Advertisement

Fueling Transformation in the Mekong: Thailand’s Trade in Agro-Energy

  • Sabrina Shaw
  • Samai Jai-In
  • Muanpong Juntopas
Chapter
Part of the Asia in Transition book series (AT, volume 7)

Abstract

The Mekong region stands at an important development juncture, where the dynamics of sustainability are being defined through an unprecedented level of cooperation on agriculture, energy, and trade in combination with action to address climate change. This chapter examines the policy space to develop sustainable agriculture while fueling transformation in the Mekong region based on research from the field. This research brings together evidence, pointing to the need for a paradigm shift in the food, energy, and water nexus toward greater policy integration. The use of bioenergy may promote energy security, revitalize rural economies, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions if implemented at the local community level. However, meeting food and energy needs in the twenty-first century, especially in Southeast Asia, will require a range of approaches to shift the current development paradigm in order to enhance natural resource governance and climate-friendly agricultural practices. This research shows that if current practices prevail, Thailand is likely to use an unsustainable model of trade-led development at the regional level. To the end, this chapter puts forward an alternative development strategy to build on the synergies between small-scale initiatives and agro-energy sustainability. However, evidence indicates that these synergies will be difficult to capture in the current policy climate that separates people’s well-being, social progress, and ecosystem sustainability from intensifying resource use in the Mekong.

Keywords

Mekong region Thailand Trade Regional integration Bioenergy Agro-energy Biofuels Sustainable development Resource use Community-based resource management Smallholders Value chains Climate change 

References

  1. Abdel Motaal, D. (2008). The biofuels landscape: Is there a role for the WTO? Journal of World Trade, 42(1), 61–86.Google Scholar
  2. Achawangkul, Y. (2015). Thailand’s integrated energy blueprint. Bangkok: Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency.Google Scholar
  3. Asian Development Bank (ADB). (2009a). Road map for expanded energy cooperation in the Greater Mekong. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  4. ADB. (2009b). Development partners meeting on GMS biofuels and rural renewable energy. Bangkok: ADB.Google Scholar
  5. ADB. (2009c). Status and potenial for the development of biofuels and rural renewable energy: Thailand. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  6. ADB. (2009d). Exploring core environment program-private sector partnerships for developing biodiesel as an alternative fuel in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Bangkok: ADB.Google Scholar
  7. ADB. (2013). Thinking about water differently: Managing the water-food-energy nexus. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  8. ADB. (2015). Fossil fuel subsidies in Thailand: Trends, impacts and reform. Manila: ADB. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/175455/fossil-fuel-subsidies-thailand.pdf.
  9. Allouche, J., Middleton, C., & Gyawali, D. (2015). Technical veil, hidden politics: Interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 610–626.Google Scholar
  10. Altieiri, M. (2009). Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review, July–August.Google Scholar
  11. Apichart, J. (2015). Integrated energy development. Presentation for the 12th Annual Meeting of the Working Group on Agriculture (WGA). Bangkok: WGA.Google Scholar
  12. Babel, M. S., Shrestha, B., & Perret, S. R. (2011). Hydrological impact of biofuel production on hydrology: A case study of the Khlong Phlo Watershed in Thailand. Agricultural Water Management, 101, 8–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a new modernity. Translation by M. Ritter. London: Sage. Originally published in 1986 as Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  14. Brazil. (1998). The energy sector: The case of alcohol fuel (Ethanol). Submission by Brazil to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Committee on Trade and Environment. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
  15. Brazil. (2005). Environmental goods for development. Submission by Brazil to the WTO (TN/TE/W/59). Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
  16. Bruckman, V., Haruthaithanasan, M., Kraxner, F., Miller, F., Darabant, A., Choumnit, G., et al. (2016). ACMECS Bioenergy 2015: Three years of efforts towards a regional bioenergy network. Bangkok: International Union of Forest Resource Organizations.Google Scholar
  17. Bundit, F. (2009). Recent policies and challenges in sustainable energy development in Thailand. In V. K. Vijay & H. P. Garg (Eds.), Renewable energy and environment for sustainable development (pp. 12–25). New Delhi: Narosa.Google Scholar
  18. Chantanakome, W. (2016). Regional energy security infrastructure Perspective: Strategic policy and action. Bangkok: Presentation at sustainable energy and technology Asia (SETA). http://www.eppo.go.th/index.php/th/planpolicy/tieb/aedp
  19. Chanthawong, A., & Dhakal, S. (2016). Liquid biofuels development in Southeast Asian countries: An analysis of market, policies and challenges. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 7, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Charnovitz, S., Earley, J., & Howse, R. (2008). An examination of social standards in biofuels sustainability criteria. Washington D. C: International Food and Agricultural Trade Policy Council.Google Scholar
  21. Cramer Commission. (2007). Testing framework for sustainable biomass. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Cramer Commission.Google Scholar
  22. DEDE. (2013). Alternative energy development plan. Bangkok: Ministry of Energy. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.dede.go.th/download/state_58/sit_57_58/Thailand-Alternative-Energy-Situation.pdf.
  23. Department of alternative energy development and efficiency (DEDE). (2015a). Ten-year renewable energy development plan (2015–2025). Bankgok: Ministry of Energy.Google Scholar
  24. DEDE. (2015b). Energy in Thailand: Facts and figures for 2014. Bangkok: Ministry of Energy. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://weben.dede.go.th/webmax/sites/default/files/factsq1_2014.pdf.
  25. Dehue, B., Meyer, S., & Hamelick, C. (2007). WWF—Towards A harmonised sustainable biomass certification. Utrech, The Netherlands: WWF.Google Scholar
  26. Doornbosch, R., & Steenblik, R. (2007). Biofuels: Is the cure worse than the disease?. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  27. EC. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (repeal. Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Directive 2008/0016). 23 April. Official Journal of the European Union, 5 June.Google Scholar
  28. EC, European Commission. (2015). Directive 2015/1513 to reduce indirect land use change for biofuels and bioliquids (Amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources). 9 September. Official Journal of the European Union, 15 September.Google Scholar
  29. Echols, M. (2009). Biofuels certification and the law of the WTO. Geneva: International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  30. ECOFYS. (2009). Trade sustainability impact assessment for the free trade area between the European Union and the Association for Southeast Asian Nations. Rotterdam: ECOFYS.Google Scholar
  31. ECOFYS. (2016). Greenhouse gas reduction roadmap for Thailand. Rotterdam: ECOFYS and Global Green Growth Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2008). State of food and agriculture. Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities. Rome: FAO. http://www.ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/011/i0100e/i0100e.pdf.
  33. FAO. (2009a). Enabling agriculture to contribute to climate change mitigation. Submission to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Climate Change Convention. Rome: FAO. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/2008/smsn/igo/036.pdf.
  34. FAO. (2009b). Small-scale bioenergy initiatives. Rome: FAO & Policy Innovation Systems for Clean Energy Security.Google Scholar
  35. FAO. (2011). Launch of the state of the world’s land and water resources for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW): Managing systems at risk. Rome: FAO. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.fao.org/nr/water/news/solaw_launch.html.
  36. FAO. (2012a). Policies and institutions to support smallholder agriculture. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  37. FAO. (2012b). Smallholders in global bioenergy value chains and certification. Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i2597e.pdf.
  38. Foran, T. (2013). Impacts of natural resource-led development on the Mekong Energy System. In A. Smajgl & J. Ward (Eds.), The water-food-energy nexus in the Mekong Region (pp. 105–142). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fullbrook, D. (2007). Contract farming in Lao PDR: Cases and questions. Vientiane: Laos Extension for Agriculture Project (LEAP).Google Scholar
  40. Fullbrook, D. (2013). Food security in the wider Mekong Region. In A. Smajgl & J. Ward (Eds.), The water-food-energy nexus in the Mekong Region (pp. 61–104). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giampietro, M., & Mayumi, K. (2009). The biofuel delusion: The fallacy of large scale agro-biofuels production. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  42. Global Carbon Atlas. (2017). Retrieved April 5, 2018, from http://www.globalcarbonatlas.org/en/CO2-emissions.
  43. Global Climate Risk Index (GCRI). (2016). Bonn: Germanwatch. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from https://germanwatch.org/fr/download/13503.pdf.
  44. Gotsch, E. (2016). Fazenda da toca, state of São Paulo. https://youtu.be/gSPNRu4ZPvE.
  45. Greater Mekong Forum on Water, Food & Energy. (2015). Proceedings. Implemented by the CGIAR Resource Programme on Water, Land and Ecosystems. https://wle-mekong.cgiar.org/2015forum/.
  46. Guariguata, M., Masera, O., Johnson, F. X., von Maltitz, G., Bird, N., Tella, P., et al. (2011). A Review of environmental issues in the context of biofuels sustainability. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
  47. Halle, M., & Raskin, P. (2010). World trade: A new direction. The global trade inititative. Boston: Tellus Institute. http://www.tellus.org/pub/GTI%20Perspective%20-%20World%20Trade%20-%20A%20New%20Direction.pdf.
  48. Hodbodt, J., & Tomei, J. (2013). Demystifying the social impacts of biofuels at local levels: Where is the evidence? Geography Compass, 15 July.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Huang, J., Qiu, H., Yang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2009). Status and potential for the development of biofuels and rural renewable energy: The People’s Republic of China. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  50. IAASTD, International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development. (2009). Agriculture at a crossroads: Summary for decision makers of the global report. Report for the United Nations. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  51. IEA. (2011). Technology roadmap: Biofuels for transport. Paris: IEA. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Biofuels_Roadmap_WEB.pdf.
  52. IEA. International Energy Agency. (2015). World energy outlook 2015. Paris: IEA.Google Scholar
  53. IISD/GSI. (2012). State of play on biofuels subsidies: Are policies ready to shift?. Geneva: IISD/GSI.Google Scholar
  54. IISD/GSI. (2015). Financing the sustainable development goals through fossil-fuel subsidy reform: Opportunities in Southeast Asia, India and China. Winnipeg: IISD. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/les/nancing-sdgs-fossil-fuel-subsidy-reform-southeast-asian-india-china(6).pdf.
  55. Jitsanguan, T. (2001). Sustainable agricultural systems for small-scale farmers in Thailand: Implications for the environment. Bangkok: Department of Agirucltural and Resource Economics, Kasetsart University. http://www.fftc.agnet.org/htmlarea_file/library/20110718190247/eb509.pdf.
  56. Johnson, F. X., & Seebaluck, V. (Eds.). (2012). Bioenergy for sustainable development and international competitiveness. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Jung, A., Dörrenberg, P., Rauch, A., & Thöne, M. (2010). Biofuels—At what cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in the European Union–2010 Update. Geneva: IISD/GSI.Google Scholar
  58. Koplow, D. 2007. Biofuels–at what cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in the United States–2007 Update. Geneva: IISD/GSI. http://www.iisd.org/gsi/biofuel-subsidies/biofuels-what-cost.
  59. Kumar, S., Salam, P. A., Shrestha, P., & Ackom, E. (2013). An assessment of Thailand’s biofuel development. Sustainability, 5, 1577–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lopez, G. P., & Laan, T. (2008). Biofuels—At what Cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in China. Geneva: IISD/GSI.Google Scholar
  61. Malik, U., Ahmed, M., Sombilla, M.A., & Cueno, S. (2009). Biofuels production for smallholder producers in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Applied Energy, 86, 58–68Google Scholar
  62. Nguyen, T., Gheewala, S., & Garivait, S. (2008). Full chain energy analysis of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand. Applied Energy, 85, 722–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Opijnen, M., van & Oldenziel, J. (2011). Responsible supply chain management. Report prepared for the European Commission High Level Group on Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels: Centre for Responsible Multinational Corporations.Google Scholar
  64. Pasuk, P. (2000). State decisions and community rights. In A. Nozakik & C. Baker (Eds.), Village communities, states, and traders: Essays in honour of Chatthip Nartsupha (pp. 188–194). Bangkok: Sangsan.Google Scholar
  65. Penunia, M. E. (2009). Upscale sustainable, integrated, diversified, organic agriculture by smallholders farmers to adapt and mitigate effects of climate change. Paper presented by the Asian Farmers’ Association for sutainable rural development at the 32nd session of IFAD’s Governing Council.Google Scholar
  66. Pimental, D. (2006). Soil erosion: A food and environmental threat. Environment, development and sustainability, 119–137.Google Scholar
  67. Pimental, D. (2009). Food versus biofuels: Environmental and economic costs. Human Ecology, 37(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Potts J., Lynch M., Wilkings A., Huppé G.A., Cunningham M., & Voora V. (2014). The state of sustainability initiatives review 2014: Standards and the green economy. Geneva: IISD and IIED. Retrived August 10, 2016, from http://www.iisd.org/library/state-sustainability-initiatives-review-2014-standards-and-green-economy.
  69. Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB). (2011). Consolidated RSB EU RED principles & criteria for sustainable biofuel production (Version 2.1). http://rsb.org/pdfs/standards/RSB-EU-RED-Standards/13-03-01-RSB-STD-11-001-01-001%20vers%202.1%20Consolidated%20RSB%20EU%20RED%20PCs.pdf.
  70. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). (2016). Impacts. http://www.rspo.org/about/impacts.
  71. Salvatore, M., & Damen, B. (2010). Analysis for Thailand. Bio energy and food security project. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  72. Samai, J.-I. (2016). Vision and perspectives of the biofuel sector in Thailand. Bangkok: Presentation at Sustainable Energy and Technologia Asia (SETA), March.Google Scholar
  73. Searchinger, T. (2009). Government policies and drivers of world biofuels, sustainability criteria, certification proposals and their limitations. In R. Howard & S. Bringezu (Eds.), Biofuels: Environmental consequences and interactions with changing Land use (pp. 37–52). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Segschneider, K. (Ed.). (2008). Field survey on sustainable palm oil in Thailand and compliance with international standards. Bangkok: Southeast Asia Consult & Resource Company.Google Scholar
  75. SEI, Stockholm Environment Institute. (2008). Bioenergy for sustainable development and global competitiveness: The case of sugar cane. Stockholm: SEI.Google Scholar
  76. Shaw, S. (2009). Bioenergy policies and legal framework in Thailand. In E. Morgera, K. Kulovesi, & A. Gobena (Eds.), Case studies on bioenergy policies and law: Options for sustainability (pp. 289–328) Rome: FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1285e/i1285e.pdf.
  77. Shaw, S. (2010). Trade in agro-energy in the Mekong. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn.Google Scholar
  78. Silalertruksa, T., & Gheewala, S. (2012). Environmental sustainability assessment of palm biodiesel production in Thailand. Energy, 43, 306–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S., Hunecke, K., & Fritsche, U. R. (2012a). Biofuels and employment effects: Implications for socioeconomic development in Thailand. Biomass and Bioenergy, 46, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Silalertruksa, T., Bonnet, S., & Gheewala, S. (2012b). Life cycle costing and externalities of palm oil biodiesel in Thailand. Journal of Clean Production, 28, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Siriwardhana, M., Opathella, G., & Jha, M. (2009). Biodiesel: Initiatives, potential and prospects in Thailand. A Review Energy Policy, 37, 554–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (Eds.). (2013). The water-food-energy nexus in the Mekong Region. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Sombilla, M., Malik, U., Ahmed, M., & Cueno, S. (2009). Integrating biofuel and rural renewable energy production in agriculture for poverty reduction in the Greater Mekong Subregion. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  84. Steenblik, R. (2007). Biofuels–at what cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in selected OECD countries. Geneva: IISD/GSI. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/gsi/biofuel-subsidies/biofuels-what-cost
  85. Surapong, C. (2008). Fuel ethanol market assessment and potential of cassava in Thailand. Bangkok: Field Crop Research Institute, Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  86. TGO, Thailand Greenhous Gas Organisation. (2016). TGO carbon monthly. www.tgo.org.
  87. Thamsiriroj, T., & Murphy, J. (2009). Is it better to import palm oil from Thailand to produce biodiesel in ireland than to produce biodiesel from indigenous Irish rape seed? Applied Energy, 86, 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tharakan, P., Crishna, N., Romero, J., & Morgado, D. (2012). Biofuels in the greater Mekong subregion: Energy sufficiency, food security, and environmental management. ADB Southeast Asia Working Paper Series No. 8. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
  89. Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., et al. (2009). Beneficial biofuels: The food, energy, and environment trilemca. Science, 325, 270–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. UNCTAD, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2008). Biofuel production technologies: Status, prospects and implications for trade and development. New York: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  91. UNE, United Nations-Energy. (2007). Sustainable bioenergy: A framework for decision makers. New York: UNE.Google Scholar
  92. UNEP, United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). The bioenergy and water nexus. Nairobi: UNEP Bioenergy, Oeko Institute and IEA Bioenergy. http://www.unep.org/bioenergy/Portals/48107/publications/waternexus_full.pdf.
  93. UNESCAP, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2009). Sustainable agriculture and food security in the Asia and Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCAP.Google Scholar
  94. Uriarte, F. (2010). Biofuels from plant oils. Jakarta: ASEAN Foundation. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.aseanfoundation.org/documents/books/biofuel.pdf.
  95. USAID, United States Development Agency. (2009). Biofuels in Asia: An analysis of sustainability options. Bangkok: USAID.Google Scholar
  96. USDA, United States Department of Agriculture. (2016). Thailand biofuels annual. Bangkok: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Biofuels%20Annual_Bangkok_Thailand_7-22-2016.pdf.
  97. Weerapat Sessomboon. (2014). Map of clustering of ethanol distribution in Thailand. Correspondence with author. Google Scholar
  98. World Bank. (2008). World development report 2009: Agriculture for development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. World Bank. (2016). Thailand economic monitor. Bangkok: World Bank.Google Scholar
  100. WWF, World Wide Fund for Nature. (2016). Power Sector Vision 2015. http://d2ouvy59p0dg6k.cloudfront.net/downloads/wwf_greater_mekong_power_sector_vision_2050.pdf.
  101. WWF & SNV, The Netherlands Development Organisation. (2009). Developing sustainable pro-Poor biofuels in the Mekong Region. Vientiane: WWF and SNV.Google Scholar
  102. Yang, J., Huang, J., Qiu, H., Rozelle, S., & Sombilla, M. (2009). Biofuels and the Greater Mekong Subregion: Assessing the impacts on prices, production and trade. Applied Energy, 86, 537–546.Google Scholar
  103. Zarrilli, S., & Burnett, J. (2008). Making certification work for sustainable development: The case of biofuels. Geneva: UN Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/Wirec-Simonetta_Zarrilli.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Alternative Energy Foundation, Institute of Thailand (AEF)BangkokThailand
  3. 3.Climate Change Adaptation Specialist, Asian Development Bank (ADB)BangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations