Teacher Assessment Literacy Scale: Design and Validation

  • Kay Cheng Soh
  • Limei Zhang


With the increased use of language assessment, language teachers are required to develop assessment literacy and take the testing and assessment responsibilities. This article reports the processes and outcomes of the development and validation of the Teacher Assessment Literacy Scale for use with Singapore’s Chinese Language teachers.


  1. American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). The standards for competence in the educational assessment of students. Retrieved July 22, 2003, from
  2. Bademci, V. (2006). Cronbach’s alpha is not a measure of unidimensionality or homogeneity. Paper presented at the conference Paradigm shift: Tests are not reliable at Gazi University, 28 April 2006.Google Scholar
  3. DeLuca, C., laPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhange, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fan, X. (1998). Item response theory and classical test theory: An empirical comparison of their item/person statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(3), 357–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fulcher, G. (2012). Language literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gotch, C. M., & French, B. F. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, 33(2), 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  9. Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(2), 255–276.Google Scholar
  10. Linn, R. L., & Miller, M. D. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, Merrill, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Magno, C. (2009). Demonstrating the difference between classical test theory and item response theory using derived test data. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 1(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  12. Malone, M. (2008). Training in language assessment. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 7, pp. 273–284)., Language testing and assessment New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Pike, C. K., & Hudson, W. W. (1998). Reliability and measurement error in the presence of homogeneity. Journal of Social Service Research, 24(1/2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Popham, J. (2006). All about accountability/needed: A dose of assessment literacy. Educational Leadership, 63(6), 84–85.
  15. Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into. Practice, 48, 4–11. Scholar
  16. Preito, L., Alonso, J., & Lamarca, R. (2003). Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1:27. 10.186/1477-7525-1-27.Google Scholar
  17. Rasch, G (1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: Mesa Press.Google Scholar
  18. Soh, K. C., & Zhang, L. (2017). The development and validation of a teacher assessment literacy scale: A trail report. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 8(1), 91–116.Google Scholar
  19. Spolsky, B. (1978). Introduction: Linguists and language testers. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), Approaches to language testing: Advances in language testing series (Vol. 2, pp. V–X). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  20. Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured words: The development of objective language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539.Google Scholar
  22. Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31–125.Google Scholar
  23. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007a). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using rasch models: Part I—instrument development tools. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 97–123.Google Scholar
  24. Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007b). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II—validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 204–233.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations