Advertisement

Work Experience and VET: Insights from the Connective Typology and the Recontextualisation Model

  • David GuileEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 29)

Abstract

The chapter compares two models of work experience – connective typology of work experience and recontextualisation of knowledge model – and uses the term work experience to refer to the way that young people enrolled in both school- and apprenticeship-based VET learn to relate their experience of education as represented by the acquisition of domain knowledge and their experience of work as represented by occupational values, skill and knowledge to one another. The common link between the two models is that they accept the existence of a mediated relationship between education and work. The former explores this relationship from a boundary-crossing perspective, focusing on learners’ movement between education and work, and identifies the outcomes associated with different models of work experience. The latter focuses on the interplay between the manifestation of knowledge in the contexts of education and work and learners’ movement within and between both contexts. It differs from the connective typology, because it takes account of the mediated nature of the contexts of education and work as well as the process of learning through work experience. The chapter concludes by using the concept of recontextualisation to highlight how digital and mobile technologies could serve as resources to facilitate learning through work experience in school- and apprenticeship-based VET.

Keywords

Connectivity Learner Knowledge Mediation Recontextualisation Work experience 

References

  1. Ainley, P., & Rainbird, H. (Eds.). (1999). Apprenticeship: Towards a new paradigm of learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  2. Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24, 101–139.Google Scholar
  5. Beach, K., & Vyas, S. (1998). Light pickles and heavy mustard: Horizontal development among students negotiating how to learn in a production activity. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference of the International Society for Cultural research and Activity Theory, University of Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of the post industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique (Rev. ed.). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Boreham, N., & Fischer, M. (2002). Work process knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy. InSociety and Culture. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  12. European Union. (1999). Lifelong learning memorandum. Brussels: EU.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbid, H., & Unwin, L. (2002). Improving Learning at Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fischer, M., & Stuber, F. (1998). Work process knowledge and school-to-work transition. In E. Scherer (Ed.), Shop floor control: A systems perspective. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Green, A., Leney, T., & Wolf. (1999). Convergence and divergence in European education and training systems. London: Bedford Way Papers, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  16. Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (1999). Pedagogy in work-based contexts. In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths, T., Miller, A., & Peffers, J. (Eds.). (1992). European work experience: Principles and practice. Centre for Education and Industry: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  18. Griffiths, T., et al. (2001). Work experience as an education and training strategy: New approaches for the 21st century. Final report of an EU Fourth Framework (Targeted Socio-Economic Research) project to the European Commission.Google Scholar
  19. Guile, D. (2010). The learning challenge of the knowledge economy. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  20. Guile, D. (2014a). Professional knowledge and professional practice as continuous recontextualisation: A social practice perspective. In J. Muller & M. Young (Eds.), Knowledge, expertise and the professions (pp. 78–92). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Guile, D. (2014b). Professional knowledge and professional practice as continuous recontextualisation: a social practice perspective. In T. Fenwick & M. Nerland (Eds.), Rethinking professional learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Guile, D., & Ahamed, F. (2010). Modernising the undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. LLAKES Research Paper 26. ESRC Research Centre Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
  23. Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jamieson, I., Miller, A., & Watts, A. G. (1988). Mirrors of work. Brighton: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kämäräinen, P., & Streumer, J. (1998). Curriculum development, new learning environments, and transfer of innovations in Europe. In Vocational education and training – The European research field (Background Report 1998, Vol. II). Thessaloniki: Cedefop.Google Scholar
  26. Kindermann, T., & Skinner, E. A. (1992). Modeling environmental development: Individual and contextual trajectories. In J. B. Asendorpf & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Stability and change in development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, W., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Strategy, value innovation and the knowledge. Economy Sloan Management Review, 10(4), 41–54.Google Scholar
  28. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  29. Lahiff, A., & Guile, D. (2016). “It’s not like it’s normal 9 to 5”: The learning journeys of media production apprentices in distributed working conditions. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 68, 302–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Miller, A. (1996). To boldly go … work experience but not as we know it? In A. Miller & G. Forrest (Eds.), Work experience for the 21st century. CEI: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, A., Watts, A. G., & Jamieson, I. (Eds.). (1991). Rethinking work experience. Brighton: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nonaka, I., & Teece, D. (2001). Managing industrial knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Oates, T., & Fettes, T. (1997). Work experience and key skills. In G. Forrest (Ed.), Work experience for the 21st century: Changing priorities, changing practice. CEI: University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  38. OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  39. Prawat, R. (1993). The value of ideas. Educational Researcher, 22, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stehr, N. (1994). Knowledge societies. London: Routledge,Google Scholar
  43. Stern, D., & Wagner, D. A. (Eds.). (1991). International perspectives on school-to-work transition. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  44. Touraine, A. (1969). Post industrial society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  45. Vickers, M. (1995). Employer participation in school-to-work Programmes: The changing situation in Europe. In T. Bailey (Ed.), Learning to work: Employer participation in school-to-work programmes. Washington: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  46. Watts, A. G. (1983). Work experience and schools. London: Heinnemann.Google Scholar
  47. Watts, A. G. (1991). The concept of work experience. In A. Miller, A. G. Watts, & I. Jamieson (Eds.), Rethinking work experience. Brighton: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  48. Wishard, J., & Green, D. (2011). Future scenarios for workplace-based mobile learning. In N. Pachler, C. Pimmer, & J. Seipold (Eds.), Work-based mobile learning. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations