Mature Learners’ Participation in Higher Education and Flexible Learning Pathways: Lessons Learned from an Exploratory Experimental Research

  • Rogério Duarte
  • Ana Luísa de Oliveira Pires
  • Ângela Lacerda Nobre
Chapter

Abstract

Higher education institutions play an important role in promoting equity and access conditions to mature learners. Such role includes the ethical commitment to facilitate learning processes, removing barriers to mature learners’ entry and persistence in higher education. This paper describes the implementation of flexible learning pathways in a technology and industrial management graduate course designed for mature learners. Findings confirm that mature learners welcome flexible learning pathways and choose the pathways that better suit their needs. Despite initial academic background differences, success rates are adequate and similar for different learning pathways, showing that mature learners are capable of bridging the gaps in their academic development. Findings also show that doubts related to the impact of some learning pathways on students’ academic integration are unfounded. Considering the positive results, it is concluded that flexible learning pathways, together with the widening of entry routes to higher education, promote equity and access conditions to mature learners.

Keywords

Higher education Mature learners Equity Flexible learning Learning pathways 

References

  1. 1.
    European Union Council (2011) Council conclusions on the role of education and training in the implementation of the ‘Europe 2020’ strategy. Off J Eur Union (2011/C 70/01) (E.U.)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OECD (2015) OECD statistic extracts database. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode=RENRLAGE. Accessed June 2015
  3. 3.
    Schuetze H, Slowey M (2000) Higher education and lifelong learners. International perspectives on change. Routledge Falmer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jarvis P (1987) Meaningful and meaningless experience: towards an analysis of learning from life. Adult Educ Q 37:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kenner C, Weinerman J (2011) Adult learning theory: applications to non-traditional college students. J Coll Reading Learn 41:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pires A (2009) Novos públicos no Ensino Superior em Portugal. Contributos para uma problematização. In: Rummert, Canário, Frigotto (org) Políticas de Formação de jovens e adultos no Brasil e em Portugal. Ed. UFF, Rio de Janeiro, pp 185–205Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirkpatrick D (1997) Becoming flexible: contested territory. Stud Contin Educ 19:160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collis B, Vingerhoets J, Moonen J (1997) Flexibility as a key construct in European training: experiences from the telescopia project. Br J Educ Technol 28:199–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bean J, Metzner B (1985) A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Rev Educ Res 55:485–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cross K (1981) Adults as learners. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lynch J, Bishop-Clark C (1994) The influence of age in college classrooms: some new evidence. Community Coll Rev 22:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pires A (2016) Between challenges and trends of lifelong learning: higher Education and the recognition of prior experiential learning. In: Jongbloed B, Vossensteyn H (eds) Access and expansion post-massification. opportunities and barriers to further growth in higher education particpation. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Griffiths V, Kaldi S, Pires A (2008) Adult learners and entry to higher education: motivation, prior experience and entry requirements. In: Munoz M, Jalinek I, Ferreira F (eds) Proceedings of the international association of scientific knowledge teaching and learning conference, 26–28 May 2008, Aveiro, Portugal. International association of scientific knowledge teaching and learning, Aveiro, pp 632–640Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pires A (2009) Higher education and adult motivation towards lifelong learning. Eur J vocat train 46:130–150Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pereira E (2009) Alunos maiores de 23 anos: Motivações para o ingresso no ensino superior na Universidade do Porto. Dissertação de Mestrado em Sociologia, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do PortoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fragoso A, Valadas S (2013) Older mature students in higher education. In: Paper presented at ESREA—4th international conference learning ppportunities for older adults: forms, providers and policies, 23–25 October 2013, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateitiesstr. 20 Vilnius, LithuaniaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quintas H, Fragoso A, Bago J, Gonçalves, Ribeiro T, Monteiro M, Fragoso A, Santos L, Fonseca M (2014) Estudantes adultos no Ensino Superior: O que os motiva e o que os desafia no regresso à vida académica. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 27(2):33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carré P (1998) Motifs et dynamiques d’engagement en formation. Synthèse d’une étude qualitative de validation auprès de 61 adults en formation profissionnelle continue. Education Permanente 136:119–131Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carré P (2000) Motivation in adult education: from engagement to performance. In: Proceedings of the 41st annual adult education research conference, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tinto V (1975) Dropout from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Rev Educ Res 45(1):279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tharp J (1998) Predicting persistence of urban commuter campus students utilizing student background characteristics from enrolment data. Community Coll J Res Pract 22(3):279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lourenço R, Ferreira E, Duarte R, Gonçalves H, Duarte J (2013) IPS’ technology and industrial management graduate course: a curriculum follow-up analysis. In: Morgado J, Alves M, Viana I, Ferreira C, Seabra F, Hattum-Janssen N, Pacheco J (eds) European conference on curriculum studies, future directions: uncertainty and possibility, University of Minho, pp 263–269Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duarte R, Ramos-Pires A, Gonçalves H (2014) Identifying art-risk students in higher education. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 25:944–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bell T, Cockburn A, McKenzie B, Vargo J (2001) Flexible delivery damaging to learning? Lessons from the Canterbury digital lectures project. University of Cantebury. http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/10092/517/1/42637_edmedia.pdf. Accessed June 2015
  25. 25.
    Dobozy E (2008) ‘Plan your study around your life, not the other way around’: How are semi-engaged students coping with flexible access. In: Proceedings of EDU-COM conferenceGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Almeida L, Soares P (2002) Questionário de Vivências Acadêmicas (QVAr): Avaliação do ajustamento dos estudantes universitários. Avaliação Psicológica 2:81–93Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Almeida L, Soares AP, Guisande M, Paisana J (2007) Rendimento académico no ensino superior: Estudo com alunos do 1º ano. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxia e Educación 14:207–220Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Igue E, Bariani I, Milanesi P (2008) Vivência acadêmica e expectativas de universitários ingressantes e concluintes. Psico-USF 13:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arbuckle J (2011) IBM SPSS (version 20.0) [Computer Program]. SPSS, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jones S, Richardson J (2002) Designing an IT-augmented student-centred learning environment. In: Proceedings of HERDSA conference. Perth, Australia, pp 376–383Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McShane K, Peat M, Masters A (2007) Playing it safe? Students’ study preferences in a flexible chemistry module. Aust J Educ Chem 67:24–30Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pires A (2010) Aprendizagem ao Longo da Vida, Ensino Superior e novos públicos: uma perspectiva internacional. In: Aprendizagem ao Longo da Vida e Políticas Educativas Europeias: Tensões e ambiguidades nos discursos e nas práticas de Estados, Instituições e Indivíduos. UIED, Colecção Educação e Desenvolvimento, FCT / Universidade Nova de Lisboa, pp 107–137Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jameson M, Fusco B (2014) Math anxiety, math self-concept, and math self-efficacy in adult learners compared to traditional undergraduate students. Adult Educ Q 64:306–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rogério Duarte
    • 1
  • Ana Luísa de Oliveira Pires
    • 1
  • Ângela Lacerda Nobre
    • 1
  1. 1.Escola Superior de Tecnologia de SetúbalInstituto Politécnico de SetúbalSetúbalPortugal

Personalised recommendations