Skip to main content

Toleration in Practice (2): The Governance of Absenteeism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Toleration

Part of the book series: New Perspectives on Chinese Politics and Society ((NPCPS))

  • 163 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the author illustrates the tolerating strategy through the example of absenteeism management at Jinjiang Factory. The author argues that it embodies the group leaders’ tolerance and consideration toward every member’s exceptional circumstances. In so doing, the leaders win the members’ recognition and support. More importantly, through the solicitation of others’ assistance, this tolerance and consideration is exchanged among members, through which the group’s internal cohesion is gradually strengthened. In order to accumulate material support for this form of governance, group leaders invent a series of tactics. These help them to provide their members with more free time while maintaining their income at a certain level. In a word, it is the toleration that strengthens the group’s internal connections and guarantees the basic production in the face of interruptions.

The workshop was a battlefield. Whether you could win the war depended on your own talents. You needed to know how to unite this disparate group of individuals (sanjiao jiuliu)

Fu Jinhai, December 22, 2013

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At this point, the reinterpretation of absenteeism as the exceptional circumstances shares the philosophical basis of the Renqing, which was argued by Zhai Xuewei (2013).

  2. 2.

    Interview with Fu Jinhai.

  3. 3.

    Interview with Fu Jinhai, Chen Mingzhen, Fang Mingqi, and GuJiwei.

  4. 4.

    Interview with Fu Jinhai, Chen Mingzhen, Fang Mingqi, and GuJiwei.

  5. 5.

    Interview with Zhu Baogui.

  6. 6.

    Interview with Fang Wensheng.

  7. 7.

    Interview with Gu Jiwei.

  8. 8.

    Interview with Fang Wensheng.

  9. 9.

    Interview with Yu Xuehui.

References

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Yanjie. 1997. Bring Strong Ties Back in: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China, American Sociological Review, 62(3):366–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Anita and Jonathan Unger. 1982 (Fall). Grey and Black: The Hidden Economy of Rural China, Pacific Affairs, 55(3):452–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1965. Systems of Analysis of Political Life, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeh, Peter P. 1974. Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luedtke, Alf. 1986. Cash, Coffee-Breaks, Horseplay: ‘Eigensinn’ and Politics Among Factory Workers in Germany circa 1900, in Hanagan, Michael and Charles Stephenson, eds. Confrontation, Class Consciousness, and the Labor Process, Westport: Greenwood Press, 65–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, Dorothy. 1983. Marxism and Market in Socialist China: The Reforms of 1979–1980 in Context, in Nee, Victor and David Mozingo, eds. State and Society in Contemporary China, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 194–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, Andrew G. 1986. Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, Brantly. 1991 (June). Transfigured Community: Neo-Traditionalism and Work Unit Socialism in China, The China Quarterly, 126:313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Approaches, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Mayfair Mei-hui. 1989 (January). The Gift Economy and State Power in China, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31(1):25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Minghua and Theo Nichols. 1996 (July). Management Control of Labor in State-Owned Enterprises: Cases from the Textile Industry, The China Journal, 36:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Xueguang. 1999. Review on the Studies of Institutional Change of Chinese Organizations in Western Sociology, The Study of Sociology, 4:26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, Xuewei. 2013. Face, Favor and Reproduction of Power, Beijing: Beijing University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chen, C. (2018). Toleration in Practice (2): The Governance of Absenteeism. In: Toleration. New Perspectives on Chinese Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8941-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8941-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8940-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8941-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics