Advertisement

Memory, Empathy, and Narrative in Meena Kandasamy’s The Gypsy Goddess

  • Punyashree Panda
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter interrogates metanarratives and national history by using memory, both collective and personal, as a site of contestation and resistance in the service of the marginalized. Through a close reading of The Gypsy Goddess, Meena Kandasamy’s debut novel on the historical massacre of Dalit labourers that took place in Kilvenmani, southern India, on Christmas Eve 1968, this chapter examines the dynamic interplay between memory, empathy, and narrative. It demonstrates how the use of an unconventional and self-reflexive narrative mode allows the author to retrieve subaltern South Asian history and simultaneously assert a non-Western, and specifically Tamil, perspective in an English-language novel.

Keywords

Meena kandasamy Kilvenmani massacre Dalit novel Memory History Caste 

References

  1. Bandes, Susan. 1996. “Empathy, Narrative, and Victim Impact Statements.” University of Chicago Law Review 63 (2): 361–342. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 2006. “(i) Operation Margarine; (ii) Myth Today.” In Media and Cultural Studies: Key Works, edited by Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas M. Kellner, 2nd ed., 99–106. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Buck-Morss, Susan. 2010. “The Gift of the Past.” Small Axe 14 (3(33)): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatani, Lajwanti. 2014. “Re-turning the Idea of Minority: Going Beyond the Politics of Recognition.” In Becoming Minority: How Discourses and Policies Produce Minorities in Europe and India, edited by Jyotimaya Tripathy and Sudarshan Padmanabhan, 47–64. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Festino, Cielo Griselda. 2015. “Dalit Women Life-Narratives and Literature as Experience.” Maringá 37 (1): 25–36. http://periodicos.uem.br.
  6. Friedman, Jonathan. 1992. “Myth, History and Political Identity.” Cultural Anthropology 7 (2): 194–210. https://culanth.org/articles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hutton, Patrick. 2000. “Recent Scholarship on Memory and History.” The History Teacher 33 (4): 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ifrim, Nicoleta D. 2017. “Memory and Identity-Focused Narratives in Tănase’s ‘Lived Book’.” Comparative Literature and Culture 19 (2): 1–10. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu.
  9. Kandasamy, Meena. 2014. The Gypsy Goddess. New Delhi: Fourth Estate Print.Google Scholar
  10. Keen, Suzanne. 2006. “A Theory of Narrative Empathy.” Narrative 14 (3): 207–236. http://brainnarratives.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klien, Kerwin Lee. 2000. “On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse.” Representations 69: 127–150. http://www.history.ucsb.edu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knepper, Wendy, and Sharae Deckard. 2016. “Towards a Radical World Literature: Experimental Writing in a Globalizing World.” Ariel: A Review of International English Literature 47 (1–2): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCullagh, C. Behan. 2005. “Postmodernism and the Truth of History.” Historically Speaking 6 (3): 8–10. https://muse.jhu.edu.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nora, Pierre. 1989. Translated by Marc Roudebush. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoir.” Representations 26: 7–24. https://www.jstor.org.
  15. Nissim-Sabat, Marilyn. 2003. Review. The Violence of Interpretation: From Pictogram to Statement by Pierra Aulagnier. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31–34. http://www.apadivisions.org/division-39.
  16. Phillips, Mark Salber. 2004. “Distance and Historical Representation.” History Workshop Journal 57: 123–141. http://muse.jhu.edu/article/169637. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schrauf, Robert W., and Daiv C. Rubin. 2003. “On the Bilingual’s Two Sets of Memories.” In Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of Narrative Self: Developmental and Cultural Perspectives, edited by Robyn Fivush and Catherine A. Haden, 121–146. New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
  18. Sermijn, Jasmine, Patrick Devieger, and Gerrit Loots. 2008. “The Narrative Construction of the Self: Selfhood as a Rhizomatic Story.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (10): 1–19. http://online.sagepub.com.
  19. Searle, John. 1965. “What is a Speech Act?” In Philosophy in America, edited by Maurice Black, 221–239. London: Allen and Unwin. jwood.faculty.unlv.edu/unlv/Articles/SearleWhatIsASpeechAct.pdf.
  20. Somers, Margaret R. 1994. “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach.” Theory and Society 23: 605–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Winter, Alison. 2012. Memory: Fragments of a Modern History. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. White, Hayden. 1992. “Historical Emplotment and the Problem of Truth.” In Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the Final Solution, edited by Saul Friedländer, 37–53. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2009. “Postmodernism and Historiography.” Special Public Opening Symposium Ritsumeikan University “After Metahistory: Lecture on Postmodernism by Professor Hayden White.” http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp.
  24. Wydra, Herald. 2015. “The Dynamics of Memory in East and West: Elements of a Comparative Network.” Remembrance and Solidarity Studies 1: 1–19. http://enrs.eu/en/articles/1509.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Punyashree Panda
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology BhubaneswarBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations