Advertisement

Learner Agency and the Negotiation of Practice

  • Raymond SmithEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 29)

Abstract

Within work, it is impossible to ‘not act’. Workers, by necessity of their presence and participation in the goal-oriented practices that constitute work, are inexorably driven to engage in the activities and relationships that enable and sustain their work. However, and by contrast to such certainty, the nature of their engagement remains problematic as their capacities and willingness to enact the requirements of work are interdependently related to and, hence, mediated by all the resources that comprise the people, places and practices of their work. Conceptualising these mediations as ‘negotiation’ and individual workers’ circumstances through these negotiations as ‘agency’ offers an opportunity to examine work learning as a transformational practice and highlight the contributions workers make to this practice. What emerges from such examination is a conception of learning in, through and for work as a kind of resource management process whereby workers control (or seek to understand and affect with varying degrees of intention and success) the fluctuating levels of influence that the numerous resources enacted in work practice can exert on their personal engagement. To illustrate its case, the chapter draws on qualitative research that examined the personal work and learning practices of workers from very different contexts and with a range of differing skill and qualification requirements. These included packers from fruit markets who required no qualifications or previous experience prior to employment and who sourced all their work learning from the immediacy of their work, firefighters who were constantly engaged in nationally accredited and compliance-driven vocational training as part of their regular occupational practice and restaurant staff who were pursuing their careers after long apprenticeships. Findings from this research suggest that learner agency is, in part, about generating a personal work-practice agenda that enables active engagement in the negotiations of work learning.

Keywords

Learner agency Personal agency Personal practice Learner engagement Learning negotiation Transformational practice Intentionality Work learning Agentic learning 

References

  1. Bamberger, P., Biron, M., & Meshoulam, I. (2014). Human resource strategy: Formulation, implementation and impact (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Towards a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the life course: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billett, S., Smith, R., & Barker, M. (2005). Understanding work, learning and the remaking of cultural practices. Studies in Continuing Education, 27(3), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edwards, A. (2010). Being an expert professional practitioner. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, K. (2007). Concepts of bounded agency in education, work and the personal lives of young adults. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geyer, F., & Schweitzer, D. (Eds.). (1976). Theories of alienation: Critical perspectives in philosophy and the social sciences. Leiden: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Gibbs, R. (2001). Intentions as emergent products of social interactions. In B. Malle, L. Moses, & D. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition (pp. 105–122). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  13. Hampe, M. (2002). Cited in Straub, J., Zielke, B. & Werbik, H. (2005). Autonomy, narrative identity and their critics. In W. Greve, K. Rothermund & D. Wentura (Eds.), The adaptive self: Personal continuity and intentional self-development (pp. 323–350). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe and Huber.Google Scholar
  14. Harteis, C., & Goller, M. (2014). New skills for new jobs: Work agency as a necessary condition for successful lifelong learning. In T. Halttunen, M. Koivisto, & S. Billett (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognising and certifying lifelong learning (pp. 37–56). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Riley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCann, H. (1998). The works of agency: On human action, will and freedom. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Noon, M., Blyton, P., & Morrell, K. (2013). The realities of work: Experiencing work and employment in contemporary society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, R. (2006). Epistemological agency: A necessary action-in-context perspective on new employee learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, R. (2012). Clarifying the subject centred approach to vocational learning theory. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, R. (2014). Conceptualising the socio-personal practice of learning in work as negotiation. Vocations and Learning, 7(2), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations