Advertisement

Toward Carbon Certificate in Vietnam: Net Ecosystem Production and Basic Income for the Local Community

  • Tran Van Do
  • Tamotsu Sato
Chapter
Part of the Asia in Transition book series (AT, volume 7)

Abstract

In recent years, ecologists have focused on estimating Net Ecosystem Production (NEP) to understand the role of forests against increasing concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere, a major concern in researches and debates on global warming. This is due to the fact that NEP of a forest is the amount of carbon accumulated in a unit of area and time. This chapter discusses NEP in tropical broad-leaved forests of the Copia Natural Reserve, northwest Vietnam and the need for a carbon certificate to support the local community. Based on field research in northwest Vietnam, this chapter proposes a modified and easily applicable method for estimating NEP. Research results indicate that one hectare of secondary broad-leaved forest in Vietnam can accumulate 6.57 Mg C y−1, more than twice that of old-growth forest at 2.57 Mg C y−1. Research suggests that NEP is higher than some other forests around the world. We suggest that a price should minimally sustain the livelihood of forest protectors, at around 10 US$/ton carbon, a price much higher than current government payments of 10 US$ ha y−1, regardless of carbon accumulation. This chapter asserts the importance of issuing forest carbon certificate to forest protectors so that local communities can raise their bargaining power to improve their income while at the same time, protect the natural forests sustainably.

Keywords

Carbon market Carbon sequestration Poverty reduction Southeast Asia Tropical forests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Vietnamese National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED), under grant number 106-NN.06-2016.10.

References

  1. Adachi, M., Ito, A., Ishida, A., Kadir, W. R., Ladpala, P., & Yamagata, Y. (2011). Carbon budget of tropical forests in Southeast Asia and the effects of deforestation: An approach using a process-based model and field measurements. Biogeosciences, 8, 2635–2647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baishya, R., & Barik, S. K. (2011). Estimation of tree biomass, carbon pool and net primary production of an old-growth Pinus kesiya Royle ex. Gordon forest in north-eastern India. Annals of Forest Science, 68, 727–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekku, Y., Koizumi, H., Nakadai, T., & Iwaki, H. (1995). Measurement of soil respiration using closed chamber method: An IRGA technique. Ecological Research, 10, 369–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernier, P. Y., & Robitaille, G. (2004). A plane intersect method for estimating fine root productivity of trees from minirhizotron images. Plant and Soil, 265, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caspersen, J. P., Pacala, S. W., Jenkins, C. J., Hurtt, G. C., Moorcroft, P. R., & Birdsey, R. A. (2000). Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. Science, 290, 1148 –1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., et al. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, D. A., Brown, S., Kicklighter, D., Chambers, J. Q., Thomlinson, J. R., & Ni, J. (2001). Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecological Application, 11, 356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davide, M. (2014). Carbon price to survive the crisis. International Climate Policy & Carbon Markets, 30, 2–5.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, D. P., Fisher, B., Wilcove, D. S., Edwards, F. A., Davies, R., & Hamer, K. (2012). Can payments for ecosystem services protect Southeast Asian birds? BOU Proceedings – Ecosystem services: do we need birds?Google Scholar
  10. Fairley, R.I., & Alexander, I. J. (1985). Methods of calculating fine root production in forests. In A. Fitter, H. Atkinson & D. J. Read (Eds.) Ecological interactions in soil: Plants, microbes and animals (pp. 37–42). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Fukushima, M., Kanzaki, M., Hara, M., Ohkubo, T., Preechapanya, P., & Choocharoen, C. (2008). Secondary forest succession after swidden cultivation in the montane forest area in Northern Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1994–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girardin, C. A. J., Malhi, Y., Aragao, L. E. O. C., Mamani, M., Huaraca, H. W., Durand, L., et al. (2010). Net primary productivity allocation and cycling of carbon along a tropical forest elevational transect in the Peruvian Andes. Global Change Biology, 16, 3176–3192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goulden, M. L., Mcmillan, A. M. S., Winston, G. C., Rocha, A. V., Manies, K. L., Harden, J. W., et al. (2011). Patterns of NPP, GPP, respiration, and NEP during boreal forest succession. Global Change Biology, 17, 855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendricks, R. L., & Pregitzer, K. S. (1993). The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Canadian Journal Forest Research, 23, 2507–2520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hishi, T., & Takeda, H. (2005). Dynamics of heterorhizic root systems: protoxylem groups within the fine-root system of Chamaecyparis obtusa. New Phytologist, 167, 509–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoen, H., & Solberg, B. (1994). Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. Forest Science, 40, 429–451.Google Scholar
  17. Majdi, H. K., Pregitzer, K., Moren, A. S., Nylund, J. E., & Agren, G. I. (2005). Measuring fine root turnover in forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil, 276, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masood, E. (2013). Mapping carbon pricing initiative. Carbon Financial at the World Bank. Google Scholar
  19. Medlyn, B. E. P., Bobinson, R., Clement, et al. 2005. Carbon balance of coniferous forests growing in contracting climates: Model-based analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 131, 97–124.Google Scholar
  20. Metcalfe, D. F., Meir, P., & Williams, M. (2007). A comparison of methods for converting rhizotron root length measurements into estimates of root mass production per unit ground area. Plant and Soil, 301, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mokany, K., Raison, R. J., & Prokushkin, A. S. (2006). Critical analysis of root: shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Global Change Biology, 12, 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MRP. (2014). Market readiness proposal. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment – Socialist Republic of Vietnam.Google Scholar
  23. Nguyen, N. B. (1996). Forest soil of Vietnam. Hanoi: Agriculture Publishing House.Google Scholar
  24. O’Connell, K. E. B., Gower, S. T., & Norman, J. M. (2003). Net Ecosystem Production of Two Contrasting Boreal Black Spruce Forest Communities. Ecosystems, 6, 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ohtsuka, T., Mo, W., Satomura, T., Inatomi, M., & Koizumi, H. (2007). Biometric based carbon flux measurements and net ecosystem production (NEP) in a temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest beneath a flux tower. Ecosystems, 10, 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohtsuka, T., Negishi, M., Sugita, K., Iimura, Y., & Hirota, M. (2013). Carbon cycling and sequestration in Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora) forest on lava flow of Mt. Fuji. Ecological Research, 28, 855–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osawa, A., & Aizawa, R. (2012). A new approach to estimate fine root production, mortality, and decomposition using litter bag experiments and soil core techniques. Plant and Soil, 355, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters-Stanley, M., & Yin, D. 2013. Maneuvering the mosaic state of the voluntary carbon markets 2013. A Report by Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace & Bloomberg New Energy Finance.Google Scholar
  29. Raich, J. W., & Nadelhoffer, K. J. (1989). Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology, 70, 1346–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Randerson, J. T., Chaplin, F. S., Harden, J. W., Neff, J. C., & Harmon, M. E. (2002). Net ecosystem production: A comprehensive measure of net carbon accumulation by ecosystems. Ecological Applications, 12, 937–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saigusa, N., Yamamoto, S., Murayama, S., & Kondo, H. (2005). Inter-annual variability of carbon budget components in an Asia-flux forest site estimated by long-term flux measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 134, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sarmiento, G., Pinillos, M., & Garay, I. (2005). Biomass variability in tropical American lowland rainforests. Ecotropicos, 18, 1–20.Google Scholar
  33. Sato, T., Kominami, Y., Saito, S., Niiyama, K., Tanouchi, H., Nagamatsu, D., et al. (2010). Temporal dynamics and resilience of fine aboveground litterfall in relation to typhoon disturbances over 14 years in an old-growth lucidophyllous forest in southwestern Japan. Plant Ecology, 208, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sawamoto, T., Hatano, R., Shibuya, M., Takahashi, K., Isaev, A. P., Desyatkin, R. M., et al. (2003). Changes in net ecosystem production associated with forest fire in Ihiga ecosystems, near Yakutsk, Russia. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 49, 93–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schlesinger, H. W., & Andrews, A. J. (2000). Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 48, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sherman, E. R., Fahey, J., & Martinez, T. (2003). Spatial patterns of biomass and aboveground net primary productivity in a mangrove ecosystem in the Dominican Republic. Ecosystems, 6, 384–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tadaki, Y. (1968). Studies on the production structure of forest (XIV). The third report on the primary production of a young stand of Castonopsis cuspidate. Journal of Japanese Forest Society, 50, 60–64.Google Scholar
  38. Tateno, R., Hishi, T., & Takeda, H. (2004). Above and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen. Forest Ecology and Management, 193, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tran, V. D., Don, L. K., & Hoang, V. T. (2005). Rehabilitation of the native forest tree species at the forest plantations and denuded hills of Namlau commune in Sonla Province. Vietnam. Forest Science and Technology, 1, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tran, V. D., Osawa, A., & Thang, N. T. (2010). Recovery process of a mountain forest after shifting cultivation in Northwestern Vietnam. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 1650–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tran, V. D., Osawa, A., Thang, N. T., et al. (2011). Population changes of early successional forest species after shifting cultivation in Northwestern Vietnam. New Forests, 41, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whittaker, R. H., & Woodwell, G. M. (1968). Dimension and production relations of trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven forests, New York. Journal of Ecology, 56, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Bank. 2013. Mapping carbon pricing initiatives. Developments and prospects.Google Scholar
  44. Wunder, S., Engel, S., & Pagiola, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services in developing and developed countries. Ecological Economics, 65, 834–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yashiro, Y., Lee, N. Y. M., Ohtsuka, T., Shizu, Y., Saitoh, T. M., & Koizumi, H. (2010). Biometric-based estimation of net ecosystem production in a mature Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) plantation beneath a flux tower. Journal of Plant Research, 123, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere (RISH)Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Silviculture Research InstituteVietnamese Academy of Forest SciencesHanoiVietnam
  3. 3.Department of Forest VegetationForestry and Forest Products Research InstituteTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations