Advertisement

Expansion Microscopy for Brain Imaging

Chapter
Part of the Progress in Optical Science and Photonics book series (POSP, volume 5)

Abstract

Understanding the organ-wide molecular architecture of proteins is required to dissect the mechanisms of various diseases and answer many scientific questions. Accordingly, there is a significant need for an imaging methodology that is capable of imaging proteins at nanoscale resolution over whole organs. In 2015, a technique called expansion microscopy (ExM) was developed. This technique increases the resolution of conventional microscopy several-fold by physically expanding a specimen with a swellable polymer network. After expansion, specimens become transparent, enabling super-resolution imaging of relatively thick tissue slices without ultra-thin sectioning. Recently, multiple ExM variants which demonstrated expansion microscopy with conventional fluorophore-conjugated antibodies, super-resolution imaging of RNA in cells and tissue slices via expansion, multiplexed protein imaging via post-expansion antibody staining, and sub-20-nm resolution via expanding specimens more than 20-fold have been developed. This chapter presents the detailed molecular principles of ExM and its variants to understand the differences between various ExM-related techniques.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Samsung Research Funding & Incubation Center for Future Technology (SRFC-IT1702-09). In addition, this work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1B03035340, NRF-2017R1A6A1A03015642) and the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2017M3C7A1043841).

References

  1. 1.
    M.J. Rust, M. Bates, X. Zhuang, Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat. Methods 3, 793 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.T. Dempsey, J.C. Vaughan, K.H. Chen, M. Bates, X. Zhuang, Evaluation of fluorophores for optimal performance in localization-based super-resolution imaging. Nat. Methods 8, 1027–1036 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.C. Vaughan, S. Jia, X. Zhuang, Ultrabright photoactivatable fluorophores created by reductive caging. Nat. Methods 9, 1181–1184 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Olivier, D. Keller, P. Gönczy, S. Manley, Resolution doubling in 3D-STORM imaging through improved buffers. PLoS ONE 8, e69004 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Engerer, C. Fecher, T. Misgeld, Super-resolution microscopy writ large. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 928 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Chen, P. Tillberg, E.S. Boyden, Expansion microscopy. Science (80) 347, 543 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Chen et al., Nanoscale imaging of RNA with expansion microscopy. Nat. Methods 13, 679–684 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.-B. Chang et al., Iterative expansion microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 593–599 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P.W. Tillberg et al., Protein-retention expansion microscopy of cells and tissues labeled using standard fluorescent proteins and antibodies. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 987–992 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Cang, et al., Ex-STORM: expansion single molecule nanoscopy. bioRxiv (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y.S. Zhang et al., Hybrid microscopy: enabling inexpensive high-performance imaging through combined physical and optical magnifications. Sci. Rep. 6, 22691 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T.J. Chozinski et al., Expansion microscopy with conventional antibodies and fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 13, 485–488 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    T. Ku et al., Multiplexed and scalable super-resolution imaging of three-dimensional protein localization in size-adjustable tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 973 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Zhao et al., Nanoscale imaging of clinical specimens using pathology-optimized expansion microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 757 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    I.E. Wang, S.W. Lapan, M.L. Scimone, T.R. Clandinin, P.W. Reddien, Hedgehog signaling regulates gene expression in planarian glia. Elife 5, e16996 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.J. Mosca, D.J. Luginbuhl, I.E. Wang, L. Luo, Presynaptic LRP4 promotes synapse number and function of excitatory CNS neurons. Elife 6, e27347 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Freifeld et al., Expansion microscopy of zebrafish for neuroscience and developmental biology studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706281114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.R. Crittenden et al., Striosome–dendron bouquets highlight a unique striatonigral circuit targeting dopamine-containing neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 11318–11323 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y. Suofu et al., Dual role of mitochondria in producing melatonin and driving GPCR signaling to block cytochrome c release. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, E7997–E8006 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C.K. Cahoon et al., Superresolution expansion microscopy reveals the three-dimensional organization of the Drosophila synaptonemal complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, E6857–E6866 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Deshpande et al., Subcellular reorganization and altered phosphorylation of the astrocytic gap junction protein connexin43 in human and experimental temporal lobe epilepsy. Glia 65, 1809–1820 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H.M.T. Choi, V.A. Beck, N.A. Pierce, Next-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: higher gain, lower cost, greater durability. ACS Nano 8, 4284–4294 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Cai, K.B. Cohen, T. Luo, J.W. Lichtman, J.R. Sanes, Improved tools for the Brainbow toolbox. Nat. Methods 10, 540–547 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations