Classification of EMG signals is essential for diagnosis of motor neuron diseases like neuropathy and myopathy. Although a number of strategies have been implemented for classification, none of them are efficient enough to be implemented in clinical environment. In the present study, we use ensemble approach of support vector machines for classification of three classes (normal, myopathic and neuropathic) of clinical electromyogram (EMG). Our proposed approach uses time and time–frequency features extracted from EMG signals. By employing two types of feature set for same class discriminators, we are able to select the best feature set-discriminator pairs. The decision made by each selected classifier is used to generate the final class for an input EMG signal through majority voting. Our proposed method yields higher accuracy of 94.67% over 89.67% for multiclass SVM classifier.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Merletti R, Parker P (2004) Electromyography: physiology, engineering, and non-invasive applications. Wiley, Hobokken, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subasi A (2012) Classification of EMG signals using combined features and soft computing techniques. Appl Soft Comput 12:2188–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subasi A (2013) Classification of EMG signals using PSO optimized SVM for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Comput Biol Med 43:576–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamali T, Boostani R, Parsaei H (2014) a multi-classifier approach to MUAP classification for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehab Eng 22(1), 191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton WA, Stashuk DW (2005) Physiologically based simulation of clinical EMG signals [dataset S003]. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52, 171–183. www.emglab.net
Elamvazuthi I, Duy HXN, Ali Z, Su WS, Khan A, Parasuraman S (2015) Electromyography (EMG) based classification of neuromuscular disorders using multi-layer perceptron. Procedia Comput Sci 76:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phinyomark A, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C (2012) Feature reduction and selection for EMG signal classification. Expert Syst Appl 39:7420–7431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akansu Ali N, Haddad Richard A (1992) Multiresolution signal decomposition: transforms, subbands, and wavelets. Academic Press, Boston, MAMATHGoogle Scholar