Livelihood After the Dams: Experiences of Tributary Dams in the Mekong River

  • Yuka Kiguchi
Part of the Asia in Transition book series (AT, volume 7)


Over the past 20 years, Southeast Asia has seen the intensification of dam-building projects across and within nations. This chapter exams the construction of dams along Mekong tributaries and their impact on the livelihood of local communities. It focuses closely on the Pak Mun Dam case in northeastern Thailand to show how local communities have been left to bear the negative impacts of dam construction, and how these have affected both fisheries and local knowledge. This chapter argues that the Pak Mun Dam case can serve as a departure point to understand the socio-environmental changes that will arise with the construction of a new dam in the region, the Lower Sesan 2 Dam in Cambodia. Ultimately, this chapter shows what is at stake in the construction of both the dams in terms of impacts upon fish diversity, the loss of fisheries in the Mekong River, and human displacement.


Mekong river Hydropower dams Northeast Thailand Cambodia Livelihood Pak Mun Dam Lower Sesan 2 Dam 



At the field research, Dr. Kanokwan Manorom, Ubon Ratchathani University and Ms. Sompharn Khundee, Supporter of Assembly of the Poor helped me to conduct fieldwork in Thailand. Dr. Akihisa Iwata, Professor at the Graduate School of Asian and African Area Studies (ASAFAS), Kyoto University, provided valuable advice for collecting data. 3S Rivers Protection Network (3SPN) helped me to interview villagers in Ratanakiri Province, Cambodia. Colleagues of the Mekong Watch provided invaluable support to continue working on this issue. This survey would not have been possible without those who kindly allowed me to interview them, and I thank them all. I also would like to express my appreciation to Ms. Wanida Thantiwithayaphitak. Her devotion to those villagers who have suffered from the Pak Mun Dam has inspired me to keep researching this issue. Field research was supported by the Keidanren Nature Conservation Fund and two ASAFAS programs, Initiatives for Attractive Education in Graduate Schools and the 21st Century COE program: Aiming for COE of Integrated Area Studies. At Ubon Ratchathani, The Mekong Sub-region Social Research Center (MSSRC) assisted to provide me with formal research status to conduct field surveys in Thailand.


  1. 3S Rivers Protection Network (3SPN) and Mekong Watch. (2015). Fact Sheet: Lower Sesan 2 Hydropower Project. Northeastern Cambodia: 3SPN and Mekong Watch.Google Scholar
  2. Baird, I. G. (2009). Best practices in compensation and resettlement for large dams: The case of the planned lower Sesan 2 hydropower project in northeastern Cambodia. The River Coalition in Cambodia, Phnom Penh: Cambodia. Accessed: 22. Aug. 2016.
  3. Baran, E. (2010). Mekong fisheries and mainstream dams. Fisheries sections in: ICEM 2010. Mekong River Commission Strategic Environmental Assessment of Hydropower on the Mekong mainstream. Hanoi & VietNam: International Centre for Environmental Management.Google Scholar
  4. Baran, E., Jantunen, T., & Chiew K. C. (2007). Value of inland fisheries in the Mekong river basin. Phnom Penh: WorldFish Center. Accessed: 22. Aug. 2016.
  5. Baran, E., et al. (2013). Fish And fisheries In the Sekong, Sesan And Srepok basin (3S Rivers, Mekong watershed), with special reference to the Sesan river. Phnom Penh: World Fish Center.Google Scholar
  6. Claridge, G. et al. (1997). Community fisheries in Lao PDR: A survey of techniques and issues. Vientiane: The World Conservation Union (IUCN).Google Scholar
  7. Foran, T., & Manorom, K. (2009). Pak Mun Dam: Perpetually contested? In F. Molle, T. Foran, & M. Kakonen (eds.), Contested waterscapes in the Mekong river: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance (pp. 55–80). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  8. Gatke, P. et al. (2013). Fish passage opportunities for the Lower Sesan 2 Dam in Cambodia – lessons from South America. Project report. Hanoi: International Centre for Environmental Management (ICEM). Accessed: 22. Aug. 2016.
  9. Kanokwan, M. (2004). Atalak chang sangkhom chao pramong mae nam mun ton lang: mun phitcarana cak rabop niweat [Identities of fisheries in the Lower Mun River: Focus on its ecology]. In W. Prachayakan (ed.), Watakam atalak (pp. 71–115). Sirinthorn anthropology center (in Thai).Google Scholar
  10. Kiguchi, Y. (2006). The Impacts of the Pak Mun Dam’s construction on fishing and livelihoods in the Lower Mun river region of Northeast Thailand. Masters thesis, Graduate school of Asian and African Area Studies (ASAFAS), Kyoto University (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  11. Kiguchi, Y. (2014). The change in the usage of toum yai fishing gear in north eastern Thailand. In Mekong sub-region social research center (ed.), Changing way of life of ethnicities in the Mekong region (pp. 105–125). Ubon Ratchathani: Faculty of Liberal Arts, Ubon Ratchathani University.Google Scholar
  12. Mekong River Commission. (2002). Fish migrations of the Lower Mekong river basin: implications for development, planning and environmental management. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  13. Mekong River Commission. (2007). Consumption and the yield of fish and other aquatic animal from the Lower Mekong Basin. (MRC Technical Paper No.16). Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  14. Mekong River Commission. (2010). State of the Basin Report. Phnom Penh: Mekong.Google Scholar
  15. Mekong Watch. (2004). A River, its fish and its people: Local knowledge of the national environment at the mouth of the Mun River. Tokyo: Mekong Watch.Google Scholar
  16. Mekong Watch. (2015). Interview at affected village in February 2015 regarding asset survey held on Lower Sesan 2 Dam (Field Note). Tokyo: Mekong Watch.Google Scholar
  17. Research Committee of the Villagers of Rasi Salai. (2004). Rasi Salai: Traditional knowledge, rights and ways of the Mun river’s flood forest. Three-Province People’s Organization Network for protecting wetlands in the Mun River (in Thai).Google Scholar
  18. Roberts, T. R. (1993). Just another dammed river? Negative impact of Pak Mun Dam on fishes of the Mekong basin. Natural History of Bulletin of the Siam Society, 4, 105–133.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, T. R. (2001). On the river of no returns: Thailand’s Pak Mun Dam and its fish ladder. Natural History of Bulletin of the Siam Society, 49, 189–230.Google Scholar
  20. TEAM Consulting Engineers. (1982). Environmental and ecological impact assessment of Pak Mun Project, Vol. 1, Summary Report.Google Scholar
  21. The Assembly of the Poor (AOP) and Southeast Asia rivers network (SEARIN). (2002a). Mae Mun: Kaan klap ma khong khon ha pla [The river Mun: Return of the fishing people]. Chiang Mai: Southeast Asia Rivers Network. (in Thai).Google Scholar
  22. The Assembly of the Poor (AOP) and Southeast Asia rivers network (SEARIN). (2002b). Mae Mun: Kan klap ma khong khon ha pla: bot sarup lae khwaam ruu ruang plaa khong khon paak muun [The river Mun: Return of the fishing people: Summary of local knowledge of fish]. Chiang Mai: Southeast Asia Rivers Network. (in Thai).Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, C. (2008). Wild Mekong Report. WWF Greater Mekong Programme. Accessed: 22. Aug. 2016.
  24. Ubon Ratchatani University. (2002). Khrong kan sueksa naew tang fuen fu rabop niwet withi chiwit lae chumchon thi dai rap phon krathop chak kan sang khuean pak mun [Project to study approaches to restoration of the ecology, livelihood, and communities receiving impacts from construction of the Pak Mun Dam]. Ubon Rachatani: Ubon Ratchatani University (in Thai).Google Scholar
  25. World Commission on Dams (WCD). (2000). WCD case study: Pak Mun Dam Mekong River Basin, Thailand. World Commission on Dams.Google Scholar
  26. Ziv, G. et al. (2012). Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109.15: -5614. Accessed: 22 Aug. 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mekong WatchTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations