Advertisement

Mental Model Alignment

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Operations Research book series (BRIEFSOPERAT)

Abstract

Group model building describes a variety of methods for involving clients or stakeholders in the creation of a system dynamics model. One outcome sought by clients is enduring consensus between participants. Group model building appears to support enduring consensus by altering and aligning the mental models held by participants about the problem. Mental models are a construct from cognitive science to describe a relatively enduring internal representation of an external reality. This chapter infers mental model change and alignment through the elicitation of decision-preferences immediately before a group model building workshop, immediately afterwards, and twelve months later.

References

  1. Abel N, Ross H, Walker P (1998) Mental models in rangeland research, communication and management. Rangel J 20:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen DF, Richardson GP, Vennix JAM (1997) Group model building: adding more science to the craft. Syst Dyn Rev 13(2):187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrowsmith DK, Place C (1990) An introduction to dynamical systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bainbridge L (1991) Mental models and cognitive skill: the example of industrial process operation. In: Rutherford A and Rogers Y (eds) Models in the mind. Academic Press, New York, pp 119–144Google Scholar
  5. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S (1993) Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan NJ (ed) Individual and group decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 221–246Google Scholar
  6. Cavana RY, Delahaye BL, Sekaran U (2001) Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. Wiley, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen LB (2007) Experimental methodology. Boston MA, PearsonGoogle Scholar
  8. Carley K, Palmquist M (1992) Extracting, representing and analyzing mental models. Soc Forces 70:601–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capelo C, Dias JF (2009) A system dynamics-based simulation experiment for testing mental model and performance effects of using the balanced scorecard. Syst Dyn Rev 25:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Craik KJW (1943) The nature of explanation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle JK (1997) The cognitive psychology of systems thinking. Syst Dyn Rev 13:263–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle JK, Ford DN (1998) Mental model concepts for system dynamics research. Syst Dyn Rev 14(3):29Google Scholar
  13. Doyle JK, Radzicki MJ, Trees WS (2008) Measuring change in mental models of complex dynamic systems. In: Qudrat-Ullah H, Spector JM, Davidsen PI (eds) Complex Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–294Google Scholar
  14. Dray A, Perez P, Le Page C, D’Aquino P, White I (2007) Who wants to terminate the game? The role of vested interests and meta-players in the Atoll Game experience. Simulation and Gaming 38:494–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eden CE (1995) On evaluating the performance of ‘wide-band’ GDSS’s. Eur J Oper Res 81:302–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faw TT, Pien D (1971) The influence of stimulus exposure on rated preference: effects of age, pattern of exposure, and stimulus meaningfulness. J Exp Child Psychol 11(3):339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischoff B, Beyth R (1975) “I knew it would happen” Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organ Behav Human Perform 13:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fokkinga B, Bleijenbergh I, Vennix JAM (2009) Group model building evaluation in single cases: a method to assess changes in mental models. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international system dynamics conference. System Dynamics Society, Chestnut HillGoogle Scholar
  19. Forrester JW (1971) Principles of systems. Productivity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Forrester JW (1975) Collected papers of Jay W. Forrester. Wright-Allen Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentner D, Stevens AL (1983) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gary MS, Wood RE (2011) Mental models, decision rules, and performance heterogeneity. Strateg Manage J 32:560–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Größler A, Thun JH, Milling PM (2008) System dynamics as a structural theory in operations management. Prod Oper Manag 17(3):373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartnett T (2011) Consensus-oriented decision making. New Society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  25. Holsti OR (1969) Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley: ReadingGoogle Scholar
  26. Huz S (1999) Alignment from group model building for systems thinking: measurement and evaluation from a public policy setting. Ph.D. thesis. New York, State University New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen E, Brehmer B (2003) Understanding and control of a simple dynamic system. Syst Dyn Rev 19(2):119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson TE, Lee Y, Lee M, O'Connor DL, Khalil MK, Huang X (2007) Measuring sharedness of team-related knowledge: design and validation of a shared mental model instrument. Human Resour Dev Int 10(4):437–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1):46Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, values, frames. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Kearney AR, Kaplan S (1997) Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: The conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environ Behav 29:579–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Langan-Fox J, Code S, Langfield-Smith K (2000) Team mental models: Techniques, methods, and analytic approaches. Hum Factors 42:242–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Langan-Fox J, Wirth A, Code S, Langfield-Smith K, Wirth A (2001) Analyzing shared and team mental models. Int J Ind Ergon 28:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Langfield-Smith K (1992) Exploring the need for a shared cognitive map. J Manage Stud 29(3):349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lane DC (2003) Should system dynamics be described as a ‘hard’ or ‘deterministic’ systems approach? Syst Res Behav Sci 17(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lane DC (2008) The emergence and use of diagramming in system dynamics: a critical account. Syst Res Behav Sci 25(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynam T, Mathevet R, Etienne M, Stone-Jovicich S, Leitch A, Jones N, Ross H, Du Toit D, Pollard S, Biggs H, Perez P (2012) Waypoints on a journey of discovery: mental models in human-environment interactions. Ecol Soc 17(3):23Google Scholar
  39. Markó́czy L, Goldberg J (1995) A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps. J Manag 21:305–333Google Scholar
  40. Moray N (1998) Identifying mental models of complex human-machine systems. Int J Ind Ergon 22:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moray N (2004) Models of models of…mental models. In: Moray N (ed) Ergonomics: major writings. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 506–526Google Scholar
  42. Nersessian NJ (2002) The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In: Carruthers P, Stich S, Siegal M (eds) The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–153Google Scholar
  43. Ozesmi U, Ozesmi SL (2004) Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: A multistep fuzzy cognition mapping approach. Ecol Modell 176:43–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richardson GP, Pugh AL (1981) Introduction to system dynamics modeling with DYNAMO. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Richardson GP, Andersen DF, Maxwell TA, Stewart TR (1994) Foundations of mental model research. In: Proceedings of the 1994 international system dynamics conference. System Dynamics Society, Chestnut HillGoogle Scholar
  46. Rouse WB, Morris NM (1986) On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychol Bull 100:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM (2006) System dynamics and organizational interventions. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(4):451–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM, van Mullekom T (2002) Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies. Syst Dyn Rev 18(1):5–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rowe AL, Cooke NJ (1995) Measuring mental models: choosing the right tools for the job. Hum Resour Dev Q 6:243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schaffernicht M (2006) Detecting and monitoring change in models. Syst Dyn Rev 22:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schaffernicht M, Größer SN (2009) What’s in a mental model of a dynamic system? Conceptual structure and model comparison. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international conference of the system dynamics society. System Dynamics Society, Chestnut HillGoogle Scholar
  52. Schaffernicht M, Größer SN (2011) A comprehensive method for comparing mental models of dynamic systems. Eur J Oper Res 210:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaffernicht M, Größer SN (2012) Learning to think in circles: Improving mental models of a dynamic system. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference of the system dynamics society. System Dynamics Society, Chestnut HillGoogle Scholar
  54. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2001) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, 2nd edn. Wadsworth, Cengage LearningGoogle Scholar
  55. Steinert Y, Nasmith L, Daigle N (2003) Executive skills for medical faculty: a workshop description and evaluation. Med Teach 25(6):666–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stone-Jovicich SS, Lynam T, Leitch S, Jones NA (2011) Using consensus analysis to assess mental models about water use and management in the Crocodile River catchment, South Africa. Ecol Soc 16(1):45Google Scholar
  57. Thompson JP (2009) How and under what conditions client learn in system dynamics consulting engagements. Ph.D. thesis. Strathclyde Business School,GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  58. Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn psychol 5:207–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van den Belt M (2000) Mediated modelling: a collaborative approach for the development of shared understanding and evaluation of environmental policy scenarios. With case studies in the Fox River Basin, Wisconsin and the Ria Formosa, Portugal. PhD thesis. University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  60. van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modelling: a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  61. Vennix JAM (1990) Mental models and computer models: Design and evaluation of a computer based learning environment for policy-making. Ph.D. thesis. Radboud University: NijmegenGoogle Scholar
  62. Vennix JAM (1996) Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  63. Vennix JAM, Andersen DF, Richardson GP, Rohrbaugh J (1992) Model-building for group decision support: issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation. Eur J Oper Res 59(1):28–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson JR, Rutherford A (1989) Mental models: theory and application in human factors. Hum Factors 31:617–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S (2009) The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water Resour Manage 23(7):1301–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations