51–54 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. Tamim, R.M., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P.C., Schmid, R.F.: What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: a second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Rev. Educ. Res. 81, 4–28 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Weizenbaum, J.: ELIZA-a computer program for the study of natural language communication between men and machines. Commun. ACM 9(1), 36–45 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Office of Educational Administration Peking University: Undergraduate course evaluation result (2018). https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/7HKhpWBQS-VIndWLom5AUw

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Technology, School of EducationPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations