Advertisement

Linac Leakage Dose Received by Patients Treated Using Non-coplanar Radiotherapy Beams

  • Tanya KairnEmail author
  • Scott Crowe
  • Samuel Peet
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 68/3)

Abstract

As non-coplanar beams are increasingly used to deliver cranial and extra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy treatments, radiation leakage from the accelerating waveguide, bending magnet and other components of the medical linear accelerator (linac) that are not conventionally brought into proximity to the patient becomes increasingly concerning. In this study, the leakage dose in the patient plane was measured using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters placed along the treatment couch, at 10 cm intervals. A Varian iX linac was operated in 6 and 10 MV photon mode, with all jaws and multi-leaf collimators closed. Dose measurements were made (a) using a “standard” setup, with couch and gantry at zero degrees and (b) using a worst-case non-coplanar setup, with the couch at 90° and the gantry at 30° (rotated over the couch). Results indicated that the leakage dose in the patient plane was uniformly low (less than 2 cGy/10,000MU) at all measurement positions for both energies, using the standard setup. However, when the gantry and couch were rotated, there was a systematic increase in dose to 4.2 cGy/10,000MU at a point 80 cm from isocentre (below the bending magnet). While these doses are within recommended out-of-field dose limits for static beam treatments, if IMRT/VMAT factors are applied then the leakage dose to the patient from non-coplanar treatments may become unacceptable. Specific checks of out-of-field dose from non-coplanar beam directions are advisable prior to acceptance of new or modified linacs.

Keywords

Radiation therapy Radiation protection Dosimetry 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    International Electrotechnical Commission: Medical electrical equipment - Part 2–1: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of electron accelerators in the range 1–50 MeV. 3rd edition. International standard, IEC 60601-2-1 (2009).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wiezorek, T., Georg, D., Schwedas, M., et al.: Experimental determination of peripheral photon dose components for different IMRT techniques and linear accelerators. Z. Med. Phys. 19(2), 120–128 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.01.008.
  3. 3.
    Peet, S.C., Wilks, R., Kairn, T., Crowe, S.B.: Measuring dose from radiotherapy treatments in the vicinity of a cardiac pacemaker. Phys. Medica. 32(12), 1529–1536 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.010.
  4. 4.
    International Atomic Energy Agency: Radiation protection in the design of radiotherapy facilities. Safety reports series No. 47. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2006).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saleh, Z.H., Jeong, J., Quinn, B., et al.: Results of a 10 year survey of workload for 10 treatment vaults at a high throughput comprehensive cancer center. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys. 18(3), 207–214 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12076.
  6. 6.
    Kairn, T., Crowe, S.B., Trapp, J.V.: Correcting radiation survey data to account for increased leakage during intensity modulated radiotherapy treatments. Med. Phys. 40(11) 111708 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4823776.
  7. 7.
    Bordy, J.M., Bessieres, I., d’Agostino, E., et al.: Radiotherapy out-of-field dosimetry: Experimental and computational results for photons in a water tank. Radiat. Meas. 57, 29–34 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.06.010.
  8. 8.
    Jursinic, P.A.: Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med. Phys. 34(12), 4594–4604 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2804555.
  9. 9.
    Scarboro, S.B., Followill, D.S., Kerns, J.R., et al.: Energy response of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters for non-reference measurement locations in a 6 MV photon beam. Phys. Med. Biol. 57(9), 2505–2515 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/57/9/2505.
  10. 10.
    Asena, A., Crowe, S.B., Kairn, T., et al.: Response variation of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Radiat. Meas. 61, 21–24 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.12.004.
  11. 11.
    Lonski, P., Taylor, M.L., Franich, R.D., et al.: Assessment of leakage doses around the treatment heads of different linear accelerators. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 152(4), 304–312 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs049.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Brisbane and Women’s HospitalBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations