Advertisement

Usability of Electronic Patient Records for Assessment and Care Planning in Nursing Homes

  • Kate Shiells
  • Iva Holmerová
  • Olga Štěpánková
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 68/1)

Abstract

Nursing homes are more frequently turning to the electronic patient record (EPR) to manage documentation. Potential benefits associated with EPR include the storage of longitudinal information, interoperability, and improved documentation quality. However, the uptake of EPR in nursing homes has varied considerably across countries, which has been associated with the incompatibility of some EPR systems with this environment. Furthermore, the suitability of EPR for planning dementia care is largely unknown. This study aims to produce recommendations for the future development of EPR systems for use in the assessment and care planning for people with dementia in nursing homes. Case studies of four nursing homes using EPR in Belgium, Czech Republic, Spain and the UK will be conducted. There are two elements to the study: (i) the contextual inquiry method will be employed to explore usability issues with different types of end users. Data will be analysed using qualitative content analysis; (ii) the electronic care plan used in each of the homes will be compared with best practice guidelines for dementia care planning in order to explore the extent to which they include aspects of care that are relevant for people with dementia. Primary data collection will be ongoing throughout 2018, and results will form the basis of recommendations for future EPR development. It is expected that results will lead to improved design of EPR for use in nursing homes, specifically in the assessment and care planning for people with dementia.

Keywords

Dementia care Electronic patient record Nursing home 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

The research presented in this paper was carried out as part of the Marie Curie Initial Training Network (ITN) action, H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015, under grant agreement number 676265, CVUT grant SGS16/231/OHK3/3T/13, and DEMDATA: The Czech Austrian Long-Term Care Project No. GF16-34873L funded by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer Report 2016: Improving healthcare for people living with dementia- Coverage, quality, and costs now and in the future. ADI, London (2016).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calkins, MP. Evidence-based long term care design. Neurorehabilitation 25(3), 145–54 (2009).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alzheimer’s Australia NSW. The Most Difficult Decisions: Dementia and the Move into Residential Aged Care. Discussion Paper 5. Alzheimer’s Australia NSW, North Ryde (2012).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OECD. Dementia Care in 9 OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. OECD, Paris (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer Report 2013: Journey of Caring- An analysis of long-term care for dementia. ADI, London (2013).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Omelan, C. Approach to managing behavioural disturbances in dementia. Canadian Family Physician 52(2), 191–199 (2006).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fournier, D., Gosselin, D., and Rioux, N. The challenges of implementing an electronic medical record system in a long-term care facility. Geriatric Nursing 27(1), 28–30 (2006).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin, A., Hinds, C., and Felix, M. Documentation practices of nurses in long-term care. Journal of Clinical Nursing 8(4), 345–352 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kruse, CS., Mileski, M., Vijaykumar, AG., et al. Impact of Electronic Health Records on Long-Term Care Facilities: Systematic Review. JMIR Medical Informatics 5(3), (2017).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meißner, A., and Schnepp, W. Staff experiences within the implementation of computer-based nursing records in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 14(54), (2014).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phillips, K., Wheeler, C., Campbell, J., and Coustasse, A. Electronic Medical Records in Long-Term Care. Journal of Hospital Marketing & Public Relations 20(2), 131–142 (2010).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, J., and Walji, MF. TURF: Towards a unified framework of EHR usability. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 44(6), 1056–1067 (2011).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sockolow, PS., Bowles, KH., and Rogers, M. Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework (HITREF) Comprehensiveness as Assessed in Electronic Point-of-Care Documentation Systems Evaluations. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 216, 406–409 (2015).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meehan, R. Electronic Health Records in Long-Term Care: Staff Perspectives. Journal of Applied Gerontology 36(10), 1175–1196 (2015).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holtzblatt, K., and Meyer, HR. Contextual Design. In: Soegaard, M., and Dam, RF. (eds.) The Encyclopaedia of Human-Computer Interaction. 2nd edn. The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus (2013).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin, JL., and Crowe, JA. Contextual inquiry for medical device development: A case study. In: Duffy, V. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. CRC Press, Florida (2010).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rubin, J. Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design and Conduct Effective Tests. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sockolow, PS., Crawford, PR., and Lehmann, HP. Broadening a general framework for evaluating health information technology through health services research evaluation principles. Methods of Medical Information 51(2), 122–130 (2012).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nielsen, J., and Landauer, TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERCHI ‘93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 206–213. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1993).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gibson, W., and Brown, A. Working with Qualitative Data. Sage Publications, London (2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of HumanitiesCentre of Expertise in Longevity and Long-Term Care, Charles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.FEE, Department of CyberneticsCzech Technical University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations