Skip to main content

Organizational Sustainability—Why the Need for Green HRM?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Flexible Systems Management ((FLEXSYS))

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of change when sustainability programs were implemented, in addition to the drivers of sustainability initiatives and organizational performance . The large, Asia-Pacific based professional services company where the study was undertaken had introduced a number of sustainability initiatives prior to this investigation. An employee survey concerning the company’s sustainability program and change processes was conducted consisting of 70 questions. The sample comprised 2557 respondents representing every hierarchical level. Opportunity was also provided for open ended comments. Findings showed that while employee involvement, accountability, leadership support and commitment were important drivers of sustainability initiatives , they were perceived as lacking in this organization. Moreover, teams lacked the ability to change business practices and there was a lack of recognition and reward related to any sustainability improvements. The implications of the study are that, despite environmental sustainability being of great concern to employees personally, it did not translate to the corporate agenda, which was mainly focused on ‘compliance’. This led to frustration amongst some employees who were undertaking sustainability initiatives at home but were unable to translate them to their workplaces, reportedly because there was an apparent absence of any sustainable leadership or promotion of any Green HRM initiatives in this organization. This value of this study is that it emphasises that, if senior management introduces sustainability initiatives without any attempt to embed them within company practice/client relationships , reward systems and more, they are likely to fail and attempts to introduce a circular economy need to be accompanied by ‘Green HRM ’ policies and practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C. A., & Frost, G. R. (2008). Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum, 32(4), 288–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Department of Climate Change. (2008). Carbon pollution reduction scheme: Australia’s low pollution future. White Paper. Available at http://www.climatechange.gov.au/whitepaper/report/index.html.

  • Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing business resilience and performance. Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, R. J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., & Bolton, D. (2011). Key concepts in corporate social responsibility. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, S., & Dunphy, D. C. (Eds.) (2007) Corporate governance and sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, M., & Leon, W. (1999). The consumer’s guide to effective environmental choices: Practical advice from the union of concerned scientists. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, B., & Huang, S. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(12), 1539–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1996). Beyond growth: The economics of sustainable development. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doppelt, B. (2003). Leading change toward sustainability. A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S. (2007). Organizational change for corporate sustainability (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line for 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enticott, G., & Walker, R. M. (2008). Sustainability, performance and organizational strategy: An empirical analysis of public organizations. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17, 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J., & Roy, M. J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning, 34(5), 585–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, K. M., Worrell, D. L., Davidson, W. N., III, & El-Jelly, A. (2000). Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: The differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. Journal of Management, 26, 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hak, T., Moldan, B., & Dahl, A. L. (2007). Sustainability indicators, SCOPE 67. London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, J., Lundqvist, U., Robèrt, K.-H., & Wackernagel, M. (1999). The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 6, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, J., & Robert, K.-H. (2000). Backcasting from non-overlapping sustainability principles—A framework for strategic planning. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 7, 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, D. (2010). Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 28(8), 818–831.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, H. H., Owen, L., & Neus, A. (2008). IBM global making change work. Somers: IBM Global Business Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q., & Douglas, T. J. (1998). Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. Q., & Elenkov, D. (2005). Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: An empirical assessment of bulgarian firms. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 893–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(8), 1069–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2013.816863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramar, R., & Jones, G. (2010). Sustainability in strategic human resource management. Prahran, VIC: Tilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paehlke, R. (2005). Sustainability as a bridging concept. Conservation Biology, 19, 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, W. (2008). Achieving exceptional performance across times of change. Whitepaper, ChangeTrack Research CTRE, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, W., Kirsch, C., Carey, P., & Shaw, D. (2013). Empirical development of a model of performance drivers in organisational change projects. Journal of Change Management, 14(1), 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009). Sustainability yearbook. http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/A1A21B9F14C2FBF985257552007570E9. Retrieved June 22, 2009.

  • Pujari, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive. Influences on environmental new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 56, 657–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, C. A. (2002). Encouraging innovative environmental actions: What companies and managers must do. Journal of World Business, 37, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, D., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2008). Green HRM: A review, process model, and research agenda. University of Sheffield Management School Discussion Paper, 1, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C., & Cuthbertson, C. (2003). The state of IT Project management in the UK 2002–2003. Oxford: Templeton College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., Pablo, A, & Vredenburg, H. (1999). Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speth, J. G. (2008). The bridge at the edge of the world: Capitalism, the environment, and crossing from crisis to sustainability. Devon: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O., Koellner, T., Habegger, D., Steffensen, H., & Ohnemus, O. (2005). The relation between sustainability performance and financial performance of firms. GOE Report No. 5-2005, GOE, Zurich. www.goe.ch.

  • Wilkinson, A., Hill, M., & Gollan, P. (2001). The sustainability debate. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(12), 1492–1502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoogah, D. B. (2011). The dynamics of Green HRM behaviours: A cognitive social information processing approach. German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management, 25(2), 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Connell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirsch, C., Connell, J. (2018). Organizational Sustainability—Why the Need for Green HRM?. In: Connell, J., Agarwal, R., Sushil, Dhir, S. (eds) Global Value Chains, Flexibility and Sustainability. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8929-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics